• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Safety and Feasibility of Same-Day Discharge After Implantation of MICRA Transcatheter Leadless Pacemaker System.植入美敦力Micra经导管无导线起搏器系统后当日出院的安全性和可行性
J Atr Fibrillation. 2019 Jun 30;12(1):2153. doi: 10.4022/jafib.2153. eCollection 2019 Jun.
2
Leadless Pacemaker Implantation in Hemodialysis Patients: Experience With the Micra Transcatheter Pacemaker.无导线起搏器在血液透析患者中的植入:Micra 经导管起搏器的经验。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Feb;5(2):162-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.12.008. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
3
Is day-case surgical procedure safe for MICRA leadless pacemaker implantation?日间手术植入美敦力无导线起搏器是否安全?
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025 Jan;68(1):117-123. doi: 10.1007/s10840-024-01907-7. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
4
Outcomes of Micra leadless pacemaker implantation with uninterrupted anticoagulation.Micra 无导线起搏器植入术在不停抗凝治疗下的结果。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 Aug;30(8):1313-1318. doi: 10.1111/jce.13965. Epub 2019 May 16.
5
Implantation of the Micra transcatheter pacing system: A single center North India experience.Micra经导管起搏系统的植入:印度北部单中心经验
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2021 Jan-Feb;21(1):19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2020.10.005. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
6
Left femoral venous access for leadless pacemaker implantation: patient characteristics and outcomes.经左侧股静脉入路植入无导线起搏器:患者特征与结局。
Europace. 2021 Sep 8;23(9):1456-1461. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab083.
7
Morbidity and mortality in patients precluded for transvenous pacemaker implantation: Experience with a leadless pacemaker.经静脉起搏器植入禁忌患者的发病率和死亡率:无导线起搏器的经验。
Heart Rhythm. 2020 Dec;17(12):2056-2063. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.07.035. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
8
Comparison of the safety and efficacy of Nanostim and Micra transcatheter leadless pacemaker (LP) extractions: a multicenter experience.比较 Nanostim 和 Micra 经导管无导线起搏器(LP)取出的安全性和疗效:一项多中心经验。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2020 Jan;57(1):133-140. doi: 10.1007/s10840-019-00684-y. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
9
Development and validation of a risk score for predicting pericardial effusion in patients undergoing leadless pacemaker implantation: experience with the Micra transcatheter pacemaker.开发和验证用于预测无导线起搏器植入患者发生心包积液风险的评分:使用 Micra 经导管起搏器的经验。
Europace. 2022 Jul 21;24(7):1119-1126. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab315.
10
Leadless pacemaker implant in patients with pre-existing infections: Results from the Micra postapproval registry.无导线起搏器植入治疗合并既往感染患者:Micra 注册研究结果。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 Apr;30(4):569-574. doi: 10.1111/jce.13851. Epub 2019 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Leadless pacing in young patients.年轻患者的无导线起搏
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2025 Mar 24;27(Suppl 2):ii14-ii20. doi: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae090. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Is day-case surgical procedure safe for MICRA leadless pacemaker implantation?日间手术植入美敦力无导线起搏器是否安全?
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025 Jan;68(1):117-123. doi: 10.1007/s10840-024-01907-7. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
3
Same-day discharge after transvenous lead extraction: feasibility and outcomes.经静脉导线拔除术后当日出院:可行性和结果。
Europace. 2023 Feb 16;25(2):586-590. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac185.
4
On the Management of Ventricular Arrhythmias Following Leadless Pacemaker Implantation.关于无导线起搏器植入术后室性心律失常的管理
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2021 Nov 15;12(11):4761-4763. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2021.121106. eCollection 2021 Nov.
5
Safety and Efficacy of Leadless Pacemakers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.无导线起搏器的安全性和有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jul 6;10(13):e019212. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019212. Epub 2021 Jun 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Updated performance of the Micra transcatheter pacemaker in the real-world setting: A comparison to the investigational study and a transvenous historical control.在真实环境中更新 Micra 经导管起搏器的性能:与研究性研究和经静脉历史对照的比较。
Heart Rhythm. 2018 Dec;15(12):1800-1807. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
2
Leadless pacemakers: a contemporary review.无导线起搏器:当代综述。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2018 Apr;15(4):249-253. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2018.04.002.
3
Same-Day Discharge After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Current Perspectives and Strategies for Implementation.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后当日出院:当前的观点和实施策略。
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 May 1;1(2):216-23. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.0148.
4
Usefulness of 'figure-of-eight' suture to achieve haemostasis after removal of 15-French calibre femoral venous sheath in patients undergoing cryoablation.在接受冷冻消融的患者中,使用“8”字形缝合线在移除 15Fr 口径股静脉鞘后实现止血的效果。
Europace. 2016 Oct;18(10):1545-1550. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv375. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
5
A Leadless Intracardiac Transcatheter Pacing System.无导线心脏内介入起搏系统。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Feb 11;374(6):533-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511643. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
6
Percutaneous Implantation of an Entirely Intracardiac Leadless Pacemaker.经皮植入全心腔内无导线起搏器。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Sep 17;373(12):1125-35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1507192. Epub 2015 Aug 30.
7
Early performance of a miniaturized leadless cardiac pacemaker: the Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study.小型无导线心脏起搏器的早期性能:Micra经导管起搏研究。
Eur Heart J. 2015 Oct 1;36(37):2510-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv214. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
8
State of the art of leadless pacing.无导线起搏技术的现状。
Europace. 2015 Oct;17(10):1508-13. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv096. Epub 2015 May 29.
9
Feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after implantable cardioverter defibrillator placement for primary prevention.植入式心脏复律除颤器一级预防植入术后当日出院的可行性与安全性
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013 Jul;36(7):885-91. doi: 10.1111/pace.12145. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
10
Trends in permanent pacemaker implantation in the United States from 1993 to 2009: increasing complexity of patients and procedures.1993 年至 2009 年美国永久性心脏起搏器植入的趋势:患者和手术的复杂性不断增加。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Oct 16;60(16):1540-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.017. Epub 2012 Sep 19.

植入美敦力Micra经导管无导线起搏器系统后当日出院的安全性和可行性

The Safety and Feasibility of Same-Day Discharge After Implantation of MICRA Transcatheter Leadless Pacemaker System.

作者信息

Kiani Soroosh, Black George B, Rao Birju, Thakkar Nancy, Massad Christopher, Patel Akshar V, Lu Marvin Louis Roy, Merchant Faisal M, Hoskins Michael H, De Lurgio David B, Patel Anshul M, Shah Anand D, Leon Angel R, Westerman Stacy B, Lloyd Michael S, El-Chami Mikhael F

机构信息

Emory University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Disease.

Emory University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine.

出版信息

J Atr Fibrillation. 2019 Jun 30;12(1):2153. doi: 10.4022/jafib.2153. eCollection 2019 Jun.

DOI:10.4022/jafib.2153
PMID:31687066
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6811338/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Data suggests that same day discharge after implantation of trans-venous pacemakers is safe and feasible. We sought to determine whether same day discharge was feasible and safe following implantation of Medtronic MICRA leadless pacemakers.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified all patients undergoing MICRA placement at our institution between April 2014 to August 2018 (n=167). Patients were stratified into two groups: those discharged on the same day as their procedure (SD, n=25), and those observed for at least one night in the hospital (HD, n=142). The primary endpoint included a composite of major complications including: access site complications, new pericardial effusion, device dislodgement, and need for device revision up to approximately 45 days of follow up.

RESULTS

SD and HD had similar age (75±13 vs. 75±13 years, p=0.923), prevalence of male sex (49 vs. 44%, p=0.669), and frequency of high-grade heart block as an indication for pacing (38 vs. 32%, p=0.596). There were more Caucasians in the SD group (72 vs. 66%, p=0.038). The rate of the composite endpoint was statistically non-significantly higher in the HD group (3.5% vs. 0.0%, p=1.00). The rates of each individual components comprising the composite endpoint were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that in appropriately selected patients, same day discharge can occur safely following Micra leadless pacemaker implantation.

摘要

背景

数据表明,经静脉起搏器植入术后当日出院是安全可行的。我们试图确定美敦力MICRA无导线起搏器植入术后当日出院是否可行且安全。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2014年4月至2018年8月在我院接受MICRA植入的所有患者(n = 167)。患者被分为两组:手术当日出院组(SD,n = 25)和在医院观察至少一晚的组(HD,n = 142)。主要终点包括主要并发症的综合指标,包括:穿刺部位并发症、新发心包积液、装置移位以及随访约45天内进行装置翻修的需求。

结果

SD组和HD组年龄相似(75±13岁 vs. 75±13岁,p = 0.923),男性患病率相似(49% vs. 44%,p = 0.669),作为起搏指征的高度房室传导阻滞发生率相似(38% vs. 32%,p = 0.596)。SD组白种人更多(72% vs. 66%,p = 0.038)。HD组综合终点发生率在统计学上略高,但无显著差异(3.5% vs. 0.0%,p = 1.00)。组成综合终点的各个单项指标发生率在两组间相似。

结论

我们的数据表明,在适当选择的患者中,Micra无导线起搏器植入术后当日出院是安全的。