The Center for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome and the Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Mo.
The Center for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome and the Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Mo.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2020 Jan;8(1):118-126. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.08.011. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
To assess the utilization and consequences of upper extremity Duplex ultrasound in the initial diagnostic evaluation of patients with suspected subclavian vein (SCV) thrombosis and venous thoracic outlet syndrome (VTOS).
A retrospective single-center review was conducted for patients that underwent primary surgical treatment for VTOS between 2008 and 2017, in whom an upper extremity ultrasound had been performed as the initial diagnostic test (n = 214). Clinical and treatment characteristics were compared between patients with positive and false-negative ultrasound studies.
There were 122 men (57%) and 92 women (43%) that had presented with spontaneous idiopathic arm swelling, including 28 (13%) with proven pulmonary embolism, at a mean age of 30.7 ± 0.8 years (range 14-69). Upper extremity ultrasound had been performed 23.8 ± 12.2 days after the onset of symptoms, with confirmation of axillary-SCV thrombosis in 169 patients (79%) and negative results in 45 (21%). Of the false-negative ultrasound study reports, only 8 (18%) acknowledged limitations in visualizing the central SCV. Definitive diagnostic imaging (DDI) had been obtained by upper extremity venography in 175 (82%), computed tomography angiography in 24 (11%), and magnetic resonance angiography in 15 (7%), with 142 (66%) undergoing catheter-directed axillary-SCV thrombolysis. The mean interval between initial ultrasound and DDI was 48.9 ± 14.2 days with no significant difference between groups, but patients with a positive ultrasound were more likely to have DDI within 48 hours than those with a false-negative ultrasound (44% vs 24%; P = .02). At the time of surgical treatment, the SCV was widely patent following paraclavicular decompression and external venolysis alone in 74 patients (35%). Patch angioplasty was performed for focal SCV stenosis in 76 (36%) and bypass graft reconstruction for long-segment axillary-SCV occlusion in 63 (29%). Patients with false-negative initial ultrasound studies were significantly more likely to require SCV bypass reconstruction than those with a positive ultrasound (44% vs 25%; P = .02).
Duplex ultrasound has significant limitations in the initial evaluation of patients with suspected SCV thrombosis, with false-negative results in 21% of patients with proven VTOS. This is rarely acknowledged in ultrasound reports, but false-negative ultrasound studies have the potential to delay definitive imaging, thrombolysis, and further treatment for VTOS. Initial false-negative ultrasound results are associated with progressive thrombus extension and a more frequent need for SCV bypass reconstruction at the time of surgical treatment.
评估上肢 Duplex 超声在疑似锁骨下静脉(SCV)血栓形成和静脉胸廓出口综合征(VTOS)患者初始诊断评估中的应用和后果。
对 2008 年至 2017 年间接受 VTOS 原发性手术治疗的患者进行了回顾性单中心研究,其中 214 例患者进行了上肢超声检查作为初始诊断试验(n=214)。比较了超声阳性和假阴性患者的临床和治疗特征。
122 名男性(57%)和 92 名女性(43%)出现自发性特发性手臂肿胀,包括 28 名(13%)确诊为肺栓塞,平均年龄为 30.7±0.8 岁(范围 14-69 岁)。上肢超声检查在症状出现后 23.8±12.2 天进行,169 例(79%)患者腋-SCV 血栓形成阳性,45 例(21%)结果阴性。在假阴性超声研究报告中,只有 8 例(18%)承认在观察中央 SCV 方面存在局限性。175 例(82%)通过上肢静脉造影、24 例(11%)通过计算机断层血管造影术和 15 例(7%)通过磁共振血管造影术获得了明确的诊断影像学(DDI),142 例(66%)接受了导管引导的腋-SCV 溶栓治疗。首次超声与 DDI 之间的平均间隔为 48.9±14.2 天,各组之间无显著差异,但超声阳性患者比超声阴性患者更有可能在 48 小时内进行 DDI(44%比 24%;P=0.02)。在手术治疗时,锁骨下旁减压和外部静脉溶解术可使 74 例患者(35%)的 SCV 广泛通畅。76 例患者(36%)行斑块血管成形术治疗局部 SCV 狭窄,63 例患者(29%)行旁路移植重建治疗长段腋-SCV 闭塞。初始超声检查结果为假阴性的患者明显比超声检查结果为阳性的患者更需要 SCV 旁路重建(44%比 25%;P=0.02)。
Duplex 超声在疑似 SCV 血栓形成患者的初始评估中有显著的局限性,在确诊 VTOS 的患者中,有 21%的患者超声检查结果为假阴性。在超声报告中很少承认这一点,但假阴性的超声检查结果有可能延迟明确的影像学检查、溶栓治疗和 VTOS 的进一步治疗。初次假阴性超声检查结果与血栓进行性延伸相关,并且在手术治疗时更频繁地需要进行 SCV 旁路重建。