• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Repositories for academic products/outputs: Latin American and Chilean visions.学术成果/产出库:拉丁美洲及智利的视角
F1000Res. 2019 Aug 28;8:1517. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.19976.1. eCollection 2019.
2
[Toward a model of communications in public health in Latin America and the Caribbean].[迈向拉丁美洲和加勒比地区公共卫生通信模式]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2005 Dec;18(6):427-38. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892005001000006.
3
[A scientometric view of Revista Médica de Chile].[对《智利医学杂志》的科学计量学视角分析]
Rev Med Chil. 2008 Aug;136(8):1065-72. Epub 2008 Oct 7.
4
Evaluating the impact of open access policies on research institutions.评估开放获取政策对研究机构的影响。
Elife. 2020 Sep 14;9:e57067. doi: 10.7554/eLife.57067.
5
[A epistemometric view of some biological disciplines in Chile].
Biol Res. 2002;35(1):95-9. doi: 10.4067/s0716-97602002000100012.
6
Illegal abortion in Latin America.拉丁美洲的非法堕胎。
IPPF Med Bull. 1982 Aug;16(4):1-2.
7
Robotic surgery across Latin America: a bibliometric analysis of research trends from 2009 to 2022.拉丁美洲的机器人手术:2009 年至 2022 年研究趋势的文献计量分析。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Mar 16;18(1):123. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01865-2.
8
[Claudio Costa Casaretto M.D. (1914-1999) in Revista Medica de Chile].[《智利医学杂志》中的克劳迪奥·科斯塔·卡萨雷托医学博士(1914 - 1999)]
Rev Med Chil. 1999 Oct;127(10):1264-8.
9
[The use of bibliographic databases by Spanish-speaking Latin American biomedical researchers: a cross-sectional study].[西班牙语拉丁美洲生物医学研究人员对文献数据库的使用:一项横断面研究]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2005 Apr;17(4):230-6. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892005000400003.
10
Systematic review of Latin American national oral health surveys in adults.拉丁美洲成人全国口腔健康调查的系统评价
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2018 Aug;46(4):328-335. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12379. Epub 2018 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Paying reviewers and regulating the number of papers may help fix the peer-review process.向审稿人支付报酬并规范论文数量可能有助于修复同行评审过程。
F1000Res. 2024 Aug 27;13:439. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.148985.1. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015.评估 2010 年至 2015 年期间《自然》和《科学》杂志上社会科学实验的可重复性。
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Sep;2(9):637-644. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
2
The open access mandate: Be careful what you wish for.开放获取授权:愿望需谨慎。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2019 Nov;53(11):1044-1046. doi: 10.1177/0004867419864436. Epub 2019 Jul 21.
3
Resist calls for replicability in the humanities.抵制人文科学中对可重复性的要求。
Nature. 2018 Aug;560(7716):29. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-05845-z.
4
Humanities need a replication drive too.人文学科也需要一个复制驱动。
Nature. 2018 Jun;558(7710):372. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-05454-w.
5
The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles.开放获取(OA)的现状:对开放获取文章的患病率和影响的大规模分析。
PeerJ. 2018 Feb 13;6:e4375. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4375. eCollection 2018.
6
Reproducibility vs. Replicability: A Brief History of a Confused Terminology.可重复性与可复制性:一个混淆术语的简史
Front Neuroinform. 2018 Jan 18;11:76. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2017.00076. eCollection 2017.
7
Reproducible and reusable research: are journal data sharing policies meeting the mark?可重复和可再利用的研究:期刊数据共享政策达标了吗?
PeerJ. 2017 Apr 25;5:e3208. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3208. eCollection 2017.
8
On data availability, reproducibility and reuse.关于数据的可用性、可重复性和再利用。
Nat Cell Biol. 2017 Mar 31;19(4):259. doi: 10.1038/ncb3506.
9
What does research reproducibility mean?研究的可重复性是什么意思?
Sci Transl Med. 2016 Jun 1;8(341):341ps12. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027.
10
The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review.开放获取的学术、经济和社会影响:基于证据的综述。
F1000Res. 2016 Apr 11;5:632. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.8460.3. eCollection 2016.

学术成果/产出库:拉丁美洲及智利的视角

Repositories for academic products/outputs: Latin American and Chilean visions.

作者信息

Torres Leandro, Hartley Ricardo

机构信息

Instituto de Investigación e Innovación en Salud, Universidad Central de Chile, Lord Cochrane 417, Santiago, 8330507, Chile.

Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad de las Américas, Av. Manuel Montt 948, Providencia, Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

F1000Res. 2019 Aug 28;8:1517. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.19976.1. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.12688/f1000research.19976.1
PMID:31700616
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6820816/
Abstract

Open access policies have been progressing since the beginning of this century. Important global initiatives, both public and private, have set the tone for what we understand by open access. The emergence of tools and web platforms for open access (both legal and illegal) have placed the focus of the discussion on open access to knowledge, both for academics and for the general public, who finance such research through their taxes, particularly in Latin America. This historically unnoticed discussion must, we believe, be discussed publicly, given the characteristics of the Latin American scientific community, as well as its funding sources. This article includes an overview of what is meant by open access and describes the origins of the term, both in its philosophical sense and in its practical sense, expressed in the global declarations of Berlin and Bethesda. It also includes the notion of open access managed (or not) by some reputable institutions in Chile, such as CONICYT (National Commission for Scientific and Technological Research) and higher education institutions reputed nationally, such as the Universdad de Chile and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Various Latin American initiatives related to open access (Scielo, Redalyc, among others) are described, as well as the presence of Chilean documents in those platforms. The national institutional repositories are listed, as well as their current status and a discussion about what open access has implied in Latin America and its importance for the replicability of the investigations carried out locally. Finally, we describe some governmental initiatives (mainly legislative) at the Latin American level and propose some recommendations regarding the promotion and implementation of repositories for the access to scientific data (for access and replication purposes) of the national research.

摘要

自本世纪初以来,开放获取政策一直在不断发展。重要的全球倡议,包括公共和私人倡议,为我们对开放获取的理解奠定了基调。开放获取工具和网络平台(包括合法和非法的)的出现,将关于知识开放获取的讨论焦点,放在了学术界和普通公众身上,后者通过纳税为这类研究提供资金,在拉丁美洲尤其如此。鉴于拉丁美洲科学界及其资金来源的特点,我们认为,这场历史上未被关注的讨论必须公开进行。本文概述了开放获取的含义,并描述了该术语在哲学意义和实践意义上的起源,这在柏林和贝塞斯达的全球宣言中有所体现。它还包括智利一些著名机构(如国家科学技术研究委员会)以及国内知名高等教育机构(如智利大学和智利天主教大学)对开放获取的管理(或未管理)概念。文中描述了与开放获取相关的各种拉丁美洲倡议(如科学电子图书馆在线、学术知识免费获取数据库等),以及智利文献在这些平台上的情况。列出了国家机构知识库及其当前状态,并讨论了开放获取在拉丁美洲意味着什么及其对当地开展的研究可重复性的重要性。最后,我们描述了拉丁美洲层面的一些政府举措(主要是立法方面)并就促进和实施用于获取国家研究科学数据(用于获取和复制目的)的知识库提出了一些建议。