Ethology and Animal Welfare Section, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, E-46115 Alfara del Patriarca, Valencia, Spain.
Ethology and Animal Welfare Section, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, E-46115 Alfara del Patriarca, Valencia, Spain.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Feb;190:104715. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104715. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
Our capacity to attribute mental states to others, or theory of mind (ToM), affects the way in which we manage social interactions. Likewise, the social scenario in which we find ourselves probably influences our use of ToM. In this study, 6-year-old children and adult women participated in pairs in a task where participants needed to infer their partner's behavior considering the partner's visual perception (Experiment 1), knowledge (Experiment 2), and false belief (Experiment 3) regarding the placement of rewards under cups. The results were analyzed according to the temporal direction of the inference (past or future behavior of the partner), the social context (competition or cooperation), and-in the case of women-the type of social relationship with their partner (another adult or their own child). Children solved only the visual perception task, and adults solved the three tasks but performed better in the visual perception task than in the false belief task, suggesting that not only developmental issues but also differences in the intrinsic difficulty of the tasks underlie children's results. The temporal direction of the inference, in contrast, did not influence their results. Whereas children performed better in the competition context, adults performed better in the cooperation context in one experiment. Moreover, women avoided competing against their own child, and even cooperated with her or him when this was against their own interest, suggesting that cooperation between mothers and children might have been a key driving force in the evolution of ToM in our species.
我们将心理状态归因于他人的能力,或者说心理理论(ToM),影响着我们管理社交互动的方式。同样,我们所处的社交环境可能也会影响我们对 ToM 的使用。在这项研究中,6 岁的儿童和成年女性成对参与了一项任务,在这项任务中,参与者需要根据他们的合作伙伴的视觉感知(实验 1)、知识(实验 2)和关于奖励在杯子下的错误信念(实验 3)来推断他们的合作伙伴的行为。结果根据推理的时间方向(合作伙伴的过去或未来行为)、社会背景(竞争或合作)以及女性与合作伙伴的社会关系类型(另一位成年人或自己的孩子)进行了分析。儿童只解决了视觉感知任务,而成年人则解决了三个任务,但在视觉感知任务中的表现优于错误信念任务,这表明不仅是发展问题,而且任务本身的内在难度差异也是导致儿童结果的原因。相比之下,推理的时间方向并没有影响他们的结果。虽然儿童在竞争环境下表现更好,但在一个实验中,成年人在合作环境下表现更好。此外,女性避免与自己的孩子竞争,即使这违背了自己的利益,她们也会与孩子合作,这表明母亲和孩子之间的合作可能是我们物种中 ToM 进化的关键驱动力。