Suppr超能文献

学术成果/产出库:拉丁美洲及智利的视角

Repositories for academic products/outputs: Latin American and Chilean visions.

作者信息

Torres Leandro, Hartley Ricardo

机构信息

Instituto de Investigación e Innovación en Salud, Universidad Central de Chile, Lord Cochrane 417, Santiago, 8330507, Chile.

Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad de las Américas, Av. Manuel Montt 948, Providencia, Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

F1000Res. 2019 Aug 28;8:1517. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.19976.1. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Open access policies have been progressing since the beginning of this century. Important global initiatives, both public and private, have set the tone for what we understand by open access. The emergence of tools and web platforms for open access (both legal and illegal) have placed the focus of the discussion on open access to knowledge, both for academics and for the general public, who finance such research through their taxes, particularly in Latin America. This historically unnoticed discussion must, we believe, be discussed publicly, given the characteristics of the Latin American scientific community, as well as its funding sources. This article includes an overview of what is meant by open access and describes the origins of the term, both in its philosophical sense and in its practical sense, expressed in the global declarations of Berlin and Bethesda. It also includes the notion of open access managed (or not) by some reputable institutions in Chile, such as CONICYT (National Commission for Scientific and Technological Research) and higher education institutions reputed nationally, such as the Universdad de Chile and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Various Latin American initiatives related to open access (Scielo, Redalyc, among others) are described, as well as the presence of Chilean documents in those platforms. The national institutional repositories are listed, as well as their current status and a discussion about what open access has implied in Latin America and its importance for the replicability of the investigations carried out locally. Finally, we describe some governmental initiatives (mainly legislative) at the Latin American level and propose some recommendations regarding the promotion and implementation of repositories for the access to scientific data (for access and replication purposes) of the national research.

摘要

自本世纪初以来,开放获取政策一直在不断发展。重要的全球倡议,包括公共和私人倡议,为我们对开放获取的理解奠定了基调。开放获取工具和网络平台(包括合法和非法的)的出现,将关于知识开放获取的讨论焦点,放在了学术界和普通公众身上,后者通过纳税为这类研究提供资金,在拉丁美洲尤其如此。鉴于拉丁美洲科学界及其资金来源的特点,我们认为,这场历史上未被关注的讨论必须公开进行。本文概述了开放获取的含义,并描述了该术语在哲学意义和实践意义上的起源,这在柏林和贝塞斯达的全球宣言中有所体现。它还包括智利一些著名机构(如国家科学技术研究委员会)以及国内知名高等教育机构(如智利大学和智利天主教大学)对开放获取的管理(或未管理)概念。文中描述了与开放获取相关的各种拉丁美洲倡议(如科学电子图书馆在线、学术知识免费获取数据库等),以及智利文献在这些平台上的情况。列出了国家机构知识库及其当前状态,并讨论了开放获取在拉丁美洲意味着什么及其对当地开展的研究可重复性的重要性。最后,我们描述了拉丁美洲层面的一些政府举措(主要是立法方面)并就促进和实施用于获取国家研究科学数据(用于获取和复制目的)的知识库提出了一些建议。

相似文献

5
[A epistemometric view of some biological disciplines in Chile].
Biol Res. 2002;35(1):95-9. doi: 10.4067/s0716-97602002000100012.
10
Systematic review of Latin American national oral health surveys in adults.拉丁美洲成人全国口腔健康调查的系统评价
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2018 Aug;46(4):328-335. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12379. Epub 2018 Apr 27.

本文引用的文献

2
The open access mandate: Be careful what you wish for.开放获取授权:愿望需谨慎。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2019 Nov;53(11):1044-1046. doi: 10.1177/0004867419864436. Epub 2019 Jul 21.
4
Humanities need a replication drive too.人文学科也需要一个复制驱动。
Nature. 2018 Jun;558(7710):372. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-05454-w.
9
What does research reproducibility mean?研究的可重复性是什么意思?
Sci Transl Med. 2016 Jun 1;8(341):341ps12. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验