Suppr超能文献

冷冻胚胎解冻移植中,与人工周期相比,刺激周期可提高活产率。

Higher live birth rate with stimulated rather than artificial cycle for frozen-thawed embryo transfer.

机构信息

AP-HP, Unité de Médecine de la Reproduction, Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, 46 rue Henri Huchard, 75018 Paris, France.

Université Paris-Descartes, Laboratoire Psychopathologie et Processus de Santé, 71 avenue Edouard Vaillant, 92774 Boulogne-Billancourt, France.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Dec;243:144-149. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.10.040. Epub 2019 Oct 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study which endometrial preparation allows a better ongoing pregnancy rates (OPR) and live birth rate (LBR) after frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) between mild gonadotropin ovarian stimulation (OS) and artificial cycles (AC).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective follow-up study including all FET performed in one fertility center from 2013 to 2016. In the OS group, gonadotropins were followed by r-hCG triggering. Vaginal micronized progesterone (200 mg/day) was given systematically. In the AC group, estradiol (E2) was started on Day 1. Vaginal micronized progesterone (600 mg/d) was added to E2 for 12 weeks. Data were analyzed using a multiple regression model.

RESULTS

Among 1021 FETs, 35% underwent OS preparation, 65% had an AC. As expected, patients in the AC group suffered more from endometriosis (18.5% vs. 12.9%; p = .021) and polycystic ovarian syndrome (21.7% vs. 10.9%; p < .0001) than patients in the OS group. There was no difference between groups with respect to endometrial thickness, number of embryos transferred, development stage at FET, cryopreservation technique. Despite a similar clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) (24.4% vs. 20.8%; p = .189), the OPR was significantly higher in the OS than in the AC group (17.9% vs. 11%; p = .002), leading to an increased LBR (17.1% vs. 9.8%; p < .001). After adjusting for parameters usually linked to early pregnancy losses or potential bias (patient age at freezing, smoking status, PCOS, endometriosis, rank of transfer and previous miscarriages), the results remained significant.

CONCLUSION

Despite a similar CPR, LBR was significantly higher with mild OS than with the AC preparation, even after adjusting for potential confounders. In light of these results, the first-line endometrial preparation could be OS instead of an AC. In an AC, a potential defect of the luteal phase may exist, treatment could be optimized to avoid pregnancy losses. A randomized controlled trial should be undertaken to assess the role of OS and ACs in FET.

摘要

目的

研究轻度促性腺激素卵巢刺激(OS)与人工周期(AC)之间,哪种子宫内膜准备能在冻融胚胎移植(FET)后获得更好的持续妊娠率(OPR)和活产率(LBR)。

研究设计

这是一项回顾性随访研究,纳入了 2013 年至 2016 年在一家生育中心进行的所有 FET。在 OS 组中,促性腺激素治疗后用 r-hCG 触发排卵。阴道给予微粒化黄体酮(200mg/天)。在 AC 组中,第 1 天开始给予雌二醇(E2)。阴道给予微粒化黄体酮(600mg/d)加 E2 治疗 12 周。使用多元回归模型进行数据分析。

结果

在 1021 例 FET 中,35%接受 OS 准备,65%接受 AC。正如预期的那样,AC 组患者的子宫内膜异位症(18.5%比 12.9%;p=0.021)和多囊卵巢综合征(21.7%比 10.9%;p<0.0001)发病率高于 OS 组。两组间子宫内膜厚度、胚胎移植数量、FET 时胚胎发育阶段、冷冻保存技术无差异。尽管临床妊娠率(CPR)相似(24.4%比 20.8%;p=0.189),但 OS 组的 OPR 明显高于 AC 组(17.9%比 11%;p=0.002),导致活产率(LBR)升高(17.1%比 9.8%;p<0.001)。调整通常与早期妊娠丢失或潜在偏倚相关的参数(冻融时患者年龄、吸烟状况、PCOS、子宫内膜异位症、移植等级和既往流产)后,结果仍然显著。

结论

尽管 CPR 相似,但与 AC 准备相比,轻度 OS 的 LBR 显著更高,即使调整了潜在的混杂因素也是如此。鉴于这些结果,一线子宫内膜准备可以是 OS 而不是 AC。在 AC 中,黄体期可能存在潜在缺陷,治疗可以优化以避免妊娠丢失。应进行随机对照试验来评估 OS 和 AC 在 FET 中的作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验