Suppr超能文献

目前缺乏指导脊髓刺激治疗脊髓损伤神经性疼痛的临床实践的证据:文献回顾与未来研究建议。

Current Evidence Lacking to Guide Clinical Practice for Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Treatment of Neuropathic Pain in Spinal Cord Injury: A Review of the Literature and a Proposal for Future Study.

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.

Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.

出版信息

Pain Pract. 2020 Mar;20(3):325-335. doi: 10.1111/papr.12855. Epub 2020 Feb 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Chronic pain is commonly reported in individuals with spinal cord injuries (SCIs), with recent prevalence reported as high as 80%. Uncontrolled pain is known to decrease quality of life, attenuate mood, and impact sleep. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for the treatment of refractory pain was first used in the SCI population in 1972. To date there have been no randomized controlled trials examining the effect of SCS on neuropathic pain post-SCI. A literature review in 2009 identified 27 studies, the majority prior to 2000, that included at least 1 patient with SCI. Given the significant advancements in the field of SCS, this review examines the updated evidence of SCS for the treatment of neuropathic pain in individuals with SCI and provides guidance on future investigations.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched. All published reports, case series, and clinical trials reviewing SCS for neuropathic pain that included at least 1 individual with SCI were included.

RESULTS

The initial search identified 376 reports, of which 22 met inclusion criteria, for a total of 69 patients. All reports were of very low quality. A majority of the reported patients were male, underwent tonic stimulation, and reportedly experienced improvement in pain and spasticity, with decreased use of pain medication.

CONCLUSIONS

The synthesized findings from primarily case studies support the safety of SCS in SCI with the suggestion of potential pain relief benefit; however, data from low-quality studies are insufficient for informing clinical practice. A well-designed, prospective clinical trial is proposed to further investigate this indication.

摘要

背景/目的:慢性疼痛在脊髓损伤(SCI)患者中较为常见,最近的患病率高达 80%。众所周知,疼痛控制不佳会降低生活质量、影响情绪和睡眠。1972 年,脊髓刺激(SCS)首次用于治疗难治性疼痛的 SCI 患者。迄今为止,尚无研究评估 SCS 对 SCI 后神经性疼痛的影响的随机对照试验。2009 年的文献回顾确定了 27 项研究,其中大多数是在 2000 年之前进行的,至少有 1 名 SCI 患者参与。鉴于 SCS 领域的重大进展,本次综述检查了 SCS 治疗 SCI 患者神经性疼痛的最新证据,并为未来的研究提供了指导。

方法

检索 MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 数据库。纳入所有发表的报告、病例系列和临床试验,这些研究均回顾了 SCS 治疗神经性疼痛,且至少包括 1 名 SCI 患者。

结果

最初的搜索共确定了 376 篇报告,其中 22 篇符合纳入标准,共有 69 名患者。所有报告的质量均非常低。报告中的大多数患者为男性,接受了强直刺激,据称疼痛和痉挛得到改善,同时减少了止痛药的使用。

结论

主要来自病例研究的综合研究结果支持 SCS 在 SCI 中的安全性,且可能具有缓解疼痛的益处;然而,低质量研究的数据不足以指导临床实践。建议进行一项设计良好的前瞻性临床试验,以进一步调查这一适应证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验