• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

北美胸部放射学中的性别差异。

Gender Disparity in Chest Radiology in North America.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Department of Radiology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA.

出版信息

Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2021 Jan-Feb;50(1):18-22. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2019.10.001. Epub 2019 Oct 21.

DOI:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2019.10.001
PMID:31732263
Abstract

PURPOSE

In the current cultural climate, gender disparity is a topical and contentious issue. In academic medicine, there is an underrepresentation of female faculty in leadership positions with lower research output and fewer grant awards. We study the gender differences in faculty rank, leadership positions, and research output among chest radiologists in North America.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A list of clinical faculty at radiology programs in North America was obtained using the FREIDA database and program websites. Demographic information and data pertaining to academic rank, peer-reviewed publications, and research productivity of each chest radiologist was obtained from Doximity and SCOPUS databases.

RESULTS

Four hundred ten (281 male:129 female) academic chest radiologists were included. Females were underrepresented at senior faculty level accounting for 18.8% (n = 21) of full, 29.2% (n = 21) of associate and 40.7% (n = 61) of assistant professors. 23.1% (n = 14) of department chiefs were women. Women were more likely to occupy a faculty position in chest radiology in Canada than in US (P < 0.05). The median H-index, and numbers of publications and citations were lower for females than male faculty (P < 0.05). Male faculty had more years of experience - median of 19 years, 16.5 years for females (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Gender disparity exists in chest radiology with similar male predominance in terms of senior faculty rank, leadership roles, and research productivity to other medical specialties. The observed deficiency of research and scholarly output among female chest radiologists and the paucity of aspirational female radiologists in senior academic/leadership positions are factors which perpetuate this gender disparity and contribute to persistence of the gender pay gap.

摘要

目的

在当前的文化氛围中,性别差异是一个热门且有争议的话题。在学术医学领域,女性在领导层中的代表性不足,她们的研究产出较低,获得的资助较少。我们研究了北美胸部放射学家的教职等级、领导职位和研究成果方面的性别差异。

材料和方法

使用 FREIDA 数据库和项目网站获取北美放射学项目的临床教师名单。从 Doximity 和 SCOPUS 数据库中获取每位胸部放射学家的人口统计学信息以及与学术职称、同行评议出版物和研究生产力相关的数据。

结果

共纳入 410 名(281 名男性:129 名女性)学术胸部放射学家。在资深教职人员中,女性的代表性不足,占全职教授的 18.8%(n=21),副教授的 29.2%(n=21),助理教授的 40.7%(n=61)。23.1%(n=14)的系主任是女性。与美国相比,加拿大女性更有可能在胸部放射学领域担任教职(P<0.05)。女性的 H 指数中位数以及出版物和引用数量均低于男性教职人员(P<0.05)。男性教职人员的工作经验中位数为 19 年,女性为 16.5 年(P<0.05)。

结论

胸部放射学领域存在性别差异,与其他医学专业一样,高级教职、领导角色和研究生产力方面男性占主导地位。观察到女性胸部放射学家的研究和学术产出不足,以及高级学术/领导职位中缺乏有抱负的女性放射学家,这些因素是导致这种性别差异持续存在并导致性别薪酬差距的原因。

相似文献

1
Gender Disparity in Chest Radiology in North America.北美胸部放射学中的性别差异。
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2021 Jan-Feb;50(1):18-22. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2019.10.001. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
2
Academic Radiology in the United States: Defining Gender Disparities in Faculty Leadership and Academic Rank.美国学术放射学:界定教员领导力和学术职级中的性别差异。
Acad Radiol. 2022 May;29(5):714-725. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.05.016. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
3
Examining Gender Disparity in Academic Abdominal Radiology in North America.北美腹部放射学学术领域中的性别差异研究
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2021 Sep-Oct;50(5):669-674. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2020.09.001. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
4
Gender Differences Among Academic Pediatric Radiology Faculty in the United States and Canada.美国和加拿大儿科放射学学术领域的性别差异。
Acad Radiol. 2020 Apr;27(4):575-581. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.06.011. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
5
Gender Disparity Among Leaders of Canadian Academic Radiology Departments.加拿大学术放射科系领导中的性别差距。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Jan;214(1):3-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20992. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
6
Gender Differences in Faculty Rank and Leadership Positions Among Hematologists and Oncologists in the United States.美国血液学家和肿瘤学家的教职等级和领导职位中的性别差异。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 Jun;16(6):e507-e516. doi: 10.1200/OP.19.00255. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
7
Gender disparity in academic advancement: exploring differences among adult and pediatric radiologists.性别在学术晋升中的差异:探究成人放射科医生和儿科放射科医生之间的差异。
Pediatr Radiol. 2023 Mar;53(3):487-492. doi: 10.1007/s00247-022-05547-9. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
8
Influences for Gender Disparity in the Radiology Societies in North America.北美放射学会中的性别差异影响因素。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Oct;211(4):831-838. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.19741. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
9
Influences for Gender Disparity in Academic Neuroradiology.学术神经放射学中的性别差异的影响因素。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Jan;39(1):18-23. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5443. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
10
Gender Disparity in Radiology Society Committees and Leadership in North America and Comparison With Other Continents.北美放射学会委员会和领导层中的性别差距及其与其他各大洲的比较。
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2021 Nov-Dec;50(6):835-841. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2020.09.011. Epub 2020 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Gender Differences Among Academic Radiation Oncology National Institutes of Health (NIH) Funding Recipients.美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)资助的学术放射肿瘤学领域受资助者中的性别差异。
Cureus. 2022 Sep 9;14(9):e28982. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28982. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Racial and Gender Diversity Among Students and Faculty in EHAC-Accredited Environmental Health Sciences Programs: Trend Analysis from 2009 to 2021.获得EHAC认证的环境卫生科学项目中,学生和教员的种族与性别多样性:2009年至2021年的趋势分析
Environ Health Insights. 2022 Jul 22;16:11786302221112917. doi: 10.1177/11786302221112917. eCollection 2022.
3
Is Empowerment of Female Radiologists Still Needed? Findings of a Systematic Review.
女放射科医生的赋权是否仍然必要?系统评价的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 5;18(4):1542. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041542.