Suppr超能文献

心房颤动患者左心房非肺静脉基质的新解释

A new interpretation of nonpulmonary vein substrates of the left atrium in patients with atrial fibrillation.

作者信息

Rillo Mariano, Palamà Zefferino, Punzi Raffaele, Vitanza Salvatore, Aloisio Angelo, Polini Silvia, Tucci Antonella, Pollastrelli Annalisa, Zonno Francesco, Anastasia Antonio, Giannattasio Cesare Franco, My Luigi

机构信息

Arrhythmology Service Division of Cardiology - Casa di Cura Villa Verde Taranto Italy.

Abbott Medica Italia srl Sesto San Giovanni (Mi) Italy.

出版信息

J Arrhythm. 2021 Feb 22;37(2):338-347. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12521. eCollection 2021 Apr.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Substrate analysis of the left atrium in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation has limitations when performed by means of simple bipolar acquisition.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence of low-voltage zones (LVZs) through maps constructed by means of various catheters: multipolar (MC), omnipolar (OC), and circular catheters (CMCs) with the 3D electro-anatomical systems (3d-S) CARTO3 and EnSite Precision.

METHODS

To assess LVZs, we acquired maps by means of CMC and MC in the voltage range 0.05-0.5 mV in 70 consecutive patients in sinus rhythm. In the case of OC only, we made an intra-patient comparison of bipolar maps constructed by means of the along and across, and HD-Wave configurations of the EnSite 3d-S in the ranges of 0.05-0.5 and 0.5-1.0 mV. On the basis of this comparison, we chose the range that best identified LVZs as a set of different colors (SDC) compatible with patchy fibrosis (qualitative analysis). Subsequently, we detected the voltage values corresponding to purple and gray points, close to SDC, and the value inside corresponding to blue, green, and red colors, and we evaluated the color change in other voltage ranges. Finally, we performed a quantitative analysis of LVZs by applying the qualitative characteristics described above.

RESULTS

On the basis of our settings, for OC, the optimal range identifying LVZs was 0.3-0.6 mV. OC revealed smaller LVZs than MC ( < .05 or  < .001), except in the lateral wall. No significant differences were observed between CMCs.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, OC does not present the limits of bipolar HD maps, though further studies are needed in order to confirm that 0.3-0.6 mV is the optimal voltage range within which to identify LVZs.

摘要

背景

在房颤消融患者中,通过简单双极采集对左心房进行基质分析存在局限性。

目的

通过使用各种导管构建的图谱评估低电压区(LVZ)的发生率,这些导管包括多极导管(MC)、全极导管(OC)以及与三维电解剖系统(3d-S)CARTO3和EnSite Precision配套的环形导管(CMC)。

方法

为评估LVZ,我们在70例窦性心律的连续患者中,通过CMC和MC在0.05 - 0.5 mV的电压范围内采集图谱。仅对于OC,我们在患者体内比较了通过EnSite 3d-S的沿径、横径和高清波配置在0.05 - 0.5 mV和0.5 - 1.0 mV范围内构建的双极图谱。基于此比较,我们选择最能识别LVZ的范围作为与斑片状纤维化兼容的一组不同颜色(SDC)(定性分析)。随后,我们检测与SDC附近的紫色和灰色点对应的电压值,以及内部对应蓝色、绿色和红色的电压值,并评估其他电压范围内的颜色变化。最后,我们通过应用上述定性特征对LVZ进行定量分析。

结果

根据我们的设置,对于OC,识别LVZ的最佳范围是0.3 - 0.6 mV。除侧壁外,OC显示的LVZ比MC小(<0.05或<0.001)。CMC之间未观察到显著差异。

结论

根据我们的经验,OC不存在双极高清图谱的局限性,不过需要进一步研究以确认0.3 - 0.6 mV是识别LVZ的最佳电压范围。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dd4/8021999/4f0a9e16d66d/JOA3-37-338-g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验