Suppr超能文献

基于互联网的前庭康复治疗,联合和不联合物理治疗支持,用于一般实践中 50 岁及以上慢性前庭综合征的成年人:三臂随机对照试验。

Internet based vestibular rehabilitation with and without physiotherapy support for adults aged 50 and older with a chronic vestibular syndrome in general practice: three armed randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ. 2019 Nov 5;367:l5922. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5922.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical effectiveness and safety of stand alone and blended internet based vestibular rehabilitation (VR) in the management of chronic vestibular syndromes in general practice.

DESIGN

Pragmatic, three armed, parallel group, individually randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

59 general practices in the Netherlands.

PARTICIPANTS

322 adults aged 50 and older with a chronic vestibular syndrome.

INTERVENTIONS

Stand alone VR comprising a six week, internet based intervention with weekly online sessions and daily exercises (10-20 minutes a day). In the blended VR group, the same internet based intervention was supplemented by face-to-face physiotherapy support (home visits in weeks 1 and 3). Participants in the usual care group received standard care from a general practitioner, without any restrictions.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was vestibular symptoms after six months as measured by the vertigo symptom scale-short form (VSS-SF range 0-60, clinically relevant difference ≥3 points). Secondary outcomes were dizziness related impairment, anxiety, depressive symptoms, subjective improvement of vestibular symptoms after three and six months, and adverse events.

RESULTS

In the intention-to-treat analysis, participants in the stand alone and blended VR groups had lower VSS-SF scores at six months than participants in the usual care group (adjusted mean difference -4.1 points, 95% confidence interval -5.8 to -2.5; and -3.5 points, -5.1 to -1.9, respectively). Similar differences in VSS-SF scores were seen at three months follow-up. Participants in the stand alone and blended VR groups also experienced less dizziness related impairment, less anxiety, and more subjective improvement of vestibular symptoms at three and six months. No serious adverse events related to online VR occurred during the trial.

CONCLUSION

Stand alone and blended internet based VR are clinically effective and safe interventions to treat adults aged 50 and older with a chronic vestibular syndrome. Online VR is an easily accessible form of treatment, with the potential to improve care for an undertreated group of patients in general practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Netherlands Trial Register NTR5712.

摘要

目的

研究独立式和混合式基于互联网的前庭康复(VR)在普通实践中治疗慢性前庭综合征的临床效果和安全性。

设计

实用、三臂、平行组、个体随机对照试验。

设置

荷兰 59 家普通诊所。

参与者

322 名年龄在 50 岁及以上的慢性前庭综合征成年人。

干预措施

独立式 VR 包括为期六周的基于互联网的干预,每周有在线课程和每日练习(每天 10-20 分钟)。在混合式 VR 组中,相同的基于互联网的干预由面对面物理治疗支持(第 1 周和第 3 周的家访)补充。常规护理组的参与者接受全科医生的标准护理,没有任何限制。

主要观察指标

六个月后,以眩晕症状量表短表(VSS-SF 范围 0-60,临床相关差异≥3 分)测量的前庭症状为主要结果。次要结果是头晕相关障碍、焦虑、抑郁症状、三个月和六个月后前庭症状的主观改善,以及不良事件。

结果

在意向治疗分析中,与常规护理组相比,独立式和混合式 VR 组参与者在六个月时的 VSS-SF 评分较低(校正平均差异-4.1 分,95%置信区间-5.8 至-2.5;和-3.5 分,-5.1 至-1.9)。在三个月随访时也观察到 VSS-SF 评分的相似差异。独立式和混合式 VR 组的参与者在三个月和六个月时也经历了较少的头晕相关障碍、较少的焦虑和更多的前庭症状主观改善。在试验过程中,没有与在线 VR 相关的严重不良事件。

结论

独立式和混合式基于互联网的 VR 是治疗 50 岁及以上慢性前庭综合征成年人的临床有效和安全干预措施。在线 VR 是一种易于获得的治疗形式,有可能改善普通实践中治疗不足的患者群体的护理。

试验注册

荷兰试验注册 NTR5712。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e32/6829201/6c99ea123d01/vanv051519.va.jpg

相似文献

5

引用本文的文献

2
Adherence to customized vestibular rehabilitation therapy: influencing factors and clinical implications in vestibulopathy.
Front Neurol. 2025 Feb 5;16:1538989. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1538989. eCollection 2025.
9
Wearable sensor and smartphone assisted vestibular physical therapy for multiple sclerosis: usability and outcomes.
Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 Jul 10;5:1406926. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1406926. eCollection 2024.
10
Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation in Dizziness: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.
Sensors (Basel). 2024 May 10;24(10):3028. doi: 10.3390/s24103028.

本文引用的文献

1
Vestibular rehabilitation: advances in peripheral and central vestibular disorders.
Curr Opin Neurol. 2019 Feb;32(1):137-144. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000632.
2
Predicting an Unfavorable Course of Dizziness in Older Patients.
Ann Fam Med. 2018 Sep;16(5):428-435. doi: 10.1370/afm.2289.
3
Different ways to estimate treatment effects in randomised controlled trials.
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018 Mar 28;10:80-85. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.03.008. eCollection 2018 Jun.
4
Prevalence, aetiologies and prognosis of the symptom dizziness in primary care - a systematic review.
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Feb 20;19(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0695-0.
5
7
Chronic vertigo: treat with exercise, not drugs.
BMJ. 2017 Aug 23;358:j3727. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3727.
10
Older adults' experiences of internet-based vestibular rehabilitation for dizziness: A longitudinal study.
Psychol Health. 2017 Nov;32(11):1327-1347. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2017.1310861. Epub 2017 Apr 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验