Johnson Louise, Burridge Jane, Demain Sara, Ewings Sean
Stroke Unit, Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bournemouth, United Kingdom.
University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Nov 5;8(11):e14222. doi: 10.2196/14222.
Although implicit and explicit learning approaches have been well investigated in healthy populations, there is less evidence regarding the relative benefits of each approach in clinical practice. Studies in stroke typically investigate single elements of an implicit learning approach (ILA; eg, reduced quantity feedback or an external focus of attention) within controlled environments. These studies predominantly evaluate performance, with few measuring this over time (ie, learning). The relevance and transferability of current research evidence into stroke rehabilitation is therefore limited.
The objective of this study was to compare the ILA with standard care in the acute phase following stroke, to generate data and insights to inform the design of a definitive trial, and to understand patient and therapist perceptions of the ILA.
This is a multicenter, assessor-blind, cluster randomized controlled pilot trial with nested qualitative evaluation. Stroke units (clusters) will be randomized to either ILA (intervention) or standard care (control) arms. Therapy teams at the intervention sites will be trained in the ILA and provided with an intervention manual. Those at the control sites will have minimal input from the research team, other than for data collection. Consent will be provided at the individual participant level. Once enrolled, participants will receive rehabilitation that focuses on lower limb recovery, using the designated approach. Measures will be taken at baseline, every 2 weeks until the point of discharge from hospital, and at 3 months post stroke onset. Measures include the Fugl Meyer Assessment (motor leg subsection), modified Rivermead Mobility Index, Swedish Postural Adjustment in Stroke Scale, and achievement of mobility milestones. Fidelity of the treatment approach will be monitored using observational video analysis. Focus groups and interviews will be used to gain insight into the perceptions of trial participants and clinical teams.
The first site opened to recruitment in February 2019. The opening of a further 5 sites will be staggered throughout 2019. Results are expected in early 2021.
The findings from this mixed methods pilot study will be used to inform the design of a definitive study, comparing the ILA with standard care in acute stroke rehabilitation.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03792126; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03792126.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/14222.
尽管内隐学习和外显学习方法在健康人群中已得到充分研究,但关于每种方法在临床实践中的相对益处的证据较少。中风方面的研究通常在受控环境中调查内隐学习方法(ILA)的单个要素(例如,减少数量反馈或外部注意力焦点)。这些研究主要评估表现,很少有研究对其进行长期测量(即学习情况)。因此,当前研究证据对中风康复的相关性和可转移性有限。
本研究的目的是比较中风急性期的ILA与标准护理,以生成数据和见解,为确定性试验的设计提供信息,并了解患者和治疗师对ILA的看法。
这是一项多中心、评估者盲法、整群随机对照试验,并进行嵌套定性评估。中风单元(整群)将被随机分配到ILA(干预)组或标准护理(对照)组。干预地点的治疗团队将接受ILA培训并获得干预手册。对照地点的团队除数据收集外,将很少得到研究团队的投入。将在个体参与者层面获得同意。一旦入组,参与者将使用指定方法接受侧重于下肢恢复情况的康复治疗。将在基线、出院前每2周以及中风发作后3个月进行测量。测量指标包括Fugl Meyer评估(腿部运动部分)、改良Rivermead活动指数、瑞典中风姿势调整量表以及达到活动里程碑的情况。将使用观察性视频分析来监测治疗方法的保真度。将通过焦点小组和访谈来深入了解试验参与者和临床团队的看法。
第一个招募地点于2019年2月开放。另外五个地点将在2019年全年陆续开放。预计2021年初得出结果。
这项混合方法试点研究的结果将用于为确定性研究的设计提供信息,该确定性研究将比较ILA与急性中风康复中的标准护理。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03792126;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03792126。
国际注册报告识别码(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/14222。