• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

这不仅仅与你有关:交际合作取决于你自己和你伙伴的心理理论能力。

It is not all about you: Communicative cooperation is determined by your partner's theory of mind abilities as well as your own.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Birmingham.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2024 May;50(5):833-844. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001268. Epub 2023 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1037/xlm0001268
PMID:37439728
Abstract

We investigated the relationship between Theory of Mind (ToM) and communicative cooperation. Specifically, we examined whether communicative cooperation is affected by the ToM ability of one's cooperative partner as well as their own. ToM is the attribution of mental states to oneself and others; cooperation is the joint action that leads to achieving a shared goal. We measured cooperation using a novel communicative cooperation game completed by participants in pairs. ToM was measured via the Movies for Assessment of Social Cognition (MASC) task and fluid intelligence via the Raven task. Findings of 350 adults show that ToM scores of both players were predictors of cooperative failure, whereas Raven scores were not. Furthermore, participants were split into low- and high-ToM groups through a median split of the MASC scores: high-ToM individuals committed significantly fewer cooperative errors compared to their low-ToM counterparts. Therefore, we found a direct relationship between ToM and cooperation. Interestingly, we also examined how ToM scores of paired participants determine cooperation. We found that pairs with two high-ToM individuals committed significantly fewer errors compared to pairs with two low-ToM individuals. We speculate that reduced cooperation in low-low ToM pairs is a result of less efficient development of conceptual alignment and recovery from misalignment, compared to high-high ToM dyads. For the first time, we thus demonstrate that it is not all about you; both cooperative partners make key, independent, contributions to cooperative outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

我们研究了心理理论(ToM)与交际合作之间的关系。具体来说,我们检验了交际合作是否受到合作伙伴的 ToM 能力以及自身 ToM 能力的影响。ToM 是指将心理状态归因于自己和他人的能力;合作是指导致实现共同目标的共同行动。我们使用参与者在配对中完成的新颖交际合作游戏来衡量合作。通过电影评估社会认知(MASC)任务测量 ToM,通过瑞文任务测量流体智力。350 名成年人的研究结果表明,两名参与者的 ToM 分数都是合作失败的预测因素,而 Raven 分数则不是。此外,通过 MASC 分数的中位数分割,将参与者分为低 ToM 和高 ToM 组:高 ToM 个体与低 ToM 个体相比,合作错误明显减少。因此,我们发现 ToM 与合作之间存在直接关系。有趣的是,我们还研究了配对参与者的 ToM 分数如何决定合作。我们发现,两名高 ToM 个体组成的配对比两名低 ToM 个体组成的配对错误明显减少。我们推测,与高-高 ToM 对子相比,低-低 ToM 对子的合作减少是由于概念对齐的效率降低和从失配中恢复的效率降低所致。我们首次证明,这不仅仅与你有关;两个合作伙伴对合作结果都做出了关键的、独立的贡献。

相似文献

1
It is not all about you: Communicative cooperation is determined by your partner's theory of mind abilities as well as your own.这不仅仅与你有关:交际合作取决于你自己和你伙伴的心理理论能力。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2024 May;50(5):833-844. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001268. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
2
Competitive children, cooperative mothers? Effect of various social factors on the retrospective and prospective use of theory of mind.竞争型儿童,合作型母亲?各种社会因素对心理理论回溯和前瞻使用的影响。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Feb;190:104715. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104715. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
3
Emotion perception, non-social cognition and symptoms as predictors of theory of mind in schizophrenia.情绪感知、非社会性认知和症状作为精神分裂症患者心理理论的预测指标。
Compr Psychiatry. 2018 Aug;85:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
4
Human and macaque pairs employ different coordination strategies in a transparent decision game.在透明决策游戏中,人类和猕猴对使用不同的协调策略。
Elife. 2023 Jan 12;12:e81641. doi: 10.7554/eLife.81641.
5
Why Is Theory of Mind Important for Referential Communication?为什么心理理论对指称性交流很重要?
Curr Psychol. 2018;37(1):82-97. doi: 10.1007/s12144-016-9492-5. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
6
Do executive function and theory of mind predict pragmatic abilities following traumatic brain injury? An analysis of sincere, deceitful and ironic communicative acts.执行功能和心理理论能否预测创伤性脑损伤后的语用能力?对真诚、欺骗和讽刺性交际行为的分析。
J Commun Disord. 2018 Sep-Oct;75:102-117. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 May 26.
7
Distinct neural patterns of social cognition for cooperation versus competition.合作与竞争中社会认知的不同神经模式。
Neuroimage. 2016 Aug 15;137:86-96. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.069. Epub 2016 May 7.
8
Investigating ToM in aging with the MASC: from accuracy to error type.使用MASC研究衰老过程中的心理理论:从准确性到错误类型
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2019 Jul;26(4):541-557. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2018.1500996. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
9
Gaze patterns and brain activations in humans and marmosets in the Frith-Happé theory-of-mind animation task.人类和狨猴在 Frith-Happé 心理理论动画任务中的注视模式和大脑活动。
Elife. 2023 Jul 14;12:e86327. doi: 10.7554/eLife.86327.
10
Neuropsychological correlates of theory of mind in chronic migraine.慢性偏头痛患者心理理论的神经心理学相关性。
Neuropsychology. 2022 Nov;36(8):753-763. doi: 10.1037/neu0000852. Epub 2022 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Brain-to-brain coupling forecasts future joint action outcomes.脑对脑耦合可预测未来的联合行动结果。
iScience. 2024 Aug 23;27(9):110802. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110802. eCollection 2024 Sep 20.