• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

积极自我关系量表——编制与心理测量学特性

Positive Self-Relation Scale - development and psychometric properties.

作者信息

Ociskova Marie, Prasko Jan, Kupka Martin

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University in Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, The Czech Republic.

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Palacky University in Olomouc, Olomouc, The Czech Republic.

出版信息

Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2019 Sep 11;12:861-875. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S212923. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.2147/PRBM.S212923
PMID:31686930
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6751228/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Self-relation is a profound connection that influences one's life. As such, it presents an important topic for various areas of research and psychotherapy. The goal of this study was to develop and evaluate a brief scale that would assess positive aspects of self-relation.

SAMPLE AND METHODS

The Positive Self-Relation Scale (PSRS) consists of 16 items divided into 4 subscales - Self-Acceptance, Self-Confidence, Authenticity and Assertiveness, and Fulfilled Experience. Two samples were used for the evaluation of its content and factor structure. The final sample's data used for validation assessment. This sample consisted of 1234 adults from a general population (mean age 34.8±14.2 years, 70.8% women). All participants completed PSRS. Subgroups also filled in Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), Adult Dispositional Hope Scale (ADHS), Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS), and Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES).

RESULTS

Differences in scores among demographic groups were small to none. Internal consistency was good (Composite Reliability Coefficients - the whole scale: 0.93; the subscales: 0.73-0.80). Temporal stability, assessed 2 weeks apart, was satisfactory (intraclass correlation coefficients - the whole scale: 0.86, the subscales: 0.60-0.82). Factor loadings in confirmatory factor analysis were 0.45-0.80, fit indices mostly showed an adequate model. The correlation coefficients between PSRS and RSES/ADHS were strong (r=0.79/0.55). The scale also strongly correlated with LSAS, BDI-II, and DES (r=-0.61/-0.48/-0.30, all ps<0.001).

CONCLUSION

PSRS showed adequate psychometric properties in the general population. Future studies should include clinical samples. The areas of application lie mainly in research and psychotherapy.

摘要

目的

自我关系是一种深刻的联系,会影响一个人的生活。因此,它是各个研究领域和心理治疗中的一个重要课题。本研究的目的是开发并评估一个简短的量表,用以评估自我关系的积极方面。

样本与方法

积极自我关系量表(PSRS)由16个项目组成,分为4个分量表——自我接纳、自信、真实性与坚定性以及充实体验。使用了两个样本对其内容和因子结构进行评估。最终样本的数据用于效度评估。该样本由1234名来自普通人群的成年人组成(平均年龄34.8±14.2岁,女性占70.8%)。所有参与者都完成了PSRS。各亚组还填写了罗森伯格自尊量表(RSES)、成人气质性希望量表(ADHS)、贝克抑郁量表第二版(BDI-II)、利博维茨社交焦虑量表(LSAS)以及解离体验量表(DES)。

结果

不同人口统计学组之间的得分差异很小或不存在差异。内部一致性良好(组合信度系数——总量表:0.93;分量表:0.73 - 0.80)。相隔两周进行评估的时间稳定性令人满意(组内相关系数——总量表:0.86,分量表:0.60 - 0.82)。验证性因子分析中的因子载荷为0.45 - 0.80,拟合指数大多显示模型合适。PSRS与RSES/ADHS之间的相关系数很强(r = 0.79/0.55)。该量表与LSAS、BDI-II和DES也有很强的相关性(r = -0.61/-0.48/-0.30,所有p值均<0.001)。

结论

PSRS在普通人群中显示出足够的心理测量学特性。未来的研究应纳入临床样本。其应用领域主要在于研究和心理治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de95/6751228/44f6c8cadc0a/PRBM-12-861-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de95/6751228/4f8318edf455/PRBM-12-861-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de95/6751228/44f6c8cadc0a/PRBM-12-861-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de95/6751228/4f8318edf455/PRBM-12-861-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de95/6751228/44f6c8cadc0a/PRBM-12-861-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Positive Self-Relation Scale - development and psychometric properties.积极自我关系量表——编制与心理测量学特性
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2019 Sep 11;12:861-875. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S212923. eCollection 2019.
2
[The Fear of Negative Evaluation scale (FNE): psychometric properties of the French version].[恐惧负面评价量表(FNE):法语版的心理测量特性]
Encephale. 2004 Nov-Dec;30(6):517-24. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95465-6.
3
Validation of the Chinese version of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: evidence from a three-wave longitudinal study.罗森伯格自尊量表中文版的验证:来自一项三波纵向研究的证据。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Oct 18;11(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01293-1.
4
Psychometric evaluation of the Czech Beck Depression Inventory-II in a sample of depressed patients and healthy controls.在抑郁症患者样本和健康对照中对捷克版贝克抑郁量表第二版进行心理测量评估。
Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2017 May;38(2):98-106.
5
[Link between depression and academic self-esteem in gifted children].[天才儿童抑郁与学业自尊之间的联系]
Encephale. 2007 Jan-Feb;33(1):11-20. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(07)91554-7.
6
The Brief 10-Item Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences-Positive Scale (Brief CAPE-P10): Initial psychometric properties, gender measurement invariance and mean differences among Nigerian adolescents.简短 10 项通灵体验阳性量表(Brief CAPE-P10):初步心理计量特性、性别测量不变性以及尼日利亚青少年之间的平均差异。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2020 Dec;14(6):723-733. doi: 10.1111/eip.12903. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
7
Measuring hope: Standardization of the Czech version of the Adult Dispositional Hope Scale in healthy adults.希望的测量:健康成年人中成人特质希望量表捷克语版本的标准化
Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2017 Jan;37(8):543-550.
8
Development and construction of the Multidimensional Self-Efficacy Scale for Epilepsy (MSESE) and its psychometric properties.癫痫多维自我效能感量表(MSESE)的编制与心理测量学特征。
Epilepsy Behav. 2024 Mar;152:109667. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.109667. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
9
[Validation of the QFS measuring the frequency and satisfaction in social behaviours in psychiatric adult population].[用于评估成年精神病患者社交行为频率与满意度的QFS量表的验证]
Encephale. 2006 Jan-Feb;32(1 Pt 1):45-59. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(06)76136-x.
10
[Validation of the Spanish version of the Liebowitz social anxiety scale, social anxiety and distress scale and Sheehan disability inventory for the evaluation of social phobia].[用于社交恐惧症评估的利博维茨社交焦虑量表、社交焦虑与痛苦量表及希恩功能障碍量表西班牙语版本的验证]
Med Clin (Barc). 1999 Apr 24;112(14):530-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Pharmacological interventions for people with borderline personality disorder.药物干预治疗边缘型人格障碍患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 14;11(11):CD012956. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012956.pub2.
2
Clinimetric approach to rating scales for the assessment of apathy in Parkinson's disease: A systematic review.临床计量学方法评估帕金森病淡漠的量表:系统评价。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Aug 30;94:109641. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2019.109641. Epub 2019 May 3.
3
Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer.
健康、社会和行为研究量表开发与验证的最佳实践:入门指南。
Front Public Health. 2018 Jun 11;6:149. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149. eCollection 2018.
4
Evaluating psychiatric symptoms in Parkinson's Disease by a clinimetric analysis of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-90-R).采用 Hopkins 症状清单(SCL-90-R)对帕金森病患者的精神症状进行临床计量学分析。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2018 Feb 2;81:131-137. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.10.024. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
5
The cross-national epidemiology of social anxiety disorder: Data from the World Mental Health Survey Initiative.社交焦虑障碍的跨国流行病学:来自世界心理健康调查倡议的数据。
BMC Med. 2017 Jul 31;15(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0889-2.
6
Psychometric evaluation of the Czech Beck Depression Inventory-II in a sample of depressed patients and healthy controls.在抑郁症患者样本和健康对照中对捷克版贝克抑郁量表第二版进行心理测量评估。
Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2017 May;38(2):98-106.
7
Measuring hope: Standardization of the Czech version of the Adult Dispositional Hope Scale in healthy adults.希望的测量:健康成年人中成人特质希望量表捷克语版本的标准化
Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2017 Jan;37(8):543-550.
8
Efficacy of Psychotherapies for Borderline Personality Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.心理治疗对边缘型人格障碍的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 1;74(4):319-328. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.4287.
9
A systematic review of adult attachment and social anxiety.成人依恋与社交焦虑的系统综述。
J Affect Disord. 2017 Mar 15;211:44-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.12.020. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
10
What to Do With "Moderate" Reliability and Validity Coefficients?如何处理“中等”的信度和效度系数?
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Jul;97(7):1051-2. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 Apr 16.