Suppr超能文献

夜间磨牙症不同治疗方法的比较。

A comparison of different treatments for nocturnal bruxism.

作者信息

Pierce C J, Gale E N

机构信息

Department of Behavioral Science, University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine, Pennsylvania 15261.

出版信息

J Dent Res. 1988 Mar;67(3):597-601. doi: 10.1177/00220345880670031501.

Abstract

One hundred bruxers were evaluated for bruxing activity before, during, and after treatment with a portable electromyograph (EMG). A six-month post-treatment follow-up of bruxing activity was obtained. Experimental treatment groups consisted of diurnal biofeedback, nocturnal biofeedback, massed negative practice, and splint therapy. A no-treatment control group was included. The comparative efficacy of treatments was determined by analyses of variance. Both EMG-measured frequency of bruxing episodes and duration of bruxing activity decreased significantly for nocturnal biofeedback and splint therapy treatments but not for massed negative practice, diurnal biofeedback (relaxation), or the no-treatment control group. The two-week treatment effects were transient, and bruxing activity generally returned to baseline levels when treatment was withdrawn. These findings are consistent with the findings of previous researchers with regard to nocturnal biofeedback and splint therapy but differ from previous findings for massed negative practice therapy.

摘要

使用便携式肌电图仪(EMG)对100名磨牙症患者在治疗前、治疗期间和治疗后进行磨牙活动评估。对磨牙活动进行了为期六个月的治疗后随访。实验治疗组包括日间生物反馈、夜间生物反馈、集中消极练习和夹板治疗。设立了一个不治疗的对照组。通过方差分析确定治疗的比较疗效。对于夜间生物反馈和夹板治疗,EMG测量的磨牙发作频率和磨牙活动持续时间均显著降低,但对于集中消极练习、日间生物反馈(放松)或不治疗的对照组则没有降低。两周的治疗效果是短暂的,停止治疗后磨牙活动通常会恢复到基线水平。这些发现与先前研究人员关于夜间生物反馈和夹板治疗的发现一致,但与先前关于集中消极练习治疗的发现不同。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验