• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体处于精神病临床高风险时,情绪处理及其神经基质与不良结果的关联。

Association of Adverse Outcomes With Emotion Processing and Its Neural Substrate in Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.

机构信息

Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 1;77(2):190-200. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.3501.

DOI:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.3501
PMID:31722018
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6865249/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The development of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with psychosis has been associated with behavioral and neuroanatomical deficits related to emotion processing. However, the association between alterations in brain regions subserving emotion processing and clinical outcomes remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between alterations in emotion processing and regional gray matter volumes in individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis, and the association with subsequent clinical outcomes.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This naturalistic case-control study with clinical follow-up at 12 months was conducted from July 1, 2010, to August 31, 2016, and collected data from 9 psychosis early detection centers (Amsterdam, Basel, Cologne, Copenhagen, London, Melbourne, Paris, The Hague, and Vienna). Participants (213 individuals at CHR and 52 healthy controls) were enrolled in the European Network of National Schizophrenia Networks Studying Gene-Environment Interactions (EU-GEI) project. Data were analyzed from October 1, 2018, to April 24, 2019.

MAIN MEASURES AND OUTCOMES

Emotion recognition was assessed with the Degraded Facial Affect Recognition Task. Three-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging scans were acquired from all participants, and gray matter volume was measured in regions of interest (medial prefrontal cortex, amygdala, hippocampus, and insula). Clinical outcomes at 12 months were evaluated for transition to psychosis using the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States criteria, and the level of overall functioning was measured through the Global Assessment of Functioning [GAF] scale.

RESULTS

A total of 213 individuals at CHR (105 women [49.3%]; mean [SD] age, 22.9 [4.7] years) and 52 healthy controls (25 women [48.1%]; mean [SD] age, 23.3 [4.0] years) were included in the study at baseline. At the follow-up within 2 years of baseline, 44 individuals at CHR (20.7%) had developed psychosis and 169 (79.3%) had not. Of the individuals at CHR reinterviewed with the GAF, 39 (30.0%) showed good overall functioning (GAF score, ≥65), whereas 91 (70.0%) had poor overall functioning (GAF score, <65). Within the CHR sample, better anger recognition at baseline was associated with worse functional outcome (odds ratio [OR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78-0.99; P = .03). In individuals at CHR with a good functional outcome, positive associations were found between anger recognition and hippocampal volume (ze = 3.91; familywise error [FWE] P = .02) and between fear recognition and medial prefrontal cortex volume (z = 3.60; FWE P = .02), compared with participants with a poor outcome. The onset of psychosis was not associated with baseline emotion recognition performance (neutral OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.79-1.09; P = .37; happy OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.84-1.25; P = .81; fear OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.85-1.13; P = .77; anger OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.89-1.12; P = .96). No difference was observed in the association between performance and regional gray matter volumes in individuals at CHR who developed or did not develop psychosis (FWE P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, poor functional outcome in individuals at CHR was found to be associated with baseline abnormalities in recognizing negative emotion. This finding has potential implications for the stratification of individuals at CHR and suggests that interventions that target socioemotional processing may improve functional outcomes.

摘要

重要性

精神病患者的不良临床结局与情绪处理相关的行为和神经解剖学缺陷有关。然而,与情绪处理相关的脑区变化和临床结局之间的关联仍不清楚。

目的

研究精神分裂症高危个体(CHR)中情绪处理变化与脑区灰质体积的关系,以及与随后的临床结局的关系。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项自然对照研究,有临床随访 12 个月,于 2010 年 7 月 1 日至 2016 年 8 月 31 日进行,收集了来自 9 个精神病早期检测中心(阿姆斯特丹、巴塞尔、科隆、哥本哈根、伦敦、墨尔本、巴黎、海牙和维也纳)的数据。参与者(213 名 CHR 和 52 名健康对照组)被纳入欧洲精神分裂症网络研究基因-环境相互作用(EU-GEI)项目。数据于 2018 年 10 月 1 日至 2019 年 4 月 24 日进行分析。

主要测量和结果

采用面部表情识别任务评估情绪识别。所有参与者均进行了 3T 磁共振成像扫描,在感兴趣的区域(内侧前额叶皮质、杏仁核、海马体和脑岛)测量灰质体积。使用风险精神状态综合评估标准评估 12 个月时的临床转归,使用总体功能评估(GAF)量表评估总体功能水平。

结果

共纳入 213 名 CHR(105 名女性[49.3%];平均[SD]年龄 22.9[4.7]岁)和 52 名健康对照组(25 名女性[48.1%];平均[SD]年龄 23.3[4.0]岁)作为研究的基线。在基线后 2 年内的随访中,44 名 CHR(20.7%)发展为精神病,169 名(79.3%)未发展为精神病。在重新进行 GAF 评估的 CHR 中,39 名(30.0%)的总体功能良好(GAF 评分,≥65),91 名(70.0%)的总体功能较差(GAF 评分,<65)。在 CHR 样本中,基线时愤怒识别能力较好与较差的功能结果相关(优势比[OR],0.88;95%置信区间[CI],0.78-0.99;P=0.03)。在功能结果良好的 CHR 中,愤怒识别与海马体体积之间存在正相关(z=3.91;家族错误率[FWE]P=0.02),恐惧识别与内侧前额叶皮质体积之间存在正相关(z=3.60;FWE P=0.02),与功能结果较差的参与者相比。精神病的发病与基线时的情绪识别表现无关(中性 OR,0.93;95%CI,0.79-1.09;P=0.37;开心 OR,1.03;95%CI,0.84-1.25;P=0.81;恐惧 OR,0.98;95%CI,0.85-1.13;P=0.77;愤怒 OR,1.00;95%CI,0.89-1.12;P=0.96)。在发展或未发展为精神病的 CHR 中,表现与脑区灰质体积之间的关联无差异(FWE P<0.05)。

结论和相关性

本研究发现,CHR 个体的功能结果较差与识别负性情绪的基线异常有关。这一发现对 CHR 个体的分层具有潜在意义,并表明针对社会情感处理的干预措施可能改善功能结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e3/6865249/38c28971b954/jamapsychiatry-77-190-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e3/6865249/fd98b5bd8221/jamapsychiatry-77-190-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e3/6865249/4a3b2c5a9cb2/jamapsychiatry-77-190-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e3/6865249/38c28971b954/jamapsychiatry-77-190-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e3/6865249/fd98b5bd8221/jamapsychiatry-77-190-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e3/6865249/4a3b2c5a9cb2/jamapsychiatry-77-190-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e3/6865249/38c28971b954/jamapsychiatry-77-190-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Association of Adverse Outcomes With Emotion Processing and Its Neural Substrate in Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.个体处于精神病临床高风险时,情绪处理及其神经基质与不良结果的关联。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 1;77(2):190-200. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.3501.
2
Prediction Models of Functional Outcomes for Individuals in the Clinical High-Risk State for Psychosis or With Recent-Onset Depression: A Multimodal, Multisite Machine Learning Analysis.精神分裂症临床高危状态或近期首发抑郁个体的功能结局预测模型:多模态、多中心机器学习分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Nov 1;75(11):1156-1172. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.2165.
3
Association of Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measures With Psychosis Onset in Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Developing Psychosis: An ENIGMA Working Group Mega-analysis.结构磁共振成像指标与处于精神病发病高风险的个体出现精神病的关联性:一项 ENIGMA 工作组的荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 1;78(7):753-766. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0638.
4
Functional mapping of dynamic happy and fearful facial expressions in young adults with familial risk for psychosis - Oulu Brain and Mind Study.有精神病家族风险的年轻人动态快乐和恐惧面部表情的功能映射——奥卢脑与心智研究
Schizophr Res. 2015 May;164(1-3):242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.01.039. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
5
Functional neuroimaging abnormalities in youth with psychosis spectrum symptoms.有精神病性症状谱系的青少年的功能性神经影像学异常。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 May;72(5):456-65. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.3169.
6
Association of Hippocampal Glutamate Levels With Adverse Outcomes in Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.海马谷氨酸水平与精神病临床高危个体不良结局的关联。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Feb 1;76(2):199-207. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3252.
7
Altered age-related trajectories of amygdala-prefrontal circuitry in adolescents at clinical high risk for psychosis: a preliminary study.青少年精神病临床高危人群杏仁核-前额叶回路与年龄相关的轨迹改变:一项初步研究。
Schizophr Res. 2012 Jan;134(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.10.005. Epub 2011 Nov 6.
8
Excessive interstitial free-water in cortical gray matter preceding accelerated volume changes in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis.皮质灰质中过多的细胞外游离水先于临床精神病高危个体的体积加速变化。
Mol Psychiatry. 2024 Nov;29(11):3623-3634. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02597-3. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
9
Abnormal relationships between local and global brain measures in subjects at clinical high risk for psychosis: a pilot study.临床精神病高危人群局部和全脑测量指标之间的异常关系:一项初步研究。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2018 Aug;12(4):974-988. doi: 10.1007/s11682-017-9758-z.
10
Altered relationships between age and functional brain activation in adolescents at clinical high risk for psychosis.青少年精神病高危人群中,年龄与大脑功能激活之间关系的改变。
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Jan 30;221(1):21-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2013.08.004. Epub 2013 Oct 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurocognitive resilience as a predictor of psychosis onset and functional outcomes in individuals at high risk.神经认知恢复力作为高危个体精神病发作及功能转归的预测指标。
BMC Med. 2025 Apr 24;23(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04059-1.
2
The Psychosis MRI Shared Data Resource (Psy-ShareD).精神病磁共振成像共享数据资源(Psy-ShareD)。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2025 Feb 15;46(3):e70165. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70165.
3
Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Community-Recruited Individuals at Clinical High-Risk for Psychosis: Results From the Youth Mental Health Risk and Resilience Study (YouR-Study).

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Hippocampal Glutamate Levels With Adverse Outcomes in Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.海马谷氨酸水平与精神病临床高危个体不良结局的关联。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Feb 1;76(2):199-207. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3252.
2
Prediction Models of Functional Outcomes for Individuals in the Clinical High-Risk State for Psychosis or With Recent-Onset Depression: A Multimodal, Multisite Machine Learning Analysis.精神分裂症临床高危状态或近期首发抑郁个体的功能结局预测模型:多模态、多中心机器学习分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Nov 1;75(11):1156-1172. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.2165.
3
社区招募的临床高危精神病个体的临床和功能结局:青年心理健康风险与复原力研究(YouR-Study)的结果
Schizophr Bull Open. 2024 Nov 12;5(1):sgae029. doi: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgae029. eCollection 2024 Jan.
4
Meta-analysis of Face Perception in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: Evidence for Differential Impairment in Emotion Face Perception.精神分裂症谱系障碍中面部感知的荟萃分析:情绪面部感知差异受损的证据
Schizophr Bull. 2024 Dec 20;51(1):17-36. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbae130.
5
Emotional Response to Humour Perception and Gelotophobia Among Healthy Individuals and Patients with Schizophrenia and Depression, with Signs of a High Clinical Risk of Psychosis.健康个体、精神分裂症患者、抑郁症患者以及有精神病高临床风险迹象者对幽默感知和恐笑症的情绪反应
Consort Psychiatr. 2021 Mar 20;2(1):8-17. doi: 10.17816/CP65.
6
Face and emotion recognition in individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia, ultra-high risk for psychosis, unaffected siblings, and healthy controls in a sample from Turkey.来自土耳其的一个样本中,对被诊断为精神分裂症、精神病超高风险个体、未受影响的兄弟姐妹以及健康对照者进行面部和情绪识别。
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2024 Feb 3;36:100301. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2024.100301. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
Compulsive-like Behaviors in Amyloid-β 1-42-Induced Alzheimer's Disease in Mice Are Associated With Hippocampo-cortical Neural Circuit Dysfunction.淀粉样蛋白β1-42诱导的小鼠阿尔茨海默病中的强迫样行为与海马-皮质神经回路功能障碍有关。
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2023 Mar 7;3(4):773-784. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2023.02.009. eCollection 2023 Oct.
8
Chaos analysis of the brain topology in first-episode psychosis and clinical high risk patients.首发精神病和临床高危患者脑拓扑结构的混沌分析
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 13;13:965128. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.965128. eCollection 2022.
9
European Psychiatric Association guidance on assessment of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia.欧洲精神病学协会关于精神分裂症认知障碍评估的指南。
Eur Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 5;65(1):e58. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2316.
10
Hippocampal circuit dysfunction in psychosis.精神分裂症中的海马回路功能障碍。
Transl Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 25;12(1):344. doi: 10.1038/s41398-022-02115-5.
Hippocampal dysfunction in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia: a selective review and hypothesis for early detection and intervention.
精神分裂症病理生理学中海马功能障碍:选择性综述及早期检测和干预假说。
Mol Psychiatry. 2018 Aug;23(8):1764-1772. doi: 10.1038/mp.2017.249. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
4
Harmonization of cortical thickness measurements across scanners and sites.跨扫描仪和站点的皮质厚度测量的调和。
Neuroimage. 2018 Feb 15;167:104-120. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.024. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
5
Theory of Mind, Emotion Recognition and Social Perception in Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: findings from the NAPLS-2 cohort.临床高危精神病个体的心理理论、情绪识别与社会认知:来自NAPLS-2队列的研究结果
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2015 Sep;2(3):133-139. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2015.04.004. Epub 2015 May 16.
6
Differences in Facial Emotion Recognition between First Episode Psychosis, Borderline Personality Disorder and Healthy Controls.首发精神病、边缘型人格障碍与健康对照者面部情绪识别的差异。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 28;11(7):e0160056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160056. eCollection 2016.
7
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates.聚类失效:为何功能磁共振成像在空间范围推断上存在过高的假阳性率。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jul 12;113(28):7900-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1602413113. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
8
Restricted attention to social cues in schizophrenia patients.精神分裂症患者对社交线索的注意力受限。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2016 Oct;266(7):649-61. doi: 10.1007/s00406-016-0705-6. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
9
Amygdala Hyperactivity in MAM Model of Schizophrenia is Normalized by Peripubertal Diazepam Administration.青春期前给予地西泮可使精神分裂症MAM模型中的杏仁核过度活跃恢复正常。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016 Sep;41(10):2455-62. doi: 10.1038/npp.2016.42. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
10
Emotion recognition and theory of mind are related to gray matter volume of the prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia.情绪识别与心理理论与精神分裂症患者前额叶皮质的灰质体积有关。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016 Feb;26(2):255-264. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.12.013. Epub 2015 Dec 11.