Department of Social Services and Health Care, Helsinki Hospital, Home-Care Services, PO Box 6540, 00099, Helsinki, Finland.
Department of General Practice, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Drugs Aging. 2020 Jan;37(1):27-34. doi: 10.1007/s40266-019-00720-6.
The use of drugs with anticholinergic properties (DAPs) is common among older adults despite their known adverse effects, such as cognitive decline. Professionals should pay attention to DAPs, since evidence on their adverse effects has been accumulating during the last decade. However, to our knowledge previous studies exploring temporal trends in the use of DAPs are scarce.
The aim of this study was to assess temporal trends in the use of DAPs from 2003 to 2017 in long-term care facilities in Helsinki.
Four cross-sectional studies were conducted in 2003, 2007, 2011, and 2017. Participants included older people (≥ 65 years) living in nursing homes (NHs) in 2003 (n = 1979), 2011 (n = 1568), and 2017 (n = 750), and in assisted living facilities (ALFs) in 2007 (n = 1336), 2011 (n = 1556), and 2017 (n = 1673) in Helsinki, Finland. Data on demographics, medication use, and diagnoses were collected by structured questionnaires. The assessments were conducted as a point prevalence over 1 day. The use of DAPs and the total anticholinergic burden were defined by the Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS).
In ALFs, there has been an increasing trend in the use of DAPs over a 10-year period (41.2% in 2007 and 53.7% in 2017). In NHs, by contrast, the use of DAPs remained quite stable (52.3% in 2003 and 52.4% in 2017). The burden of DAPs measured by ARS score decreased in NHs and remained stable in ALFs. Marked changes occurred in the DAPs used; antidepressants, especially mirtazapine, increased in both settings, whereas the use of hydroxyzine and urinary antispasmodics nearly disappeared. The proportion of users of DAP antipsychotics increased in ALFs. Participants with dementia had a lower anticholinergic burden than those without dementia, in both settings.
Despite increased knowledge of the harms of DAPs, they remain widely used. Physicians seem to be aware of the harms of DAPs among people with dementia, and some other favorable trends in prescribing were also observed. Clinicians should especially consider the indications behind the use of DAP antidepressants and antipsychotics, and carefully weigh their potential benefits and harms.
尽管抗胆碱能药物(DAPs)具有已知的不良影响,如认知能力下降,但在老年人中仍广泛使用。专业人员应注意 DAPs,因为在过去十年中,关于它们的不良影响的证据一直在积累。然而,据我们所知,以前探索 DAP 使用时间趋势的研究很少。
本研究旨在评估 2003 年至 2017 年期间赫尔辛基长期护理机构中 DAP 使用的时间趋势。
在 2003 年、2007 年、2011 年和 2017 年进行了四项横断面研究。参与者包括居住在赫尔辛基养老院(NH)的老年人(≥65 岁),2003 年(n=1979)、2011 年(n=1568)和 2017 年(n=750),以及辅助生活设施(ALFs)中的老年人,2007 年(n=1336)、2011 年(n=1556)和 2017 年(n=1673)。通过结构化问卷收集人口统计学、药物使用和诊断数据。评估是通过一天的点患病率进行的。DAP 的使用和总抗胆碱能负担通过抗胆碱能风险量表(ARS)定义。
在 ALFs 中,DAP 的使用在 10 年内呈上升趋势(2007 年为 41.2%,2017 年为 53.7%)。相比之下,NH 中 DAP 的使用保持相对稳定(2003 年为 52.3%,2017 年为 52.4%)。通过 ARS 评分测量的 DAP 负担在 NH 中减少,在 ALFs 中保持稳定。使用的 DAP 发生了明显变化;抗抑郁药,尤其是米氮平,在两种情况下都有所增加,而羟嗪和尿痉挛剂的使用几乎消失。在 ALFs 中,使用 DAP 抗精神病药物的患者比例增加。在两种情况下,痴呆患者的抗胆碱能负担均低于非痴呆患者。
尽管人们越来越了解 DAP 的危害,但它们仍被广泛使用。医生似乎意识到痴呆患者使用 DAP 的危害,并且在开处方方面也观察到了一些其他有利的趋势。临床医生尤其应考虑 DAP 抗抑郁药和抗精神病药使用背后的适应症,并仔细权衡其潜在的益处和危害。