Suppr超能文献

经静脉起搏器植入禁忌患者的发病率和死亡率:无导线起搏器的经验。

Morbidity and mortality in patients precluded for transvenous pacemaker implantation: Experience with a leadless pacemaker.

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Virginia Commonwealth University/Pauley Heart Center, Richmond, Virginia.

Medtronic, Mounds View, Minnesota.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm. 2020 Dec;17(12):2056-2063. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.07.035. Epub 2020 Aug 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Micra transcatheter pacemaker is a safe and effective alternative to transvenous permanent pacemakers (TV-PPMs). However, the safety profile and mortality outcomes of Micra implantation in patients deemed poor candidates for TV-PPM are incompletely understood.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate safety and all-cause mortality in patients undergoing Micra implantation stratified by whether they were precluded for therapy with a TV-PPM.

METHODS

Patients from the Micra clinical trials were divided into groups on the basis of whether the implanter considered the patient to be precluded from receiving a TV-PPM. Micra groups were compared with one another as well as with a historical cohort of patients who received a single-chamber TV-PPM.

RESULTS

A total of 2817 patients underwent a Micra implantation attempt, of whom 546 (19%) patients deemed ineligible for TV-PPM implantation for reasons such as venous access issues or prior device infections. Both acute mortality (2.75% vs 1.32%; P=.022) and total mortality at 36 months (38.1% vs 20.6%; P<.001) were significantly higher in the precluded group than in the nonprecluded group. Mortality was similar among nonprecluded patients and patients implanted with a TV-PPM. The major complication rate through 36 months was similar between the 2 Micra groups (3.81% vs 4.30%; P=.40).

CONCLUSION

All-cause mortality is higher in Micra patients deemed ineligible for TV-PPM implantation than in nonprecluded Micra patients and those who received a TV-PPM, in part related to a higher incidence of chronic comorbidities in these patients. The overall major complication rate was low and did not differ by preclusion status.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Micra Post-Approval Registry ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02536118; Micra Continued Access Study ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02488681; Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02004873; Medtronic Product Surveillance Registry ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01524276.

摘要

背景

Micra 经导管心脏起搏器是一种安全有效的经静脉永久起搏器(TV-PPM)替代疗法。然而,对于被认为不适合 TV-PPM 治疗的患者,植入 Micra 的安全性概况和死亡率结果尚未完全了解。

目的

本研究旨在评估根据是否因治疗原因而被排除接受 TV-PPM 治疗,对接受 Micra 植入的患者进行分层的安全性和全因死亡率。

方法

根据植入者认为患者是否因治疗原因而被排除接受 TV-PPM 治疗,将 Micra 临床试验中的患者分为两组。将 Micra 组彼此进行比较,并与接受单腔 TV-PPM 的历史队列患者进行比较。

结果

共有 2817 例患者尝试植入 Micra,其中 546 例(19%)因静脉通路问题或先前的器械感染等原因被认为不适合 TV-PPM 植入。在预先组中,急性死亡率(2.75% vs. 1.32%;P=.022)和 36 个月时的总死亡率(38.1% vs. 20.6%;P<.001)均显著高于非预先组。非预先组和植入 TV-PPM 的患者之间的死亡率相似。两组 Micra 患者在 36 个月时的主要并发症发生率相似(3.81% vs. 4.30%;P=.40)。

结论

与非预先 Micra 患者和接受 TV-PPM 的患者相比,被认为不适合 TV-PPM 植入的 Micra 患者的全因死亡率更高,部分原因是这些患者患有更高的慢性合并症。总体主要并发症发生率较低,且不受排除状态的影响。

临床试验注册

Micra 批准后注册临床试验.gov 标识符:NCT02536118;Micra 持续准入研究临床试验.gov 标识符:NCT02488681;Micra 经导管起搏研究临床试验.gov 标识符:NCT02004873;美敦力产品监测注册临床试验.gov 标识符:NCT01524276。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验