Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Department of Pathology, Lakeridge Hospital, University of Toronto, Oshawa, ON, Canada.
J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2020 Jan-Feb;9(1):38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jasc.2019.09.002. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
Many pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL) are of neoplastic nature with potential to progress to pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Early stratification of patients to either clinical observation or surgical intervention can considerably increase the survival rate. Recent studies have shown the value of molecular analysis to current diagnostic modalities.The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic improvement by utilizing multiple sequential cytologic and molecular cyst fluid analyses.
We prospectively evaluated 58 patients for whom multiple endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of cyst fluid specimens were available. Specimens were subjected to next generation sequencing to identify any recurrent gene mutations commonly found in PCL. The molecular findings were compared with cytologic and final diagnoses.
Cytologic diagnoses were classified into 3 groups: non-diagnostic (first visit: 33.9%, cumulative: 15.8%, P = 0.03), negative (1st visit: 53.6%, cumulative: 56.1%, P = 0.85) and atypical/suspicious/positive (first visit: 12.5%, cumulative: 28.1%, P = 0.06). The mutational analyses were clustered into indeterminate/failure (first visit: 1.7%, cumulative: 0%), KRAS/GNAS/VHL group (first visit: 50.0%, cumulative: 53.4%) and any mutation (first visit: 50.0%, cumulative: 53.4%). Mutational analysis identifies up to 72% and 71% whereas cytologic analysis classified up to 46% and 63% of lesions correctly in first and multiple visits, respectively.
The cytology and molecular analyses provide a complementary approach to patients with PCL. Power of molecular analysis in detection of a neoplastic lesion is significantly higher in one visit (P = 0.01) with comparable detection rates (P = 0.43) for both cytologic and molecular analyses after multiple visits.
许多胰腺囊性病变(PCL)具有肿瘤性质,有可能进展为胰腺腺癌。对患者进行早期分层,要么进行临床观察,要么进行手术干预,可以显著提高生存率。最近的研究表明,分子分析对当前的诊断方式具有重要价值。本研究旨在评估通过多次连续细胞学和分子囊液分析来提高诊断水平。
我们前瞻性评估了 58 名患者,他们均接受了多次内镜超声引导下细针抽吸囊液标本。对标本进行下一代测序,以鉴定 PCL 中常见的复发性基因突变。将分子结果与细胞学和最终诊断进行比较。
细胞学诊断分为 3 组:非诊断性(初次就诊:33.9%,累计:15.8%,P = 0.03)、阴性(初次就诊:53.6%,累计:56.1%,P = 0.85)和非典型/可疑/阳性(初次就诊:12.5%,累计:28.1%,P = 0.06)。突变分析分为不确定/失败(初次就诊:1.7%,累计:0%)、KRAS/GNAS/VHL 组(初次就诊:50.0%,累计:53.4%)和任何突变(初次就诊:50.0%,累计:53.4%)。突变分析在初次和多次就诊时分别正确分类了高达 72%和 71%的病变,而细胞学分析分别正确分类了高达 46%和 63%的病变。
细胞学和分子分析为 PCL 患者提供了一种互补的方法。在一次就诊时,分子分析在检测肿瘤性病变方面的效能明显更高(P = 0.01),而在多次就诊时,细胞学和分子分析的检测率相当(P = 0.43)。