Suppr超能文献

基于排卵的冻融胚胎移植周期在普通人群和无排卵女性中可能实现更高的妊娠率。

Ovulatory-Based FET Cycles May Achieve Higher Pregnancy Rates in the General Population and among Anovulatory Women.

作者信息

Aslih Nardin, Dorzia Dore, Atzmon Yuval, Estrada Daniella, Ellenbogen Adrian, Bilgory Asaf, Shalom-Paz Einat

机构信息

IVF Unit, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera 3810101, Israel.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 11;10(4):703. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040703.

Abstract

This study evaluated which endometrial preparation protocol in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles provides the best results for polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) patients and the general population. This retrospective study of 634 FET cycles was conducted 2016-2018. Cycles were divided into Group A: Artificial endometrial preparations for FET (aFET; = 348), Group B: Ovulatory cycle ( = 286) to compare two methods of endometrial preparation for FET. Artificial endometrial preparation with exogenous estrogen and progesterone versus natural ovulation cycles, modified natural cycles using hCG for the final triggering and letrozole-induced ovulation with hCG. Anovulatory patients were analyzed separately. Anovulatory PCOS patients had significantly higher pregnancy rates with letrozole treatment compared with aFET cycles (44% vs. 22.5%; = 0.044). For the entire cohort, ovulatory cycles and aFET were similar in terms of patient characteristics, demographics, infertility causes, treatment protocols and number of embryos transferred. Although the mean ESHRE score of the transferred embryos was higher in the aFET group, we found higher clinical pregnancy rate in the ovulatory cycle FET (41.3% vs. 27.3%, < 0.0001). A better pregnancy rate was found after ovulatory cycle FET. In the ovulatory cycles, the outcome of letrozole-induced and non-induced cycles were comparable. PCOS patients, as well as the general population, may benefit from ovulation induced FET cycles, with significantly better outcomes in FET in ovulatory cycles.

摘要

本研究评估了在冻融胚胎移植(FET)周期中,哪种子宫内膜准备方案能为多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)患者和普通人群带来最佳结果。这项对634个FET周期的回顾性研究于2016年至2018年进行。周期被分为A组:FET的人工子宫内膜准备(aFET;n = 348),B组:排卵周期(n = 286),以比较两种FET的子宫内膜准备方法。外源性雌激素和孕激素的人工子宫内膜准备与自然排卵周期、使用hCG进行最终触发的改良自然周期以及来曲唑诱导排卵加hCG进行比较。无排卵患者单独分析。与aFET周期相比,来曲唑治疗的无排卵PCOS患者妊娠率显著更高(44%对22.5%;P = 0.044)。对于整个队列,排卵周期和aFET在患者特征、人口统计学、不孕原因、治疗方案和移植胚胎数量方面相似。尽管aFET组移植胚胎的平均ESHRE评分更高,但我们发现排卵周期FET的临床妊娠率更高(41.3%对27.3%,P < 0.0001)。排卵周期FET后妊娠率更高。在排卵周期中,来曲唑诱导周期和未诱导周期的结果相当。PCOS患者以及普通人群可能从诱导排卵的FET周期中获益,排卵周期FET的结果明显更好。

相似文献

7
Cycle regimens for frozen-thawed embryo transfer.冻融胚胎移植的周期方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 5;7(7):CD003414. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003414.pub3.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验