• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Association of Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measures With Psychosis Onset in Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Developing Psychosis: An ENIGMA Working Group Mega-analysis.结构磁共振成像指标与处于精神病发病高风险的个体出现精神病的关联性:一项 ENIGMA 工作组的荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 1;78(7):753-766. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0638.
2
Normative Modeling of Brain Morphometry in Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.临床精神病高危人群脑形态计量学的规范建模。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 1;81(1):77-88. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.3850.
3
Using brain structural neuroimaging measures to predict psychosis onset for individuals at clinical high-risk.利用大脑结构神经影像学测量来预测临床高风险个体的精神病发病。
Mol Psychiatry. 2024 May;29(5):1465-1477. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02426-7. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
4
Association of Adverse Outcomes With Emotion Processing and Its Neural Substrate in Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.个体处于精神病临床高风险时,情绪处理及其神经基质与不良结果的关联。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 1;77(2):190-200. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.3501.
5
Baseline Cortical Thickness Reductions in Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: Brain Regions Associated with Conversion to Psychosis Versus Non-Conversion as Assessed at One-Year Follow-Up in the Shanghai-At-Risk-for-Psychosis (SHARP) Study.首发精神病高危人群的皮层厚度基线降低:基于上海首发精神病高危人群研究(SHARP)一年随访的转换与非转换比较,探讨与转换至精神病相关的脑区。
Schizophr Bull. 2021 Mar 16;47(2):562-574. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbaa127.
6
Cortical abnormalities in youth at clinical high-risk for psychosis: Findings from the NAPLS2 cohort.青年精神病高危人群的皮质异常:NAPLS2 队列研究结果。
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;23:101862. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101862. Epub 2019 May 23.
7
Use of Machine Learning to Determine Deviance in Neuroanatomical Maturity Associated With Future Psychosis in Youths at Clinically High Risk.利用机器学习确定与临床高风险青年未来精神病相关的神经解剖成熟度偏差。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 1;75(9):960-968. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.1543.
8
Progressive reduction in cortical thickness as psychosis develops: a multisite longitudinal neuroimaging study of youth at elevated clinical risk.精神病发展过程中皮质厚度的逐渐减少:一项针对临床风险较高的青少年的多中心纵向神经影像学研究。
Biol Psychiatry. 2015 Jan 15;77(2):147-57. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.05.023. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
9
Age-related change in cortical thickness in adolescents at clinical high risk for psychosis: a longitudinal study.青少年精神病高危人群皮质厚度的年龄相关性变化:一项纵向研究。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 Jun;33(6):1837-1846. doi: 10.1007/s00787-023-02278-6. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
10
Ventricular enlargement and progressive reduction of cortical gray matter are linked in prodromal youth who develop psychosis.脑室扩大与皮质灰质进行性减少在出现精神病前驱症状的青年中相关。
Schizophr Res. 2017 Nov;189:169-174. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.02.014. Epub 2017 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Neuroimaging Data Informed Mood and Psychosis Diagnosis Using an Ensemble Deep Multimodal Framework.使用集成深度多模态框架的神经影像学数据助力情绪和精神病诊断。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2025 Sep;46(13):e70347. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70347.
2
Superpixel-ComBat modeling: A joint approach for harmonization and characterization of inter-scanner variability in T1-weighted images.超像素ComBat建模:一种用于协调和表征T1加权图像中扫描仪间变异性的联合方法。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 Oct 3;2. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00306. eCollection 2024.
3
The predictive role of family history of antipsychotic drug use in poor outcomes following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH).抗精神病药物使用家族史在动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)后不良预后中的预测作用。
Brain Spine. 2025 Jul 3;5:104317. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104317. eCollection 2025.
4
Tobacco Smoking and Gray Matter Volume in Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: A Longitudinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.精神病临床高危个体的吸烟与灰质体积:一项纵向磁共振成像研究
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2025 May 27;5(5):100539. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2025.100539. eCollection 2025 Sep.
5
Overlapping structural and functional connectivity disruptions in clinical high-risk for psychosis participants: A network analysis study.精神病临床高危参与者中重叠的结构和功能连接中断:一项网络分析研究。
Neuroimage Clin. 2025 May 12;47:103803. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2025.103803.
6
Cortical differences across psychiatric disorders and associated common and rare genetic variants.跨精神疾病的皮质差异以及相关的常见和罕见基因变异。
medRxiv. 2025 Apr 19:2025.04.16.25325971. doi: 10.1101/2025.04.16.25325971.
7
The MR neuroimaging protocol for the Accelerating Medicines Partnership® Schizophrenia Program.加速药物合作组织精神分裂症项目的磁共振神经成像方案。
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2025 Apr 2;11(1):52. doi: 10.1038/s41537-025-00581-6.
8
Neurocognitive Deficits in Individuals at Ultra-High-Risk for Psychosis: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.超高危精神病个体的神经认知缺陷:系统评价概述
Iran J Psychiatry. 2025 Jan;20(1):111-125. doi: 10.18502/ijps.v20i1.17405.
9
Macro- and Microstructural Alterations in the Midbrain in Early Psychosis Associates with Clinical Symptom Scores.早期精神病患者中脑的宏观和微观结构改变与临床症状评分相关。
eNeuro. 2025 Mar 19;12(3). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0361-24.2025. Print 2025 Mar.
10
The Psychosis MRI Shared Data Resource (Psy-ShareD).精神病磁共振成像共享数据资源(Psy-ShareD)。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2025 Feb 15;46(3):e70165. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70165.

本文引用的文献

1
Baseline Cortical Thickness Reductions in Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: Brain Regions Associated with Conversion to Psychosis Versus Non-Conversion as Assessed at One-Year Follow-Up in the Shanghai-At-Risk-for-Psychosis (SHARP) Study.首发精神病高危人群的皮层厚度基线降低:基于上海首发精神病高危人群研究(SHARP)一年随访的转换与非转换比较,探讨与转换至精神病相关的脑区。
Schizophr Bull. 2021 Mar 16;47(2):562-574. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbaa127.
2
Virtual Histology of Cortical Thickness and Shared Neurobiology in 6 Psychiatric Disorders.6 种精神障碍的皮质厚度虚拟组织学和共同神经生物学
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 1;78(1):47-63. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.2694.
3
Assessment of Neurobiological Mechanisms of Cortical Thinning During Childhood and Adolescence and Their Implications for Psychiatric Disorders.评估儿童和青少年时期皮质变薄的神经生物学机制及其对精神障碍的影响。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 1;77(11):1127-1136. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.1495.
4
Increased power by harmonizing structural MRI site differences with the ComBat batch adjustment method in ENIGMA.利用 ENIGMA 中的 ComBat 批量调整方法协调结构 MRI 站点差异来提高效能。
Neuroimage. 2020 Sep;218:116956. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116956. Epub 2020 May 26.
5
Going Upstream to Advance Psychosis Prevention and Improve Public Health.溯源而上,推进精神病预防并改善公众健康。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 1;77(7):665-666. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.0142.
6
The genetic architecture of the human cerebral cortex.人类大脑皮层的遗传结构。
Science. 2020 Mar 20;367(6484). doi: 10.1126/science.aay6690.
7
Mapping Subcortical Brain Alterations in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome: Effects of Deletion Size and Convergence With Idiopathic Neuropsychiatric Illness.22q11.2 缺失综合征患者皮质下脑区改变的定位:缺失大小的影响及与特发性神经精神疾病的趋同。
Am J Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 1;177(7):589-600. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.19060583. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
8
The influence of risk factors on the onset and outcome of psychosis: What we learned from the GAP study.风险因素对精神病发病和结局的影响:我们从 GAP 研究中学到了什么。
Schizophr Res. 2020 Nov;225:63-68. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2020.01.011. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
9
Grey-matter abnormalities in clinical high-risk participants for psychosis.临床高危精神病患者的灰质异常。
Schizophr Res. 2020 Dec;226:120-128. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.08.034. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
10
Polygenic Risk Score Contribution to Psychosis Prediction in a Target Population of Persons at Clinical High Risk.多基因风险评分对临床高风险人群精神分裂症预测的贡献。
Am J Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 1;177(2):155-163. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.18060721. Epub 2019 Nov 12.

结构磁共振成像指标与处于精神病发病高风险的个体出现精神病的关联性:一项 ENIGMA 工作组的荟萃分析。

Association of Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measures With Psychosis Onset in Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Developing Psychosis: An ENIGMA Working Group Mega-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 1;78(7):753-766. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0638.

DOI:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0638
PMID:33950164
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8100913/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The ENIGMA clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis initiative, the largest pooled neuroimaging sample of individuals at CHR to date, aims to discover robust neurobiological markers of psychosis risk.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate baseline structural neuroimaging differences between individuals at CHR and healthy controls as well as between participants at CHR who later developed a psychotic disorder (CHR-PS+) and those who did not (CHR-PS-).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this case-control study, baseline T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data were pooled from 31 international sites participating in the ENIGMA Clinical High Risk for Psychosis Working Group. CHR status was assessed using the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States or Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes. MRI scans were processed using harmonized protocols and analyzed within a mega-analysis and meta-analysis framework from January to October 2020.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Measures of regional cortical thickness (CT), surface area, and subcortical volumes were extracted from T1-weighted MRI scans. Independent variables were group (CHR group vs control group) and conversion status (CHR-PS+ group vs CHR-PS- group vs control group).

RESULTS

Of the 3169 included participants, 1428 (45.1%) were female, and the mean (SD; range) age was 21.1 (4.9; 9.5-39.9) years. This study included 1792 individuals at CHR and 1377 healthy controls. Using longitudinal clinical information, 253 in the CHR-PS+ group, 1234 in the CHR-PS- group, and 305 at CHR without follow-up data were identified. Compared with healthy controls, individuals at CHR exhibited widespread lower CT measures (mean [range] Cohen d = -0.13 [-0.17 to -0.09]), but not surface area or subcortical volume. Lower CT measures in the fusiform, superior temporal, and paracentral regions were associated with psychosis conversion (mean Cohen d = -0.22; 95% CI, -0.35 to 0.10). Among healthy controls, compared with those in the CHR-PS+ group, age showed a stronger negative association with left fusiform CT measures (F = 9.8; P < .001; q < .001) and left paracentral CT measures (F = 5.9; P = .005; q = .02). Effect sizes representing lower CT associated with psychosis conversion resembled patterns of CT differences observed in ENIGMA studies of schizophrenia (ρ = 0.35; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.55; P = .004) and individuals with 22q11.2 microdeletion syndrome and a psychotic disorder diagnosis (ρ = 0.43; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.61; P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study provides evidence for widespread subtle, lower CT measures in individuals at CHR. The pattern of CT measure differences in those in the CHR-PS+ group was similar to those reported in other large-scale investigations of psychosis. Additionally, a subset of these regions displayed abnormal age associations. Widespread disruptions in CT coupled with abnormal age associations in those at CHR may point to disruptions in postnatal brain developmental processes.

摘要

重要性

ENIGMA 临床高风险(CHR)精神分裂症倡议是迄今为止最大的 CHR 神经影像学样本库,旨在发现精神分裂症风险的稳健神经生物学标志物。

目的

研究 CHR 个体与健康对照组之间以及后来发展为精神病障碍(CHR-PS+)和未发展为精神病障碍(CHR-PS-)的 CHR 参与者之间的基线结构神经影像学差异。

设计、地点和参与者:在这项病例对照研究中,从参与 ENIGMA 临床高风险精神分裂症工作组的 31 个国际站点汇总了基线 T1 加权磁共振成像(MRI)数据。使用全面评估风险精神状态或结构化前驱综合征访谈来评估 CHR 状态。使用协调的协议处理 MRI 扫描,并在 2020 年 1 月至 10 月期间在 mega 分析和荟萃分析框架内进行分析。

主要结果和测量

从 T1 加权 MRI 扫描中提取了区域皮质厚度(CT)、表面积和皮质下体积的测量值。自变量为组(CHR 组与对照组)和转换状态(CHR-PS+组与 CHR-PS-组与对照组)。

结果

在纳入的 3169 名参与者中,1428 名(45.1%)为女性,平均(SD;范围)年龄为 21.1(4.9;9.5-39.9)岁。本研究包括 1792 名 CHR 患者和 1377 名健康对照者。使用纵向临床信息,确定了 253 名 CHR-PS+组、1234 名 CHR-PS-组和 305 名 CHR 无随访数据的患者。与健康对照组相比,CHR 患者表现出广泛的 CT 测量值降低(平均[范围]Cohen d = -0.13[-0.17 至-0.09]),但表面积或皮质下体积没有降低。梭状回、上颞叶和旁中央区域的 CT 测量值降低与精神病转化相关(平均 Cohen d = -0.22;95%CI,-0.35 至 0.10)。在健康对照组中,与 CHR-PS+组相比,年龄与左侧梭状回 CT 测量值(F = 9.8;P <.001;q <.001)和左侧旁中央 CT 测量值(F = 5.9;P =.005;q =.02)呈更强的负相关。与精神病转化相关的 CT 较低的效应大小与 ENIGMA 精神分裂症研究中观察到的 CT 差异模式相似(ρ=0.35;95%CI,0.12 至 0.55;P =.004)和 22q11.2 微缺失综合征伴精神病诊断的个体(ρ=0.43;95%CI,0.20 至 0.61;P =.001)。

结论和相关性

本研究为 CHR 患者广泛存在轻微、较低的 CT 测量值提供了证据。CHR-PS+组的 CT 测量值差异模式与其他大型精神病研究报告的模式相似。此外,这些区域中的一部分显示出异常的年龄相关性。CHR 患者的 CT 广泛破坏以及与年龄的异常相关性可能表明出生后大脑发育过程的破坏。