Suppr超能文献

阑尾肿块与脓肿治疗方法的比较:一项前瞻性队列研究。

Comparison of treatment methods of appendiceal mass and abscess: A prospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Demetrashvili Zaza, Kenchadze George, Pipia Irakli, Khutsishvili Kakhi, Loladze David, Ekaladze Eka, Merabishvili Giorgi, Kamkamidze George

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Tbilisi State Medical University, 33 Vazha-Pshavelaave, 0177, Tbilisi, Georgia.

Department of Surgery, Kipshidze Central University Hospital, 29 Vazha-Pshavelaave, 0160, Tbilisi, Georgia.

出版信息

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2019 Oct 24;48:48-52. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2019.10.016. eCollection 2019 Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of our prospective study is to compare and analyze the results of two treatment methods of appendiceal mass and abscess: emergency surgery and conservative treatment with and without interval surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

74 Patients with the diagnosis of appendiceal mass or abscess were enrolled in this study. The patients were assigned into two groups: the emergency surgery group and the conservative management group. The conservative management group was subdivided into two groups: interval surgery group and the ambulatory follow-up observation group without interval surgery. Several clinical characteristics were determined and compared between the groups. Among patients who underwent surgery, the surgical methods, operation time, postoperative hospitalization period, and post-surgical complications were analyzed. In the ambulatory follow-up observation group, recurrence of appendicitis was assessed.

RESULTS

Comparison of the emergency surgery group and interval surgery group revealed that the interval surgery group was characterized by shorter operation time (P = 0.008), a smallernumber of postoperative complications (P = 0.02) and also shorter postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.009). In the ambulatory follow-up observation group, recurrence of appendicitis developed in 3 (13%) patients. US or CT-guided PCD was performed in all 3 patients on the conservative treatment stage. Comparing the interval surgery and recurrent appendicitis groups revealed statistically significant difference: operation time (P = 0.04) as well as postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.04) were shorter in recurrent appendicitis group. In 3 (4.1%) patients, the cause of the appendiceal mass was caecal cancer (2 cases) and Crohn's disease.

CONCLUSION

Conservative treatment without interval surgery seems to be the preferred method for treatment of appendiceal mass and abscess. Patients can be operated on only in case of recurrence of appendicitis. US or CT PCD of appendiceal abscess presents the risk-factor for the development of recurrence of appendicitis. CT and colonoscopy within 4-6 weeks after completing the conservative treatment is recommended to be performed in all patients.

摘要

背景

我们前瞻性研究的目的是比较和分析阑尾包块及脓肿的两种治疗方法的结果:急诊手术以及有无二期手术的保守治疗。

材料与方法

本研究纳入74例诊断为阑尾包块或脓肿的患者。患者被分为两组:急诊手术组和保守治疗组。保守治疗组又分为两组:二期手术组和无二期手术的门诊随访观察组。确定并比较两组之间的几个临床特征。对接受手术的患者,分析手术方法、手术时间、术后住院时间及术后并发症。在门诊随访观察组,评估阑尾炎的复发情况。

结果

急诊手术组与二期手术组比较显示,二期手术组具有手术时间较短(P = 0.008)、术后并发症数量较少(P = 0.02)以及术后住院时间较短(P = 0.009)的特点。在门诊随访观察组,3例(13%)患者发生阑尾炎复发。所有3例患者在保守治疗阶段均接受了超声或CT引导下的经皮导管引流(PCD)。比较二期手术组和复发性阑尾炎组发现,手术时间(P = 0.04)以及术后住院时间(P = 0.04)在复发性阑尾炎组较短。3例(4.1%)患者阑尾包块的病因是盲肠癌(2例)和克罗恩病。

结论

无二期手术的保守治疗似乎是阑尾包块及脓肿的首选治疗方法。仅在阑尾炎复发时患者才需接受手术。阑尾脓肿的超声或CT引导下PCD是阑尾炎复发的危险因素。建议所有患者在完成保守治疗后4 - 6周内进行CT和结肠镜检查。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验