Lamont Ronald F, van den Munckhof Ellen Ha, Luef Birgitte Møller, Vinter Christina Anne, Jørgensen Jan Stener
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Clinical Research, Research Unit of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Kløvervænget 10, 10th floor, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Division of Surgery, University College London, Northwick Park Institute of Medical Research Campus, London, HA1 3UJ, UK.
Fac Rev. 2020 Dec 9;9:21. doi: 10.12703/r/9-21. eCollection 2020.
"The bacterial vaginosis syndrome" has significant adverse effects for women and babies, including preterm birth and increased risk of acquisition of sexually transmitted infections and HIV. Currently, the gold standard for diagnosis is Gram stain microscopy of vaginal secretions, which is not readily available, is somewhat subjective, and does not differentiate between the likely different subtypes of vaginal dysbioses that may have different etiologies, microbiology, responses to antibiotics, and phenotypic outcomes. With new information from molecular-based, cultivation-independent studies, there is increasing interest in the use of molecular techniques for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. We reviewed the current evidence on and the rationale behind the use of molecular techniques for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. We found a number of commercially available molecular diagnostic tests, a few of which have US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and/or Conformité Européenne diagnostic (CE-IVD) approval, and we have compared their performance with respect to sensitivities and specificities. Molecular-based tests have the advantage of objectivity, quantification, detection of fastidious organisms, and validity for self-obtained vaginal swabs. The performance of the molecular tests against standard microscopy is impressive, but further education of users on interpretation is needed. Bacterial vaginosis is the major cause of vaginal dysbiosis and should be recognized for the threat it is to women's genital tract health. Quantitative assessment of microbial abundance, the diversity of other organisms present, specific primers for gene sequence regions, and clades and biovars of target microbes should be recognized and incorporated into future molecular diagnostic tests to better differentiate between vaginal eubiosis and dysbiosis.
“细菌性阴道病综合征” 对女性和婴儿有重大不良影响,包括早产以及感染性传播感染和艾滋病毒的风险增加。目前,诊断的金标准是阴道分泌物革兰氏染色显微镜检查,该方法不易获得,存在一定主观性,并且无法区分可能具有不同病因、微生物学特征、对抗生素的反应及表型结果的不同类型的阴道微生物失调。随着基于分子的、不依赖培养的研究提供了新信息,人们对使用分子技术诊断细菌性阴道病的兴趣日益浓厚。我们回顾了目前关于使用分子技术诊断细菌性阴道病的证据及其背后的原理。我们发现了一些市售的分子诊断测试,其中少数已获得美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)和/或欧洲符合性诊断(CE-IVD)批准,并且我们比较了它们在敏感性和特异性方面的表现。基于分子的测试具有客观性、可量化、能检测难培养微生物以及对自行采集的阴道拭子有效的优点。分子测试相对于标准显微镜检查的表现令人印象深刻,但需要对使用者进行关于结果解读的进一步培训。细菌性阴道病是阴道微生物失调的主要原因,应认识到它对女性生殖道健康构成的威胁。微生物丰度的定量评估、其他存在的生物体的多样性、基因序列区域的特异性引物以及目标微生物的进化枝和生物变种应得到认可并纳入未来的分子诊断测试中,以更好地区分阴道微生态平衡和失调。