Korea Biochar Research Center, O-Jeong Eco-Resilience Institute (OJERI), Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
University of Wuppertal, School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Institute of Foundation Engineering, Water- and Waste-Management, Laboratory of Soil- and Groundwater-Management, Pauluskirchstraße 7, 42285 Wuppertal, Germany; King Abdulaziz University, Faculty of Meteorology, Environment, and Arid Land Agriculture, Department of Arid Land Agriculture, 21589 Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; University of Kafrelsheikh, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Soil and Water Sciences, 33 516 Kafr El-Sheikh, Egypt.
Environ Int. 2020 Jan;134:105046. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105046. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
Soil contamination by potentially toxic elements (PTEs) has led to adverse environmental impacts. In this review, we discussed remediation of PTEs contaminated soils through immobilization techniques using different soil amendments with respect to type of element, soil, and amendment, immobilization efficiency, underlying mechanisms, and field applicability. Soil amendments such as manure, compost, biochar, clay minerals, phosphate compounds, coal fly ash, and liming materials are widely used as immobilizing agents for PTEs. Among these soil amendments, biochar has attracted increased interest over the past few years because of its promising surface properties. Integrated application of appropriate amendments is also recommended to maximize their use efficiency. These amendments can reduce PTE bioavailability in soils through diverse mechanisms such as precipitation, complexation, redox reactions, ion exchange, and electrostatic interaction. However, soil properties such as soil pH, and clay, sesquioxides and organic matter content, and processes, such as sorption/desorption and redox processes, are the key factors governing the amendments' efficacy for PTEs immobilization in soils. Selecting proper immobilizing agents can yield cost-effective remediation techniques and fulfill green and sustainable remediation principles. Furthermore, long-term stability of immobilized PTE compounds and the environmental impacts and cost effectiveness of the amendments should be considered before application.
土壤中潜在有毒元素 (PTEs) 的污染已经对环境造成了不利影响。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了通过使用不同的土壤改良剂来固定 PTEs 污染土壤的修复技术,这些改良剂包括元素类型、土壤类型和改良剂类型、固定效率、潜在机制和田间适用性。有机肥、堆肥、生物炭、粘土矿物、磷酸盐化合物、粉煤灰和石灰材料等土壤改良剂被广泛用作 PTEs 的固定剂。在这些土壤改良剂中,生物炭因其有前途的表面性质而在过去几年中引起了越来越多的关注。还建议综合应用适当的改良剂以最大程度地提高其使用效率。这些改良剂可以通过多种机制降低土壤中 PTE 的生物利用度,例如沉淀、络合、氧化还原反应、离子交换和静电相互作用。然而,土壤性质,如土壤 pH 值、粘土、三氧化物和有机质含量,以及吸附/解吸和氧化还原过程等过程,是控制改良剂在土壤中固定 PTEs 效果的关键因素。选择合适的固定剂可以产生具有成本效益的修复技术,并满足绿色和可持续修复原则。此外,在应用之前,应考虑固定化 PTE 化合物的长期稳定性以及改良剂的环境影响和成本效益。