• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠癌急诊与择期手术的肿瘤学长期结局。

Oncologic long-term outcomes of emergency versus elective resection for colorectal cancer.

机构信息

Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Dec;34(12):2091-2099. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03426-8. Epub 2019 Nov 11.

DOI:10.1007/s00384-019-03426-8
PMID:31709491
Abstract

PURPOSE

Long-term outcomes in patients undergoing emergency versus elective resection for colorectal cancer (CRC) are discussed controversially. This study aims to assess long-term outcomes of emergency versus elective CRC surgery.

METHODS

Single-center retrospective cohort study. Patients undergoing emergency or elective CRC surgery from July 2002 to January 2013 were included. Primary outcome was 5-year survival, secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and local tumor recurrence.

RESULTS

Overall, 475 patients were included. Median age was 69.0 (IQR 59.0-77.0) years. A total of 141 patients (30%) were operated for rectal cancer and 334 patients (70%) for colon cancer. Median follow-up was 445 (IQR 67-1409) days. Emergency resection was performed in 105 patients (22%) due to obstruction, perforation, or bleeding. Stage IV tumors and ASA scores≥ 3 were significantly more frequent in the emergency than in the elective resection group (39.0% vs. 33.5%, p < 0.001; 75.5% vs. 61.3%, p = 0.003). The rate of patients with positive lymph nodes was similar in the two groups (46.2% vs. 46.3%, p = 1.000). In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the emergency CRC versus the elective CRC group (8.4% vs. 3.0%, p = 0.023). Five-year survival (aHR 1.38; 95%CI 0.81-2.37, p = 0.237) or local tumor recurrence (aHR 1.48; 95%CI 0.47-4.66, p = 0.500) were not significantly different in patients undergoing emergency versus elective surgery for CRC.

CONCLUSION

In-hospital mortality was increased in emergency versus elective CRC resections. However, 5-year survival and local recurrence after surgery for CRC were determined by the tumor stage, and not by the emergency versus elective setting of surgical resection.

摘要

目的

对于接受紧急或择期结直肠癌(CRC)切除术的患者,其长期预后存在争议。本研究旨在评估紧急与择期 CRC 手术的长期预后。

方法

单中心回顾性队列研究。纳入 2002 年 7 月至 2013 年 1 月期间接受紧急或择期 CRC 手术的患者。主要结局为 5 年生存率,次要结局为住院死亡率和局部肿瘤复发。

结果

共纳入 475 例患者。中位年龄为 69.0(IQR 59.0-77.0)岁。其中 141 例(30%)为直肠肿瘤患者,334 例(70%)为结肠肿瘤患者。中位随访时间为 445(IQR 67-1409)天。105 例(22%)患者因梗阻、穿孔或出血而接受紧急手术。与择期手术组相比,紧急手术组中 IV 期肿瘤和 ASA 评分≥3 的患者明显更多(39.0%比 33.5%,p<0.001;75.5%比 61.3%,p=0.003)。两组患者阳性淋巴结的比例相似(46.2%比 46.3%,p=1.000)。紧急 CRC 手术的住院死亡率明显高于择期 CRC 手术组(8.4%比 3.0%,p=0.023)。5 年生存率(aHR 1.38;95%CI 0.81-2.37,p=0.237)或局部肿瘤复发(aHR 1.48;95%CI 0.47-4.66,p=0.500)在接受紧急与择期 CRC 手术的患者中无显著差异。

结论

与择期 CRC 切除术相比,紧急 CRC 切除术的住院死亡率增加。然而,CRC 手术后的 5 年生存率和局部复发率取决于肿瘤分期,而不是手术切除的紧急与择期情况。

相似文献

1
Oncologic long-term outcomes of emergency versus elective resection for colorectal cancer.结直肠癌急诊与择期手术的肿瘤学长期结局。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Dec;34(12):2091-2099. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03426-8. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
2
Emergency Resection for Colonic Cancer Has an Independent and Unfavorable Effect on Long-Term Oncologic Outcome.结肠癌急诊切除术对长期肿瘤学结果有独立和不利的影响。
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2024 Sep;55(3):1401-1409. doi: 10.1007/s12029-024-01074-y. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
3
Impact of a Dual-Ring Wound Protector on Outcome After Elective Surgery for Colorectal Cancer.双环型伤口保护器对择期结直肠癌手术后结局的影响。
J Surg Res. 2019 Dec;244:136-145. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.014. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
4
Aspects of survival from colorectal cancer in Denmark.丹麦结直肠癌的生存情况
Dan Med J. 2012 Apr;59(4):B4428.
5
Should we still doubt the success of emergency oncologic colorectal surgery?: A retrospective study.我们还应怀疑急诊肿瘤性结直肠手术的成功率吗?一项回顾性研究。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2020 Jan;26(1):55-62. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2019.04043.
6
Emergency resection is an independent risk factor for decreased long-term overall survival in colorectal cancer: a matched-pair analysis.紧急切除术是结直肠癌患者长期总体生存率降低的独立危险因素:一项配对分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Sep 28;21(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03182-8.
7
Major postoperative complications following elective resection for colorectal cancer decrease long-term survival but not the time to recurrence.结直肠癌择期切除术后的主要并发症会降低长期生存率,但不会影响复发时间。
Colorectal Dis. 2015 Feb;17(2):141-9. doi: 10.1111/codi.12757.
8
Who requires emergency surgery for colorectal cancer and can national screening programmes reduce this need?哪些结直肠癌患者需要紧急手术,国家筛查计划能否减少这种需求?
Int J Surg. 2017 Jun;42:60-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.04.050. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
9
Long-term outcomes and prognostic factors of patients with obstructive colorectal cancer: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.梗阻性结直肠癌患者的长期结局及预后因素:一项多中心回顾性队列研究
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jun 14;22(22):5237-45. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i22.5237.
10
Influence of Anastomotic Leak After Elective Colorectal Cancer Resection on Survival and Local Recurrence: A Propensity Score Analysis.择期结直肠癌切除术后吻合口漏对生存和局部复发的影响:倾向评分分析。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Mar;62(3):286-293. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001287.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Oncologic Surgical Emergencies: A Retrospective Study.肿瘤外科急症的临床特征与结局:一项回顾性研究
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug 21. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-18031-z.
2
The Clinical Outcomes of Preoperative Self-Expandable Metal Stent Placement as Bridge to Surgery for Obstructive Colorectal Cancer.术前自膨式金属支架置入作为梗阻性结直肠癌手术桥梁的临床结局
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2025 Jun;8(6):e70255. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.70255.
3
Surgical outcomes of curative intent management in emergency vs. elective colon cancer: A retrospective single center study.

本文引用的文献

1
Short-term outcome of emergency colorectal cancer surgery: results from Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit.急诊结直肠癌手术的短期结局:双边结直肠癌审计结果
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Jan;34(1):63-69. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3169-5. Epub 2018 Sep 30.
2
Long-term oncological outcomes following emergency resection of colon cancer.结肠癌急诊切除术后的长期肿瘤学结局
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Nov;33(11):1525-1532. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3109-4. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
3
Prehabilitation and functional recovery for colorectal cancer patients.
急诊与择期结肠癌根治性治疗的手术结果:一项回顾性单中心研究。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2025 Jul 1;31(4):233-240. doi: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_101_25. Epub 2025 Jun 6.
4
Large Bowel Obstruction: Etiologies, Diagnosis, and Management.大肠梗阻:病因、诊断与治疗
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2023 Dec 29;37(6):376-380. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1777452. eCollection 2024 Nov.
5
Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Clinical and Pathologic Characteristics of Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Multicenter Study in South Korea.新冠疫情对结直肠癌临床和病理特征的影响:韩国一项回顾性多中心研究
Cancer Manag Res. 2024 Sep 4;16:1131-1139. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S478056. eCollection 2024.
6
Emergency Resection for Colonic Cancer Has an Independent and Unfavorable Effect on Long-Term Oncologic Outcome.结肠癌急诊切除术对长期肿瘤学结果有独立和不利的影响。
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2024 Sep;55(3):1401-1409. doi: 10.1007/s12029-024-01074-y. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
7
Management of obstructed colorectal carcinoma in an emergency setting: An update.急诊情况下梗阻性结直肠癌的管理:最新进展
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024 Mar 15;16(3):598-613. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i3.598.
8
Assessing Changes in Colon Cancer Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Four-Year Analysis at a Romanian University Hospital.评估新冠疫情期间结肠癌护理的变化:罗马尼亚一家大学医院的四年分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 16;12(20):6558. doi: 10.3390/jcm12206558.
9
Clinical outcomes of obstructive colorectal cancer patients during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.新型冠状病毒病 2019 大流行期间梗阻性结直肠癌患者的临床结局。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2023 Jun;29(6):663-668. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2023.44524.
10
Colorectal neoplastic emergencies in immunocompromised patients: preliminary result from the Web-based International Register of Emergency Surgery and Trauma (WIRES-T trial).免疫功能低下患者的结直肠肿瘤急症:基于网络的国际急诊外科学和创伤登记研究(WIRES-T 试验)的初步结果。
Updates Surg. 2023 Sep;75(6):1579-1587. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01521-8. Epub 2023 May 9.
结直肠癌患者的预康复和功能恢复。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jul;44(7):919-926. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.04.016. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
4
Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.直肠癌:欧洲肿瘤内科学会临床实践指南之诊断、治疗及随访
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;28(suppl_4):iv22-iv40. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx224.
5
Colorectal cancer-global burden, trends, and geographical variations.结直肠癌——全球负担、趋势及地理差异
J Surg Oncol. 2017 Apr;115(5):619-630. doi: 10.1002/jso.24578. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
6
Emergent Colectomy Is Independently Associated with Decreased Long-Term Overall Survival in Colon Cancer Patients.急诊结肠切除术与结肠癌患者长期总生存率降低独立相关。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Mar;21(3):543-553. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3355-8. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
7
Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-years for 32 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2015: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.全球、区域和国家癌症发病率、死亡率、生命损失年数、失能生存年数以及 32 种癌症组别的伤残调整生命年数,1990 年至 2015 年:全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Apr 1;3(4):524-548. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688.
8
Urgent surgery after emergency presentation for colorectal cancer has no impact on overall and disease-free survival: a propensity score analysis.结直肠癌急诊就诊后行急诊手术对总生存率和无病生存率无影响:一项倾向评分分析。
BMC Cancer. 2016 Mar 11;16:208. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2239-8.
9
Colorectal specialization and survival in colorectal cancer.结直肠癌中的结直肠特异性与生存情况
Colorectal Dis. 2016 Feb;18(2):O51-60. doi: 10.1111/codi.13246.
10
Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 randomized phase III trial after a median follow-up of 11 years.局部进展期直肠癌术前与术后放化疗的比较:中位随访 11 年后德国 CAO/ARO/AIO-94 随机 III 期临床试验结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 1;30(16):1926-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.1836. Epub 2012 Apr 23.