• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理讨论论坛作为远程护理亲属健康促进措施的适用性和潜力:来自奥地利上奥地利州的证据。

On the Suitability and Potential of Nursing Care Discussion Forums as a Health Promotion Measure for Long-Distance Caregiving Relatives: Evidence from Upper Austria.

作者信息

Fischer Tatjana, Jobst Markus

机构信息

Institute of Spatial Planning, Environmental Planning and Land Rearrangement, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Peter-Jordan-Straße 82, 1190 Vienna, Austria.

Department for Geodesy and Geoinformation, Research Group Cartography, Vienna University of Technology, Erzherzog-Johann-Platz 1/120-6, 1040 Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2019 Nov 7;7(4):139. doi: 10.3390/healthcare7040139.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare7040139
PMID:31703385
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6955801/
Abstract

: The number of persons who have to overcome extensive geographical distances for caring for their older parent(s), hereinafter referred to as long-distance caregiving relatives (LDCs), is rising. However, in the non-English-speaking Global North, little is known about the LDCs' health literacy and the design of tailor-made health promotion measures for this target-group. Using the example of nursing care discussion forums (NCDF), this paper reflects the requirements and (future) potential of professionally-lead support groups for LDCs on the case-study example of Upper Austria. : In order to approach this unexplored topic considering spatial-related aspects, a qualitative-explorative study design was chosen, focusing on the providers' perspective. A written survey among all NCDF-group leaders was carried out. : LDCs do not make use of NCDFs at present. It is considered that this is above all for time constraints, lack of information and location-based problems of fit. This applies for urban as well as rural contexts. : LDCs need more attention in public health. Suitable NCDFs have to be located in the LCDs' residential municipalities and have to fulfill different requirements from those of local caregiving relatives, particularly with regard to purpose and scope.

摘要

需要跨越广阔地理距离照顾年迈父母的人数正在上升,以下简称远程照护亲属(LDCs)。然而,在非英语国家的全球北方地区,人们对LDCs的健康素养以及针对这一目标群体量身定制的健康促进措施的设计了解甚少。本文以上奥地利州的护理讨论论坛(NCDF)为例,反映了专业引领的LDCs支持小组的要求和(未来)潜力。为了从空间相关方面探讨这个未被探索的主题,我们选择了定性探索性研究设计,重点关注提供者的视角。对所有NCDF小组组长进行了书面调查。目前,LDCs并未利用NCDF。据认为,这主要是由于时间限制、信息缺乏以及基于地点的适配问题。这在城市和农村环境中都适用。LDCs在公共卫生方面需要更多关注。合适的NCDF必须设在LDCs居住的市镇,并且必须满足与当地照护亲属不同的要求,特别是在目的和范围方面。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ad/6955801/cccba4f4e935/healthcare-07-00139-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ad/6955801/16a0e1e57e6e/healthcare-07-00139-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ad/6955801/cccba4f4e935/healthcare-07-00139-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ad/6955801/16a0e1e57e6e/healthcare-07-00139-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ad/6955801/cccba4f4e935/healthcare-07-00139-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
On the Suitability and Potential of Nursing Care Discussion Forums as a Health Promotion Measure for Long-Distance Caregiving Relatives: Evidence from Upper Austria.护理讨论论坛作为远程护理亲属健康促进措施的适用性和潜力:来自奥地利上奥地利州的证据。
Healthcare (Basel). 2019 Nov 7;7(4):139. doi: 10.3390/healthcare7040139.
2
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
3
Long-Distance Caregivers' Use Of Supportive Services.长途照护者对支持性服务的使用情况。
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2022 Aug-Sep;65(6):618-634. doi: 10.1080/01634372.2021.2009079. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
4
Capturing the Spatial Relatedness of Long-Distance Caregiving: A Mixed-Methods Approach.捕捉长途照护的空间关联性:一种混合方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 2;17(17):6406. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176406.
5
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
6
7
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
8
Web-based Discussion Forums on Pregnancy Complaints and Maternal Health Literacy in Norway: A Qualitative Study.挪威基于网络的妊娠相关问题讨论论坛与孕产妇健康素养:一项定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2016 May 26;18(5):e113. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5270.
9
[Distance caregiving : Empirical findings from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe].[远程照护:来自欧洲健康、老龄化与退休调查的实证研究结果]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2019 Oct;52(6):529-536. doi: 10.1007/s00391-019-01605-4. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
10
[Caregiver burden in relatives of persons with schizophrenia: an overview of measure instruments].[精神分裂症患者亲属的照顾者负担:测量工具概述]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):137-47.

引用本文的文献

1
Capturing the Spatial Relatedness of Long-Distance Caregiving: A Mixed-Methods Approach.捕捉长途照护的空间关联性:一种混合方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 2;17(17):6406. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176406.

本文引用的文献

1
[Distance caregiving? : A qualitative interview study with distance caregivers].[远程照护?:一项对远程照护者的定性访谈研究]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2019 Oct;52(6):539-545. doi: 10.1007/s00391-019-01607-2. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
2
[Distance caregiving : Empirical findings from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe].[远程照护:来自欧洲健康、老龄化与退休调查的实证研究结果]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2019 Oct;52(6):529-536. doi: 10.1007/s00391-019-01605-4. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
3
[Current findings on distance caregiving : What do we know and what do we not (yet) know?].
[远程照护的当前研究结果:我们知道什么以及我们(目前)还不知道什么?]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2019 Oct;52(6):521-528. doi: 10.1007/s00391-019-01596-2. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
4
Is training for informal caregivers and their older persons helpful? A systematic review.对非正式照护者及其老年人进行培训是否有帮助?系统评价。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2019 Jul-Aug;83:66-74. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
5
Realist Review: Understanding Effectiveness of Intervention Programs for Dementia Caregivers.现实主义综述:理解痴呆症护理者干预项目的有效性
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2019 Feb;13(1):11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
6
Carer-related research and knowledge: Findings from a scoping review.与照顾者相关的研究与知识:一项范围综述的结果
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Jan;27(1):55-67. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12586. Epub 2018 May 30.
7
Social support and subjective burden in caregivers of adults and older adults: A meta-analysis.成人及老年人照料者的社会支持与主观负担:一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 2;13(1):e0189874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189874. eCollection 2018.
8
Shanghai declaration on promoting health in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.《关于在<2030年可持续发展议程>中促进健康的上海宣言》
Health Promot Int. 2017 Feb 1;32(1):7-8. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daw103.
9
Distance caregiving a family member with cancer: A review of the literature on distance caregiving and recommendations for future research.对患癌家庭成员的远程照护:关于远程照护的文献综述及对未来研究的建议
World J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr 10;7(2):214-9. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v7.i2.214.
10
A systematic review of social support interventions for caregivers of people with dementia: Are they doing what they promise?对痴呆症患者照料者社会支持干预措施的系统评价:它们是否兑现了承诺?
Maturitas. 2016 Mar;85:117-30. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.12.008. Epub 2016 Jan 4.