• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

第三方监测是否提高了环境数据质量?对中国空气污染数据的分析。

Has third-party monitoring improved environmental data quality? An analysis of air pollution data in China.

机构信息

School of Management, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou City, 730000, P.R. China.

Department of Public Policy, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, P.R. China.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2020 Jan 1;253:109698. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109698. Epub 2019 Nov 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109698
PMID:31704594
Abstract

The significant role of high-quality data in environmental policymaking has led to the Chinese central government's concrete efforts to improve its monitoring system, which had long been plagued with data manipulation by local governments. The most remarkable policy innovation of the last decade in this area has been the introduction of a critical external oversight-profit-making third-party organizations-by the central government to monitor local governments' environmental performance. Despite the significance of third-party environmental monitoring, little is known about its effectiveness in improving data accuracy and whether and how it brings about changes to China's environmental governance. Framed within the literature on China's intergovernmental relationship and adopting a regression discontinuity model with a national database of air quality, this study examines whether third-party monitoring improves the accuracy of environmental data in China, and if so, how this approach can remedy the problem of data manipulation. Results show that data accuracy has been improved after the involvement of third-party organizations, providing evidence that supports China's efforts to advance its environmental governance from a mono-centric and non-participatory policy process to one that integrates both authoritarian control and market-based mechanisms. We discuss policy implications of this finding for environmental governance in China.

摘要

高质量数据在环境政策制定中的重要作用促使中国中央政府切实努力改善其监测系统,长期以来,地方政府一直存在数据操纵问题。在这一领域,过去十年最显著的政策创新是中央政府引入了具有关键外部监督作用的盈利性第三方组织,以监测地方政府的环境绩效。尽管第三方环境监测意义重大,但人们对其提高数据准确性的有效性知之甚少,也不清楚它是否以及如何改变中国的环境治理。本文借鉴了中国政府间关系的文献,采用带有全国空气质量数据库的回归不连续模型,研究了第三方监测是否能提高中国环境数据的准确性,如果能,这种方法如何能解决数据操纵问题。研究结果表明,第三方组织介入后,数据准确性得到了提高,这为支持中国从单一中心和非参与性政策进程向整合权威控制和基于市场的机制的环境治理迈进提供了证据。我们讨论了这一发现对中国环境治理的政策意义。

相似文献

1
Has third-party monitoring improved environmental data quality? An analysis of air pollution data in China.第三方监测是否提高了环境数据质量?对中国空气污染数据的分析。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Jan 1;253:109698. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109698. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
2
Ranking effect in air pollution governance: Evidence from Chinese cities.空气污染治理中的排名效应:来自中国城市的证据。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Dec 1;251:109600. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109600. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
3
Effectiveness evaluation on third-party governance model for environmental pollution in China.中国环境污染第三方治理模式的有效性评价。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jun;26(17):17305-17320. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05106-0. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
4
Does the "Miracle Drug" of Environmental Governance Really Improve Air Quality? Evidence from China's System of Central Environmental Protection Inspections.环境治理的“灵丹妙药”真能改善空气质量吗?来自中国中央环保督察制度的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 8;16(5):850. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16050850.
5
Campaign-style governance of air pollution in China? A comprehensive analysis of the central environmental protection inspection.中国的大气污染运动式治理?中央环保督察的综合分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 21;11:1081573. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1081573. eCollection 2023.
6
Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Environmental Governance in China: Evidence from the River Chief System (RCS).中国环境治理的上下协同模式:来自河长制的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 27;17(19):7058. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197058.
7
Vertical environmental protection pressure, fiscal pressure, and local environmental regulations: evidence from China's industrial sulfur dioxide treatment.垂直环保压力、财政压力与地方环境规制——来自中国工业二氧化硫治理的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Nov;28(42):60095-60110. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14947-7. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
8
Can intergovernmental cooperative policies promote water ecology improvement-An analysis based on water quality data from China's general environmental monitoring station.政府间合作政策能否促进水生态改善——基于中国环境监测总站水质数据的分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 27;18(11):e0294951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294951. eCollection 2023.
9
Is collaborative governance effective for air pollution prevention? A case study on the Yangtze river delta region of China.协同治理对空气污染防治是否有效?以中国长三角地区为例。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Aug 15;292:112709. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112709. Epub 2021 May 11.
10
Fiscal Decentralization, Green Technology Innovation, and Regional Air Pollution in China: An Investigation from the Perspective of Intergovernmental Competition.财政分权、绿色技术创新与中国区域大气污染:基于府际竞争视角的考察。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 11;19(14):8456. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148456.

引用本文的文献

1
Air pollution and defensive behavior: Evidence from transaction data in China.空气污染与避险行为:来自中国交易数据的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 7;19(11):e0307295. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307295. eCollection 2024.
2
The Interaction Mechanism of Fiscal Pressure, Local Government Behavioral Preferences and Environmental Governance Efficiency: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta Region of China.财政压力、地方政府行为偏好与环境治理效率的互动机制——来自中国长三角地区的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 10;19(24):16618. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416618.
3
The Concept, Practice, Application, and Results of Locally Based Monitoring of the Environment.
基于本地的环境监测的概念、实践、应用及结果
Bioscience. 2021 Apr 28;71(5):484-502. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biab021. eCollection 2021 May.