Addiction Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Addiction Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States; Injury Prevention Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, United States.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Dec 1;205:107699. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107699. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
Rural-urban differences in cigarette and cannabis use have traditionally shown higher levels of cigarette smoking in rural areas and of cannabis use in urban areas. To assess for changes in this pattern of use, we examined trends and prevalence of cigarette, cannabis, and co-use across urban-rural localities.
Urban-rural trends in current cigarette and/or cannabis use was evaluated using 11 cohorts (2007-2017) of the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH; N = 397,542). We used logistic regressions to model cigarette and cannabis use over time, adjusting for demographics (age, gender, race/ethnicity, income, education), in addition to assessing patterns of cannabis use among cigarette smokers and nonsmokers.
Despite decreases in cigarette smoking overall, between 2007 and 2017, the urban-rural disparity in cigarette smoking increased (AOR = 1.17), with less reduction in rural as compared to urban cigarette smokers. Cannabis use increased in general (AOR = 1.88 by 2017), with greater odds in urban than rural regions. Cannabis use increased more rapidly in non-cigarette smokers than smokers (AOR = 1.37 by 2017), with 219% greater odds of cannabis use in rural non-cigarette smokers in 2017 versus 2007.
Rurality remains an important risk factor for cigarette smoking in adults and the fastest-growing group of cannabis users is rural non-cigarette smokers; however, cannabis use is currently still more prevalent in urban areas. Improved reach and access to empirically-supported prevention and treatment, especially in rural areas, along with dissemination and enforcement of policy-level regulations, may mitigate disparities in cigarette use and slow the increase in rural cannabis use.
农村和城市地区在香烟和大麻使用方面存在差异,传统上农村地区的吸烟率较高,而城市地区的大麻使用率较高。为了评估这种使用模式的变化,我们考察了城乡地区香烟、大麻和共用品使用的趋势和流行率。
使用国家毒品使用与健康调查(NSDUH;N=397542)的 11 个队列(2007-2017 年)评估当前香烟和/或大麻使用的城乡趋势。我们使用逻辑回归模型来模拟随时间推移的香烟和大麻使用情况,调整了人口统计学因素(年龄、性别、种族/族裔、收入、教育),并评估了吸烟者和非吸烟者中大麻使用的模式。
尽管总体吸烟率下降,但在 2007 年至 2017 年期间,城乡吸烟率差距有所增加(AOR=1.17),农村吸烟者的降幅低于城市吸烟者。大麻使用率普遍上升(2017 年为 AOR=1.88),城市地区的大麻使用率高于农村地区。与吸烟者相比,非吸烟者中大麻使用的增长速度更快(2017 年为 AOR=1.37),2017 年农村非吸烟者中大麻使用的几率比 2007 年增加了 219%。
农村地区仍然是成年人吸烟的重要风险因素,农村非吸烟者是大麻使用增长最快的群体;然而,目前大麻在城市地区的使用率仍然更高。改善针对农村地区的实证支持预防和治疗的覆盖范围和可及性,以及传播和执行政策层面的法规,可能会减轻吸烟方面的差异,并减缓农村大麻使用的增加。