Department of Laboratory Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Ob/Gyn & Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Dec 23;58(1). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01264-19.
Molecular tests to diagnose conditions involving the disruption of normal microbiota are difficult to optimize. Using Nugent-scored Gram stain (NS) as the reference standard, we evaluated the performance of 3 molecular assays for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis (BV) and examined the impact of an incremental increase in bacterial targets. The BD Affirm assay includes a DNA probe for , the Hologic transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) analyte-specific reagent (ASR) assay adds a second sp. target, and the recently cleared diagnostic use (IVD) Aptima BV assay includes a third target (). The diagnosis of vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) by the Affirm and vaginitis Hologic TMA ASR assays was assessed using microscopy for yeast as the reference standard. From May to December 2018, 111 women with vaginitis symptoms prompting the clinician to order an Affirm test were enrolled with informed consent for the collection of additional specimens. Clinicians accurately predicted BV as the most likely diagnosis for 71% of the 45 patients with BV. Coinfection occurred in 13.5% of patients. For BV, the specificity of the Aptima IVD assay (86.3%) was higher than the Affirm assay (60.6%, = 0.0002), but sensitivities were not significantly different. For VVC, the sensitivity of the ASR assay (100%) was higher than Affirm (75.9%; = 0.023) and the specificity of the Affirm assay (98.8%) was higher than the ASR assay (86.6%; = 0.004).
分子检测诊断正常微生物群紊乱相关疾病较难优化。本研究以 Nugent 评分革兰氏染色(NS)为参考标准,评估了 3 种分子检测方法对细菌性阴道病(BV)的诊断性能,并探讨了细菌靶标数量增加对诊断性能的影响。BD Affirm 检测法包含一条针对 16S rRNA 的 DNA 探针,Hologic 转录介导扩增(TMA)分析物特异试剂(ASR)检测法添加了第二个 sp. 目标,而新获批的 诊断用途(IVD) Aptima BV 检测法则包含第三个目标()。使用显微镜检查酵母作为参考标准,评估 Affirm 和 阴道病 Hologic TMA ASR 检测法对外阴阴道假丝酵母菌病(VVC)的诊断性能。本研究纳入了 2018 年 5 月至 12 月期间,因阴道炎症状促使医生开单 Affirm 检测的 111 名女性患者。征得患者同意采集额外样本。临床医生准确预测了 45 名 BV 患者中 71%最有可能的诊断为 BV。13.5%的患者存在混合感染。对于 BV,Aptima IVD 检测法(86.3%)的特异性高于 Affirm 检测法(60.6%,=0.0002),但敏感性无显著差异。对于 VVC,ASR 检测法(100%)的敏感性高于 Affirm 检测法(75.9%;=0.023),而 Affirm 检测法(98.8%)的特异性高于 ASR 检测法(86.6%;=0.004)。