Martins Silvia S, Mauro Christine M, Santaella-Tenorio Julian, Kim June H, Cerda Magdalena, Keyes Katherine M, Hasin Deborah S, Galea Sandro, Wall Melanie
Columbia University, New York, United States.
Columbia University, New York, United States.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Dec 1;169:26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
Little is known on how perceived availability of marijuana is associated with medical marijuana laws. We examined the relationship between medical marijuana laws (MML) and the prevalence of past-month marijuana use, with perceived availability of marijuana.
Data were from respondents included in the National Survey of Drug Use and Health restricted use data portal 2004-2013. Multilevel logistic regression of individual-level data was used to test differences between MML and non-MML states and changes in prevalence of past-month marijuana use and perceived availability from before to after passage of MML among adolescents, young adults and older adults controlling for demographics.
Among adults 26+, past-month prevalence of marijuana use increased from 5.87% to 7.15% after MML passage (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR): 1.24 [1.16-1.31]), but no change in prevalence of use was found for 12-17 or 18-25 year-olds. Perceived availability of marijuana increased after MML was enacted among those 26+ but not in younger groups. Among all age groups, prevalence of marijuana use and perception of it being easily available was higher in states that would eventually pass MML by 2013 compared to those that had not. Perceived availability was significantly associated with increased risk of past-month marijuana use in all age groups.
Evidence suggests perceived availability as a driver of change in use of marijuana due to MML. To date, this has only occurred in adults 26+ and different scenarios that could explain this change need to be further explored.
关于大麻的可获得性认知与医用大麻法律之间的关联,我们所知甚少。我们研究了医用大麻法律(MML)与过去一个月大麻使用流行率以及大麻可获得性认知之间的关系。
数据来自2004 - 2013年全国药物使用和健康调查受限使用数据门户的受访者。使用个体层面数据的多水平逻辑回归来检验MML州和非MML州之间的差异,以及在控制人口统计学因素的情况下,青少年、年轻人和老年人在MML通过前后过去一个月大麻使用流行率和可获得性认知的变化。
在26岁及以上成年人中,MML通过后过去一个月大麻使用流行率从5.87%增至7.15%(调整优势比(AOR):1.24 [1.16 - 1.31]),但12 - 17岁或18 - 25岁人群的使用流行率未发现变化。在26岁及以上人群中,MML颁布后大麻可获得性认知增加,但年轻人群体中未增加。在所有年龄组中,与2013年最终未通过MML的州相比,最终通过MML的州中大麻使用流行率及其易于获得的认知更高。在所有年龄组中,可获得性认知与过去一个月大麻使用风险增加显著相关。
有证据表明可获得性认知是MML导致大麻使用变化的驱动因素。迄今为止,这种情况仅发生在26岁及以上成年人中,需要进一步探索可以解释这种变化的不同情形。