• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脆性骨折护理与预防中的质量改进措施。

Quality Improvement Initiatives in Fragility Fracture Care and Prevention.

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

School of Medicine, Sydney Campus, The University of Notre Dame Australia, 140 Broadway, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia.

出版信息

Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2019 Dec;17(6):510-520. doi: 10.1007/s11914-019-00544-8.

DOI:10.1007/s11914-019-00544-8
PMID:31734907
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review sought to describe quality improvement initiatives in fragility fracture care and prevention.

RECENT FINDINGS

A major care gap persists throughout the world in the secondary prevention of fragility fractures. Systematic reviews have confirmed that the Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) model of care is associated with significant improvements in rates of bone mineral density testing, initiation of osteoporosis treatment and adherence with treatment for individuals who sustain fragility fractures. Further, these improvements in the processes of care resulted in significant reductions in refracture risk and lower post-fracture mortality. The primary challenge facing health systems now is to ensure that best practice is delivered effectively in the local healthcare setting. Publication of clinical standards for FLS at the organisational and patient level in combination with the establishment of national registries has provided a mechanism for FLS to benchmark and improve their performance. Major efforts are ongoing at the global, regional and national level to improve the acute care, rehabilitation and secondary prevention for individuals who sustain fragility fractures. Active participation in these initiatives has the potential to eliminate current care gaps in the coming decade.

摘要

目的综述

本文旨在描述脆性骨折治疗和预防方面的质量改进措施。

最近的发现

在脆性骨折的二级预防方面,全世界仍存在一个主要的护理差距。系统评价证实,骨折联络服务(FLS)护理模式与骨密度检测率、骨质疏松症治疗的启动以及脆性骨折患者治疗依从性的显著改善相关。此外,这些护理流程的改进导致骨折再发风险显著降低,骨折后死亡率降低。目前,医疗体系面临的主要挑战是确保在当地医疗环境中有效实施最佳实践。在组织和患者层面发布 FLS 的临床标准,并结合国家登记处的建立,为 FLS 提供了一个基准和改进其绩效的机制。目前正在全球、区域和国家各级做出重大努力,以改善脆性骨折患者的急性护理、康复和二级预防。积极参与这些举措有可能在未来十年消除当前的护理差距。

相似文献

1
Quality Improvement Initiatives in Fragility Fracture Care and Prevention.脆性骨折护理与预防中的质量改进措施。
Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2019 Dec;17(6):510-520. doi: 10.1007/s11914-019-00544-8.
2
Quality improvement initiatives in the care and prevention of fragility fractures in the Asia Pacific region.亚太地区脆性骨折护理和预防的质量改进措施。
Arch Osteoporos. 2022 Aug 20;17(1):115. doi: 10.1007/s11657-022-01153-2.
3
Fracture liaison: A crucial tool in the fight against fragility fracture.骨折联络:防治脆性骨折的重要工具。
Maturitas. 2022 Nov;165:26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2022.07.001. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
4
A patient-level key performance indicator set to measure the effectiveness of fracture liaison services and guide quality improvement: a position paper of the IOF Capture the Fracture Working Group, National Osteoporosis Foundation and Fragility Fracture Network.骨折联络服务有效性测量和质量改进指导的患者层面关键绩效指标集:国际骨质疏松基金会、国家骨质疏松基金会和脆性骨折网络 IOF Capture the Fracture 工作组的立场文件。
Osteoporos Int. 2020 Jul;31(7):1193-1204. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05377-1. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
5
Rush Fracture Liaison Service for capturing "missed opportunities" to treat osteoporosis in patients with fragility fractures.脆性骨折联络服务,以捕捉治疗脆性骨折患者骨质疏松症的“错失机会”。
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Aug;29(8):1861-1874. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4559-9. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
6
Secondary prevention of fragility fractures in Asia Pacific: an educational initiative.亚太地区脆性骨折的二级预防:一项教育举措。
Osteoporos Int. 2020 May;31(5):805-826. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05197-y. Epub 2019 Dec 1.
7
Fracture liaison services for osteoporosis in the Asia-Pacific region: current unmet needs and systematic literature review.亚太地区骨质疏松性骨折联络服务:当前未满足的需求和系统文献回顾。
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Apr;29(4):779-792. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4347-y. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
8
Bridging the osteoporosis treatment gap: performance and cost-effectiveness of a fracture liaison service.弥合骨质疏松症治疗差距:骨折联络服务的成效与成本效益
J Clin Densitom. 2015 Apr-Jun;18(2):150-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2015.01.003. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
9
Capture the Fracture: a Best Practice Framework and global campaign to break the fragility fracture cycle.捕获骨折:打破脆性骨折周期的最佳实践框架和全球运动。
Osteoporos Int. 2013 Aug;24(8):2135-52. doi: 10.1007/s00198-013-2348-z. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
10
Mind the (treatment) gap: a global perspective on current and future strategies for prevention of fragility fractures.关注(治疗)差距:关于预防脆性骨折的当前及未来策略的全球视角
Osteoporos Int. 2017 May;28(5):1507-1529. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3894-y. Epub 2017 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-World Osteoporosis Treatment Gap and Costs in Spain: Data from Women with a First Fragility Fracture or Diagnosis of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.西班牙骨质疏松症的实际治疗差距与成本:来自首次发生脆性骨折或被诊断为绝经后骨质疏松症女性的数据
Rheumatol Ther. 2025 Apr;12(2):315-335. doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00743-5. Epub 2025 Feb 11.
2
A quasi-experimental study about shared decision-making and motivational interviewing on patients with a recent fracture attending Fracture Liaison Services.一项关于在骨折联络服务中对近期骨折患者实施共同决策和动机性访谈的准实验研究。
J Bone Miner Res. 2024 Oct 29;39(11):1584-1595. doi: 10.1093/jbmr/zjae161.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Challenges and opportunities to improve fracture liaison service attendance: fracture registration and patient characteristics and motivations.改善骨折联络服务参与度面临的挑战和机遇:骨折登记和患者特征及动机。
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Aug;30(8):1597-1606. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05016-4. Epub 2019 May 25.
2
An Optimised Fracture Liaison Service Model: Maintained Diagnostic Sensitivity Despite Reduced Number of Diagnostic Tests Performed.一种优化的骨折联络服务模式:在减少诊断测试次数的情况下保持诊断敏感性。
Calcif Tissue Int. 2019 Jun;104(6):641-649. doi: 10.1007/s00223-019-00535-y. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
3
The development of Taiwan Fracture Liaison Service network.
Following hip fracture, hospital organizational factors associated with prescription of anti-osteoporosis medication on discharge, to address imminent refracture risk: a record-linkage study.
髋部骨折后,与出院时开具抗骨质疏松症药物以应对即将发生的再骨折风险相关的医院组织因素:一项基于记录链接的研究。
J Bone Miner Res. 2024 Aug 21;39(8):1071-1082. doi: 10.1093/jbmr/zjae100.
4
Evaluation of fragility fracture risk using deep learning based on ultrasound radio frequency signal.基于超声射频信号的深度学习评估脆性骨折风险。
Endocrine. 2024 Nov;86(2):800-812. doi: 10.1007/s12020-024-03931-z. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
5
The role of the fracture liaison service in the prevention of atypical femoral fractures.骨折联络服务在预防非典型股骨骨折中的作用。
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2023 Nov 28;15:1759720X231212747. doi: 10.1177/1759720X231212747. eCollection 2023.
6
The integrated structure of care: evidence for the efficacy of models of clinical governance in the prevention of fragility fractures after recent sentinel fracture after the age of 50 years.整合护理结构:50 岁以后近期发生哨兵骨折后,临床治理模式在预防脆性骨折方面有效性的证据。
Arch Osteoporos. 2023 Aug 21;18(1):109. doi: 10.1007/s11657-023-01316-9.
7
Development, implementation and evaluation of a multinational FLS mentorship programme in Latin America.在拉丁美洲开发、实施和评估一个多国 FLS 导师计划。
Osteoporos Int. 2023 Nov;34(11):1881-1891. doi: 10.1007/s00198-023-06742-6. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
8
Trends in incidence of recorded diagnosis of osteoporosis, osteopenia, and fragility fractures in people aged 50 years and above: retrospective cohort study using UK primary care data.50 岁及以上人群骨质疏松症、低骨量和脆性骨折记录诊断发病率的趋势:使用英国初级保健数据的回顾性队列研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2023 Aug;34(8):1411-1427. doi: 10.1007/s00198-023-06739-1. Epub 2023 May 10.
9
Digital health interventions for osteoporosis and post-fragility fracture care.用于骨质疏松症和脆性骨折后护理的数字健康干预措施。
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2022 Mar 28;14:1759720X221083523. doi: 10.1177/1759720X221083523. eCollection 2022.
10
Differential miRNA Expression in Osteoporotic Elderly Patients with Hip Fractures Compared to Young Patients.与年轻患者相比,骨质疏松性老年髋部骨折患者的miRNA差异表达
Indian J Orthop. 2021 Nov 13;56(3):399-411. doi: 10.1007/s43465-021-00561-9. eCollection 2022 Mar.
台湾骨折联络服务网络的发展。
Osteoporos Sarcopenia. 2018 Jun;4(2):47-52. doi: 10.1016/j.afos.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
4
High prevalence of vertebral fractures and low trabecular bone score in patients with fragility fractures: A cross-sectional sub-study of NoFRACT.脆性骨折患者的椎体骨折高发率和低小梁骨评分:NoFRACT 的一项横断面亚研究。
Bone. 2019 May;122:14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2019.02.008. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
5
Effect of a Fracture Liaison Service on the Rate of Subsequent Fracture Among Patients With a Fragility Fracture in the Norwegian Capture the Fracture Initiative (NoFRACT): A Trial Protocol.挪威脆性骨折捕获计划(NoFRACT)中骨折联络服务对脆性骨折患者再次骨折率的影响:一项试验方案。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Dec 7;1(8):e185701. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5701.
6
Adherence to osteoporosis therapy after an upper extremity fracture: a pre-specified substudy of the C-STOP randomized controlled trial.上肢骨折后骨质疏松症治疗的依从性:C-STOP 随机对照试验的预先指定亚研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Jan;30(1):127-134. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4702-7. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
7
OFELIA: Prevalence of Osteoporosis in Fragility Fracture Patients.OFELIA:脆性骨折患者骨质疏松症的患病率。
Calcif Tissue Int. 2019 Jan;104(1):102-114. doi: 10.1007/s00223-018-0476-3. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
8
Comparing Strategies Targeting Osteoporosis to Prevent Fractures After an Upper Extremity Fracture (C-STOP Trial): A Randomized Controlled Trial.比较骨质疏松症防治策略以预防上肢骨折后骨折(C-STOP 试验):一项随机对照试验。
J Bone Miner Res. 2018 Dec;33(12):2114-2121. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3557. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
9
A global call to action to improve the care of people with fragility fractures.改善脆性骨折患者护理的全球行动呼吁。
Injury. 2018 Aug;49(8):1393-1397. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.06.032. Epub 2018 Jun 23.
10
Fracture liaison services improve outcomes of patients with osteoporosis-related fractures: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.骨折联络服务可改善骨质疏松性骨折患者的结局:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
Bone. 2018 Jun;111:92-100. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2018.03.018. Epub 2018 Mar 16.