Booth D C, Wisenbaugh T, Smith M, DeMaria A N
Division of Cardiology, Albert B. Chandler Medical Center, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington 40536.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 Nov;12(5):1231-6. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(88)92605-8.
Diminished left ventricular distensibility has been postulated as a cause of left ventricular failure in atrial septal defect. To evaluate this hypothesis the indexes of left ventricular compliance and stiffness were estimated in 15 patients with atrial septal defect and the results compared with those in 10 normal subjects. Age, peak left ventricular systolic pressure, end-diastolic pressure, ejection fraction and cardiac index did not differ significantly between groups. Left ventricular end-diastolic volume for the atrial septal defect group was significantly less than that for the control group (mean +/- SD, 61 +/- 9 ml/m2 versus 73 +/- 13, p less than 0.05) in keeping with previous studies. The slope of the log pressure-volume relation was significantly greater in the group with atrial septal defect than in the normal group (0.056 +/- 0.010 versus 0.044 +/- 0.008, p less than 0.01), consistent with increased chamber stiffness. For a group of six patients with atrial septal defect and elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, normalized compliance was significantly less than that in the control group (0.017 +/- 0.001 versus 0.036 +/- 0.007, p less than 0.02). The slope k of the elastic stiffness-stress relation for the total group with atrial septal defect was significantly greater than that of the normal group (21.0 +/- 2.3 versus 18.1 +/- 2.3, p less than 0.01). An index of muscle fiber stretch (dV/VdP x end-diastolic stress x 100) was significantly less in the atrial septal defect group than in the control group (74 +/- 24 versus 106 +/- 22, p less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
左心室扩张性降低被认为是房间隔缺损导致左心衰竭的一个原因。为评估这一假说,对15例房间隔缺损患者的左心室顺应性和僵硬度指标进行了评估,并将结果与10名正常受试者的结果进行比较。两组之间的年龄、左心室收缩压峰值、舒张末期压力、射血分数和心脏指数无显著差异。与先前研究一致,房间隔缺损组的左心室舒张末期容积显著低于对照组(均值±标准差,61±9ml/m² 对比 73±13,p<0.05)。房间隔缺损组的对数压力-容积关系斜率显著大于正常组(0.056±0.010对比0.044±0.008,p<0.01),这与心室僵硬度增加一致。对于6例房间隔缺损且左心室舒张末期压力升高的患者,其标准化顺应性显著低于对照组(0.017±0.001对比0.036±0.007,p<0.02)。房间隔缺损组总的弹性僵硬度-应力关系斜率k显著大于正常组(21.0±2.3对比18.1±2.3,p<0.01)。房间隔缺损组的肌纤维拉伸指数(dV/VdP×舒张末期应力×100)显著低于对照组(74±24对比106±22,p<0.01)。(摘要截选至250字)