Fuller Christina, Başkent Deniz, Free Rolien
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Research School of Behavioral and Cognitive Neurosciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Front Neurosci. 2019 Oct 11;13:1050. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.01050. eCollection 2019.
Typical cochlear implant (CI) users, namely postlingually deafened and implanted, report to not enjoy listening to music, and find it difficult to perceive music. Another group of CI users, the early-deafened (during language acquisition) and late-implanted (after a long period of auditory deprivation; EDLI), report a higher music appreciation, but is this related to a better music perception? Sixteen EDLI and fifteen postlingually deafened (control group) CI users participated in the study. The inclusion criteria for EDLI were: severe or profound hearing loss onset before the age of 6 years, implantation after the age of 16 years, and CI experience more than 1 year. Subjectively, music perception and appreciation was evaluated using the Dutch Musical Background Questionnaire. Behaviorally, music perception was measured with melodic contour identification (MCI), using two instruments (piano and organ), each tested with and without a masking contour. Semitone distance between successive tones of the target varied from 1 to 3 semitones. Subjectively, the EDLI group reported to appreciate music more than postlingually deafened CI users. Behaviorally, while clinical phoneme recognition test score on average was lower in the EDLI group, melodic contour identification did not significantly differ between the two groups. There was, however, an effect of instrument and masker for both groups; the piano was the best-recognized instrument, and for both instruments, the masker with non-overlapping pitch was best recognized. EDLI group reported higher appreciation of music than postlingual control group, even though behaviorally measured music perception did not differ significantly between the two groups. Both surprising findings since EDLI CI users would be expected to have lower outcomes based on the early deafness onset, long duration of auditory deprivation, and on average lower clinical speech scores. Perhaps, the music perception difficulty comes from similar electric hearing limitations in both groups. The higher subjective appreciation in EDLI might be due to the lack of a musical memory, with no ability to compare music heard via the CI to acoustic music perception. Overall, our findings support a benefit from implantation for a positive music experience in EDLI CI users.
典型的人工耳蜗(CI)使用者,即语后聋并接受植入手术者,称不喜欢听音乐,且觉得感知音乐很困难。另一组CI使用者,即早聋者(在语言习得期间)和晚植入者(经过长时间听觉剥夺后;EDLI),报告称对音乐的欣赏程度更高,但这与更好的音乐感知有关吗?16名EDLI使用者和15名语后聋(对照组)CI使用者参与了该研究。EDLI的纳入标准为:6岁前 onset 严重或极重度听力损失,16岁后植入,且有超过1年的CI使用经验。主观上,使用荷兰音乐背景问卷评估音乐感知和欣赏。行为上,使用旋律轮廓识别(MCI)测量音乐感知,使用两种乐器(钢琴和管风琴),每种乐器在有和没有掩蔽轮廓的情况下进行测试。目标连续音调之间的半音距离从1到3个半音不等。主观上,EDLI组报告比语后聋CI使用者更欣赏音乐。行为上,虽然EDLI组的临床音素识别测试分数平均较低,但两组之间的旋律轮廓识别没有显著差异。然而,两组在乐器和掩蔽器方面都有影响;钢琴是最容易识别的乐器,对于两种乐器,具有非重叠音高的掩蔽器最容易被识别。EDLI组报告对音乐的欣赏程度高于语后对照组,尽管行为测量的音乐感知在两组之间没有显著差异。这两个发现都令人惊讶,因为基于早期耳聋 onset、长时间的听觉剥夺以及平均较低的临床语音分数,预计EDLI CI使用者的结果会更低。也许,音乐感知困难来自两组类似的电听觉限制。EDLI中较高的主观欣赏可能是由于缺乏音乐记忆,无法将通过CI听到的音乐与声学音乐感知进行比较。总体而言,我们的研究结果支持植入对EDLI CI使用者积极的音乐体验有益。