• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus conventional oxygen therapy in patients after planned extubation.

作者信息

Luo Meng-Si, Huang Guan-Jiang, Wu Lun

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Affiliated to Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 3 Kangxin Road, Zhongshan, 528400, Guangdong, China.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, 310009, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2019 Nov 5;23(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2606-3.

DOI:10.1186/s13054-019-2606-3
PMID:31690331
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6829808/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9306/6829808/e893cfc3dda6/13054_2019_2606_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9306/6829808/e893cfc3dda6/13054_2019_2606_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9306/6829808/e893cfc3dda6/13054_2019_2606_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus conventional oxygen therapy in patients after planned extubation.计划性拔管后患者的高流量鼻导管吸氧疗法与传统吸氧疗法的比较
Crit Care. 2019 Nov 5;23(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2606-3.
2
Comparison between high-flow nasal oxygen cannula and conventional oxygen therapy after extubation in pediatric intensive care unit.儿科重症监护病房拔管后高流量鼻导管吸氧与传统氧疗的比较。
Turk J Pediatr. 2018;60(2):126-133. doi: 10.24953/turkjped.2018.02.002.
3
Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy on Reintubation in Low-Risk Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.低危患者拔管后使用高流量鼻导管与常规氧疗对再插管的影响：一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2016 Apr 5;315(13):1354-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.2711.
4
Effect of high-flow nasal cannula therapy on thirst sensation and dry mouth after extubation: A single-centre prospective cohort study.高流量鼻导管治疗对拔管后口渴感和口干的影响：一项单中心前瞻性队列研究。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2023 Feb;74:103339. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2022.103339. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
5
Effect of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy Versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy and Noninvasive Ventilation on Reintubation Rate in Adult Patients After Extubation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.高流量鼻导管氧疗与常规氧疗和无创通气对成人拔管后再插管率的影响：系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Intensive Care Med. 2018 Nov;33(11):609-623. doi: 10.1177/0885066617705118. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
6
High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy vs Continuous Positive Airway Pressure After Extubation and Liberation From Respiratory Support in Critically Ill Children.危重症儿童拔管及脱离呼吸支持后高流量鼻导管吸氧疗法与持续气道正压通气的比较
JAMA. 2022 Aug 23;328(8):776-777. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.11165.
7
High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy vs Continuous Positive Airway Pressure After Extubation and Liberation From Respiratory Support in Critically Ill Children-Reply.重症患儿拔管及脱离呼吸支持后高流量鼻导管吸氧疗法与持续气道正压通气的比较——回复
JAMA. 2022 Aug 23;328(8):777. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.11168.
8
High-flow nasal cannula can't be considered non-inferior to noninvasive ventilation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who develop respiratory failure after extubation.对于慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者拔管后发生呼吸衰竭的情况，高流量鼻导管吸氧不能被认为不劣于无创通气。
Crit Care. 2020 Nov 23;24(1):659. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03363-x.
9
Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Noninvasive Ventilation on Reintubation and Postextubation Respiratory Failure in High-Risk Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.高风险患者拔管后使用高流量鼻导管与无创通气对再插管和拔管后呼吸衰竭的影响：一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2016 Oct 18;316(15):1565-1574. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.14194.
10
High-Flow Nasal Cannula After Surgery-A Lateral Move From Conventional Oxygen Therapy?术后高流量鼻导管吸氧——是从传统氧疗的一次侧向转变？
Respir Care. 2020 Jan;65(1):131-132. doi: 10.4187/respcare.07604.

引用本文的文献

1
Early prediction of high flow nasal cannula therapy outcomes using a modified ROX index incorporating heart rate.使用纳入心率的改良ROX指数对高流量鼻导管治疗结果进行早期预测。
J Intensive Care. 2020 Jun 22;8:41. doi: 10.1186/s40560-020-00458-z. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus conventional oxygen therapy in patients after planned extubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.计划性拔管后患者使用高流量鼻导管吸氧与常规吸氧的比较：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2019 May 17;23(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2465-y.
2
Estimating required information size by quantifying diversity in random-effects model meta-analyses.通过量化随机效应模型荟萃分析中的多样性来估计所需的信息大小。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Dec 30;9:86. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-86.
3
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration.
用于报告评估医疗保健干预措施的系统评价和荟萃分析的PRISMA声明：解释与详述
BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2700. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2700.
4
Evidence based medicine (EBM) in practice: applying relative risk and relative risk reduction.循证医学在实践中的应用：运用相对危险度和相对危险度降低率
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Nov;99(11):2084-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.40949.x.