Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science University of The Ryukyus, 207, Uehara, Nishihara, Okinawa, 903-0215, Japan.
Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Science University of The Ryukyus, 207, Uehara, Nishihara, Okinawa, 903-0215, Japan.
Eur Radiol. 2020 Mar;30(3):1525-1533. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06454-8. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of radiotherapy (RT) combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with RT alone for the treatment of bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
We included in this retrospective study 25 RCC patients (28 bone metastases), who were treated with RT at our institution. Patients were divided into two groups: patients treated with RT alone (monotherapy group; n = 17) and those treated with RT combined with TACE (combined therapy group; n = 11). The administered median RT dose was 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Anti-cancer agents used in TACE were cisplatin (median dose, 50 mg) and carboplatin (median dose, 240 mg) for patients with reduced renal function. We evaluated the objective response, post-RT-skeletal-related event (PR-SRE)-free rate, and adverse events associated with treatment for each group.
The objective response rates for bone metastases in the monotherapy and combined therapy groups were 33% and 82%, respectively (p = 0.009). The 2-year PR-SRE-free rate in the monotherapy and combined therapy groups was 41.8% and 100%, respectively (p = 0.009). The objective response and PR-SRE-free rates were significantly superior in the combined therapy than in the monotherapy group. There were no significant differences in adverse events or survival between the two groups.
RT combined with TACE is a promising treatment for bone metastases from RCC, as it results in higher objective response, and PR-SRE-free rates compared with RT alone.
• Skeletal-related events (SREs) are common in patients with bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC). • Radiotherapy (RT) provides pain relief in patients with bone metastases from RCC, but rarely achieves objective response. • Combination of RT with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization results in higher objective response and post-RT-SRE-free rates compared with RT alone and is a promising treatment for bone metastases from RCC, as it.
本研究旨在比较放疗(RT)联合经导管动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)与单纯 RT 治疗肾细胞癌(RCC)骨转移的疗效。
我们回顾性分析了在我院接受 RT 治疗的 25 例 RCC 患者(28 处骨转移病灶)。患者分为两组:单纯 RT 治疗组(n=17)和 RT 联合 TACE 治疗组(n=11)。给予的中位 RT 剂量为 30Gy,分 10 次给予。对于肾功能不全的患者,TACE 中使用的抗癌药物为顺铂(中位剂量 50mg)和卡铂(中位剂量 240mg)。我们评估了每组的客观缓解率、RT 后骨骼相关事件(PR-SRE)无进展率和与治疗相关的不良事件。
单纯 RT 治疗组和 RT 联合 TACE 治疗组的骨转移客观缓解率分别为 33%和 82%(p=0.009)。单纯 RT 治疗组和 RT 联合 TACE 治疗组的 2 年 PR-SRE 无进展率分别为 41.8%和 100%(p=0.009)。联合 TACE 治疗组的客观缓解率和 PR-SRE 无进展率明显优于单纯 RT 治疗组。两组不良事件或生存无显著差异。
与单纯 RT 相比,RT 联合 TACE 治疗 RCC 骨转移具有更高的客观缓解率和 PR-SRE 无进展率,是一种有前途的治疗方法。
骨骼相关事件(SREs)在肾细胞癌(RCC)骨转移患者中很常见。
放疗(RT)可缓解 RCC 骨转移患者的疼痛,但很少能获得客观缓解。
RT 联合经导管动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)治疗可获得比单纯 RT 更高的客观缓解率和 PR-SRE 无进展率,是治疗 RCC 骨转移的一种有前途的方法。