Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Feb;68(2):305-312. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16192. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
Mortality in care homes is high, but care of dying residents is often suboptimal, and many services do not have easy access to specialist palliative care. This study examined the impact of providing specialist palliative care on residents' quality of death and dying.
Using a stepped wedge randomized control trial, care homes were randomly assigned to crossover from control to intervention using a random number generator. Analysis used a generalized linear and latent mixed model. The trial was registered with ANZCTR: ACTRN12617000080325.
Twelve Australian care homes in Canberra, Australia.
A total of 1700 non-respite residents were reviewed from the 12 participating care homes. Of these residents, 537 died and 471 had complete data for analysis. The trial ran between February 2017 and June 2018.
Palliative Care Needs Rounds (hereafter Needs Rounds) are monthly hour-long staff-only triage meetings to discuss residents at risk of dying without a plan in place. They are chaired by a specialist palliative care clinician and attended by care home staff. A checklist is followed to guide discussions and outcomes, focused on anticipatory planning.
This article reports secondary outcomes of staff perceptions of residents' quality of death and dying, care home staff confidence, and completion of advance care planning documentation. We assessed (1) quality of death and dying, and (2) staff capability of adopting a palliative approach, completion of advance care plans, and medical power of attorney.
Needs Rounds are associated with staff perceptions that residents had a better quality of death and dying (P < .01; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.83-12.21), particularly in the 10 facilities that complied with the intervention protocol (P < .01; 95% CI = 6.37-13.32). Staff self-reported perceptions of capability increased (P < .01; 95% CI = 2.73-6.72).
The data offer evidence for monthly triage meetings to transform the lives, deaths, and care of older people residing in care homes. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:305-312, 2020.
养老院的死亡率很高,但临终居民的护理往往不尽如人意,许多服务机构无法便捷地获得专业的姑息治疗。本研究旨在探讨提供专业姑息治疗对居民死亡质量和临终体验的影响。
采用阶梯式随机对照试验,使用随机数发生器将养老院随机分配至对照组或干预组进行交叉。分析采用广义线性和潜在混合模型。该试验在澳大利亚临床试验注册中心(ACTRN12617000080325)注册。
澳大利亚堪培拉的 12 家澳大利亚养老院。
共有 12 家参与养老院的 1700 名非临时居民接受了审查。在这些居民中,537 人死亡,471 人有完整数据进行分析。试验于 2017 年 2 月至 2018 年 6 月进行。
姑息治疗需求评估(以下简称需求评估)是每月一次的、为时 1 小时的仅限员工参加的分诊会议,讨论有死亡风险但未制定计划的居民。会议由一名专业姑息治疗临床医生主持,养老院员工参加。会议遵循检查表指导讨论和结果,重点在于预期性计划。
本文报告了员工对居民死亡和临终质量的看法、养老院员工信心以及预先护理计划文件完成情况的次要结果。我们评估了(1)死亡和临终质量,以及(2)员工采用姑息治疗方法的能力、预先护理计划的完成情况以及医疗委托书的完成情况。
需求评估与员工对居民有更好的死亡和临终质量的看法相关(P<0.01;95%置信区间[CI]为 1.83-12.21),特别是在 10 家遵守干预协议的设施中(P<0.01;95%CI为 6.37-13.32)。员工自我报告的能力感知有所提高(P<0.01;95%CI为 2.73-6.72)。
数据为每月的分诊会议提供了证据,以改善养老院中老年人的生活、死亡和护理。美国老年医学会杂志 68:305-312,2020 年。