Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Duke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2020 Apr;59(4):225-239. doi: 10.1002/gcc.22824. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
Circulating tumor cell (CTC) and cell-free (cf) DNA-based genomic alterations are increasingly being used for clinical decision-making in oncology. However, the concordance and discordance between paired CTC and cfDNA genomic profiles remain largely unknown. We performed comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) on CTCs and cfDNA, and low-pass whole genome sequencing (lpWGS) on cfDNA to characterize genomic alterations (CNA) and tumor content in two independent prospective studies of 93 men with mCRPC treated with enzalutamide/abiraterone, or radium-223. Comprehensive analysis of 69 patient CTCs and 72 cfDNA samples from 93 men with mCRPC, including 64 paired samples, identified common concordant gains in FOXA1, AR, and MYC, and losses in BRCA1, PTEN, and RB1 between CTCs and cfDNA. Concordant PTEN loss and discordant BRCA2 gain were associated with significantly worse outcomes in Epic AR-V7 negative men with mCRPC treated with abiraterone/enzalutamide. We identified and externally validated CTC-specific genomic alternations that were discordant in paired cfDNA, even in samples with high tumor content. These CTC/cfDNA-discordant regions included key genomic regulators of lineage plasticity, osteomimicry, and cellular differentiation, including MYCN gain in CTCs (31%) that was rarely detected in cfDNA. CTC MYCN gain was associated with poor clinical outcomes in AR-V7 negative men and small cell transformation. In conclusion, we demonstrated concordance of multiple genomic alterations across CTC and cfDNA platforms; however, some genomic alterations displayed substantial discordance between CTC DNA and cfDNA despite the use of identical copy number analysis methods, suggesting tumor heterogeneity and divergent evolution associated with poor clinical outcomes.
循环肿瘤细胞(CTC)和无细胞(cf)DNA 相关的基因组改变越来越多地被用于肿瘤学的临床决策。然而,配对的 CTC 和 cfDNA 基因组图谱之间的一致性和差异性在很大程度上仍不清楚。我们对 93 例接受恩扎鲁胺/阿比特龙或镭-223 治疗的 mCRPC 男性的 CTC 和 cfDNA 进行了比较基因组杂交(CGH)分析,对 cfDNA 进行了低深度全基因组测序(lpWGS)分析,以描述基因组改变(CNA)和肿瘤含量。对 93 例 mCRPC 男性的 69 例 CTC 和 72 例 cfDNA 样本进行了两项独立的前瞻性研究,包括 64 对样本,发现 FOXA1、AR 和 MYC 的共同一致增益,以及 CTC 和 cfDNA 之间的 BRCA1、PTEN 和 RB1 的共同一致缺失。在接受阿比特龙/恩扎鲁胺治疗的 Epic AR-V7 阴性 mCRPC 男性中,PTEN 缺失一致且 BRCA2 增益不一致与预后显著较差相关。我们鉴定并外部验证了 CTC 特异性基因组改变,即使在肿瘤含量高的样本中,这些改变在配对 cfDNA 中也是不一致的。这些 CTC/cfDNA 不一致的区域包括谱系可塑性、骨模拟和细胞分化的关键基因组调节因子,包括 CTC 中的 MYCN 增益(31%),在 cfDNA 中很少检测到。CTCMYCN 增益与 AR-V7 阴性男性和小细胞转化的不良临床结局相关。总之,我们证明了 CTC 和 cfDNA 平台上多个基因组改变的一致性;然而,一些基因组改变尽管使用了相同的拷贝数分析方法,但在 CTC DNA 和 cfDNA 之间表现出明显的不一致,这表明肿瘤异质性和与不良临床结局相关的不同进化。