Mental Health and Wellbeing, Institute of Health and Wellbeing College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Department of Neurosurgery, Antwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium.
Lancet Neurol. 2014 Aug;13(8):844-54. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70120-6.
Since 1974, the Glasgow Coma Scale has provided a practical method for bedside assessment of impairment of conscious level, the clinical hallmark of acute brain injury. The scale was designed to be easy to use in clinical practice in general and specialist units and to replace previous ill-defined and inconsistent methods. 40 years later, the Glasgow Coma Scale has become an integral part of clinical practice and research worldwide. Findings using the scale have shown strong associations with those obtained by use of other early indices of severity and outcome. However, predictive statements should only be made in combination with other variables in a multivariate model. Individual patients are best described by the three components of the coma scale; whereas the derived total coma score should be used to characterise groups. Adherence to this principle and enhancement of the reliable practical use of the scale through continuing education of health professionals, standardisation across different settings, and consensus on methods to address confounders will maintain its role in clinical practice and research in the future.
自 1974 年以来,格拉斯哥昏迷量表为床边评估意识损伤提供了一种实用方法,而意识损伤是急性脑损伤的临床标志。该量表旨在易于在一般和专科病房的临床实践中使用,并取代以前定义不明确和不一致的方法。40 年后,格拉斯哥昏迷量表已成为全球临床实践和研究不可或缺的一部分。使用该量表的结果显示与使用其他早期严重程度和预后指标的结果具有很强的相关性。然而,预测性陈述只能在多变量模型中与其他变量结合做出。个体患者最好用昏迷量表的三个组成部分来描述;而衍生的总昏迷评分则应用于描述群体。通过对卫生专业人员进行持续教育、在不同环境下进行标准化以及就解决混杂因素的方法达成共识,坚持这一原则并增强量表的可靠实用,可以使其在未来的临床实践和研究中保持其作用。