Suppr超能文献

修复材料和陶瓷厚度对CAD\CAM 内冠的影响。

The impact of restorative material and ceramic thickness on CAD\CAM endocrowns.

作者信息

Tribst João-Paulo-Mendes, Dal Piva Amanda-Maria-de Oliveira, Madruga Camila-Ferreira-Leite, Valera Marcia-Carneiro, Bresciani Eduardo, Bottino Marco-Antonio, de Melo Renata-Marques

机构信息

DDs, MSc, PhD Student in Prosthodontics, Department of Dental Materials and Proshodontics, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Institute of Science and Technology, São José dos Campos / SP, Brazil.

Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Institute of Science and Technology, Av. Eng. Francisco José Longo, n° 777, Jardim São Dimas, 12245-000 São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Dent. 2019 Nov 1;11(11):e969-e977. doi: 10.4317/jced.56002. eCollection 2019 Nov.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endocrown restorations as a conservative approach to restore endodontically treated teeth still need investigation under fatigue and made in different materials. This study evaluated the effect of restorative material and restoration thickness on the maximum fracture load of endocrowns subjected to cyclic loading.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sixty (60) third molar teeth received an endocrown preparation with three different heights of remaining dental tissue (1.5, 3.0 or 4.5 mm). A leucite-based ceramic (LEU) and a lithium disilicate (LD) based ceramic were selected to manufacture the CAD/CAM endocrown restorations, totaling 6 groups (n=10). The specimens were subjected to fatigue loading (200N, 2 x 106 cycles, water) and then to the single load to failure test (1 mm/min crosshead speed). Data were analyzed by using two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (< 0.05).

RESULTS

All endocrowns survived the fatigue test. The thickness did not influence the restoration's fracture load (=0.548) instead the restorative material (=0.003). LD showed higher mean values (1714.43 N)A than LEU (1313.47 N)B.

CONCLUSIONS

Endocrowns manufactured with CAD/CAM lithium disilicate blocks showed superior fracture load than the leucite-based blocks after mechanical fatigue. Nevertheless, both materials presented acceptable survival and fracture load as long as the material's minimum thickness and the enamel adhesion are respected. Endocrown, CAD/CAM, Endodontically treated teeth, Failure load, Minimal intervention dentistry.

摘要

背景

作为一种修复根管治疗后牙齿的保守方法,嵌体冠修复在不同材料及疲劳情况下仍需进一步研究。本研究评估了修复材料和修复体厚度对承受循环加载的嵌体冠最大断裂载荷的影响。

材料与方法

60颗第三磨牙进行嵌体冠预备,保留三种不同高度的牙体组织(1.5、3.0或4.5mm)。选择白榴石基陶瓷(LEU)和二硅酸锂(LD)基陶瓷制作CAD/CAM嵌体冠修复体,共6组(n = 10)。对标本进行疲劳加载(200N,2×10⁶次循环,水),然后进行单载荷破坏试验(十字头速度1mm/min)。数据采用双向方差分析和Tukey检验进行分析(<0.05)。

结果

所有嵌体冠均通过疲劳试验。厚度对修复体的断裂载荷没有影响(=0.548),而修复材料有影响(=0.003)。LD的平均值(1714.43N)A高于LEU(1313.47N)B。

结论

机械疲劳后,用CAD/CAM二硅酸锂块制作的嵌体冠比白榴石基块体表现出更高的断裂载荷。然而,只要尊重材料的最小厚度和釉质粘结,两种材料都具有可接受的生存率和断裂载荷。嵌体冠、CAD/CAM、根管治疗后的牙齿、破坏载荷、微创牙科。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e08/6825739/61a65f6d289b/jced-11-e969-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验