• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西班牙治疗社区获得性肺炎的头孢洛林酯治疗的经济分析。

Economic analysis of ceftaroline fosamil for treating community-acquired pneumonia in Spain.

机构信息

Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Spain University of Barcelona, CIBERES, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.

University of Udine and Santa Maria Misericordia University Hospital, Udine, Italy.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2020 Feb;23(2):148-155. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1688819. Epub 2019 Nov 26.

DOI:10.1080/13696998.2019.1688819
PMID:31686550
Abstract

Adults admitted to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) impose significant burden upon limited hospital resources. To achieve early response and possibly early discharge, thus reducing hospital expenditure, the choice of initial antibiotic therapy is pivotal. A cost-consequences model was developed to evaluate ceftaroline fosamil (CFT) as an alternative to other antibiotic therapies (ceftriaxone, co-amoxiclav, moxifloxacin, levofloxacin) for the empiric treatment of hospitalized adults with moderate/severe CAP (PORT score III-IV) from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System (NHS). Compared with ceftriaxone, the model predicted an increase in the number of CFT-treated patients discharged early (PDE) (30.6% vs. 26.1%) while decreasing initial antibiotic failures (3.8% vs. 7.6%). For patients with pneumococcal pneumonia, CFT was cost-saving vs. ceftriaxone (by 1.2%) and significantly increased PDE (32.1% vs. 24.6%). CFT resulted in cost-saving vs. levofloxacin, due lower initial antibiotic therapy costs and increased PDE (30.6% vs. 14.9%). Moxifloxacin and co-amoxiclav early response rate of 53.63% and 54.24% resulted in cost neutrality vs. CFT, with direct comparison hampered by the significantly different early response criteria utilized in the literature. Despite a higher unit cost, CFT is a reasonable alternative to other agents for adults hospitalized with moderate/severe CAP, given the projected higher PDE achieved with similar or lower total costs.

摘要

成人社区获得性肺炎(CAP)住院患者给有限的医院资源带来了巨大负担。为了实现早期治疗反应并可能提前出院,从而降低医院支出,初始抗生素治疗的选择至关重要。本研究从西班牙国家卫生系统(NHS)的角度,建立了一个成本后果模型,用于评估头孢洛林酯(CFT)作为其他抗生素治疗(头孢曲松、复方阿莫西林克拉维酸、莫西沙星、左氧氟沙星)的替代方案,用于经验性治疗中重度 CAP(PORT 评分 III-IV)住院成人患者。与头孢曲松相比,模型预测 CFT 治疗的早期出院患者数量增加(30.6% vs. 26.1%),同时初始抗生素治疗失败率降低(3.8% vs. 7.6%)。对于肺炎链球菌肺炎患者,CFT 与头孢曲松相比具有成本效益(节省 1.2%),并显著增加了 PDE(32.1% vs. 24.6%)。CFT 与左氧氟沙星相比具有成本效益,这是由于初始抗生素治疗费用较低和 PDE 增加(30.6% vs. 14.9%)。莫西沙星和复方阿莫西林克拉维酸的早期反应率分别为 53.63%和 54.24%,与 CFT 相比具有成本中性,由于文献中使用的早期反应标准显著不同,直接比较受到阻碍。尽管单位成本较高,但鉴于 CFT 可实现更高的 PDE,同时总费用相似或更低,对于中重度 CAP 住院的成人患者,CFT 是其他药物的合理替代方案。

相似文献

1
Economic analysis of ceftaroline fosamil for treating community-acquired pneumonia in Spain.西班牙治疗社区获得性肺炎的头孢洛林酯治疗的经济分析。
J Med Econ. 2020 Feb;23(2):148-155. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1688819. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
2
FOCUS 2: a randomized, double-blinded, multicentre, Phase III trial of the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone in community-acquired pneumonia.重点 2:头孢洛林酯氨噻肟与头孢曲松治疗社区获得性肺炎的疗效和安全性的随机、双盲、多中心 III 期临床试验。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Apr;66 Suppl 3:iii33-44. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr097.
3
FOCUS 1: a randomized, double-blinded, multicentre, Phase III trial of the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone in community-acquired pneumonia.重点 1:头孢洛林酯氨噻肟与头孢曲松治疗社区获得性肺炎的疗效和安全性的随机、双盲、多中心、III 期临床试验。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Apr;66 Suppl 3:iii19-32. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr096.
4
Assessment of time to clinical response, a proxy for discharge readiness, among hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia who received either ceftaroline fosamil or ceftriaxone in two phase III FOCUS trials.在两项III期FOCUS试验中,对接受头孢洛林酯或头孢曲松治疗的社区获得性肺炎住院患者的临床反应时间(出院准备情况的替代指标)进行评估。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Feb;59(2):1119-26. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03643-14. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
5
Integrated safety summary of FOCUS 1 and FOCUS 2 trials: Phase III randomized, double-blind studies evaluating ceftaroline fosamil for the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia.FOCUS 1 和 FOCUS 2 试验的综合安全性总结:III 期随机、双盲研究,评估头孢洛林酯治疗社区获得性肺炎患者。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Apr;66 Suppl 3:iii53-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr099.
6
Ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone for the treatment of Asian patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a randomised, controlled, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority with nested superiority trial.头孢呋肟磷酯与头孢曲松治疗亚洲社区获得性肺炎患者的比较:一项随机、对照、双盲、Ⅲ期、非劣效性、嵌套优效性临床试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Feb;15(2):161-71. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)71018-7. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
7
Ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.头孢呋肟酯与头孢曲松治疗社区获得性肺炎的比较:随机对照试验的个体患者数据分析荟萃分析。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Apr;71(4):862-70. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv415. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
8
Cost-effectiveness of gatifloxacin vs ceftriaxone with a macrolide for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.加替沙星与头孢曲松联合大环内酯类药物治疗社区获得性肺炎的成本效益分析
Chest. 2001 May;119(5):1439-48. doi: 10.1378/chest.119.5.1439.
9
Ceftaroline fosamil use in hospitalized patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: Budget impact analysis from a hospital perspective.头孢洛林酯氨丁三醇在住院急性细菌性皮肤及皮肤结构感染患者中的应用:基于医院角度的预算影响分析。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013 Jun 15;70(12):1057-64. doi: 10.2146/ajhp120438.
10
Ceftaroline fosamil as a potential treatment option for Staphylococcus aureus community-acquired pneumonia in adults.头孢洛林酯氨丁三醇作为一种潜在的治疗成人社区获得性肺炎金黄色葡萄球菌的治疗选择。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2019 Oct;54(4):410-422. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.08.012. Epub 2019 Aug 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Ceftaroline fosamil treatment patterns and outcomes in adults with community-acquired pneumonia: a real-world multinational, retrospective study.头孢洛林酯在成人社区获得性肺炎中的治疗模式及疗效:一项真实世界的多国回顾性研究。
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2024 May 27;6(3):dlae078. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae078. eCollection 2024 Jun.