Kansai Rosai Hospital, Cardiovascular Center, Amagasaki, Japan.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 Dec;30(12):2834-2840. doi: 10.1111/jce.14263. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
A recently introduced grid mapping catheter (GMC) is designed for better electrode-tissue contact and can collect bipolar signals both along and across the splines, which may allow more efficient voltage map generation independent of propagation direction. We compared the GMC with a conventional circular mapping catheter (CMC) for left atrial (LA) voltage mapping.
This study included 20 consecutive patients undergoing repeat ablation for recurrent atrial fibrillation who had demonstrated LA low-voltage areas (LVAs, <0.10 mV). Following pulmonary vein isolation, LA voltage mapping was performed twice, once using the GMC and once using the CMC.
Voltage mapping was more efficient using the GMC than the CMC in terms of mapping time (459 [404, 543] vs 602 [496, 814] seconds; P = .014) and the number of mapping points (2446 [2099, 3104] vs 1841 [1494, 2314]; P = .002). The incidence of catheter-induced ectopies was lower (44 [28, 62] vs 114 [74, 188]; P < .0001) using the GMC. The GMC utilizing all bipoles detected LVAs in 85% of patients with LVAs detected by CMC. LVA measurements were significantly smaller on maps generated by the GMC using bipoles along or across the splines than those measured with the CMC (11.1 [4.6, 17.2] or 9.7 [2.5, 16.0] vs 16.4 [6.8, 26.8] cm ; P = .008 and P = .001, respectively), and were even smaller when using all bipoles (7.9 [1.1, 13.5] cm , P = .0001).
The GMC allowed a more efficient mapping procedure and enabled more selective identification of LVAs with smaller LVA size.
最近推出的栅格标测导管(GMC)旨在改善电极-组织接触,并可沿和横跨叉齿采集双极信号,这可能使电压图的生成更有效,而与传播方向无关。我们比较了 GMC 与传统的圆形标测导管(CMC)在左心房(LA)电压标测中的应用。
这项研究纳入了 20 例因复发性房颤而接受再次消融的连续患者,这些患者均表现出 LA 低电压区(LVAs,<0.10 mV)。在肺静脉隔离后,LA 电压标测分别使用 GMC 和 CMC 进行两次。
就标测时间(459 [404, 543] 与 602 [496, 814] 秒;P=0.014)和标测点数量(2446 [2099, 3104] 与 1841 [1494, 2314];P=0.002)而言,GMC 比 CMC 更有效。使用 GMC 时,导管诱发的异位搏动发生率较低(44 [28, 62] 与 114 [74, 188];P<0.0001)。GMC 利用所有双极可以检测到 CMC 检测到的 LVAs 的 85%患者的 LVAs。使用 GMC 时,沿或横跨叉齿的双极检测到的 LVA 测量值明显小于使用 CMC 测量到的 LVA 测量值(11.1 [4.6, 17.2] 或 9.7 [2.5, 16.0] 与 16.4 [6.8, 26.8] cm;P=0.008 和 P=0.001),而使用所有双极时更小(7.9 [1.1, 13.5] cm,P=0.0001)。
GMC 允许更有效的标测程序,并能更有选择性地识别较小 LVA 尺寸的 LVAs。