University of Massachusetts Boston.
University of Massachusetts Boston.
Behav Ther. 2019 Nov;50(6):1075-1086. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Mar 23.
As evidence grows supporting certain mechanisms of change in psychological treatments and we improve statistical approaches to measuring them, it is important that we also explore how mechanisms and processes are related to each other, and how they together affect treatment outcomes. To answer these questions about interrelating processes and mechanisms, we need to take advantage of frequent assessment and modeling techniques that allow for an examination of the influence of one mechanism on another over time. Within cognitive behavioral therapy, studies have shown support for both decentering, the ability to observe thoughts and feelings as objective events in the mind, and anticipatory processing, the repetitive thinking about upcoming social situations, as potentially related mechanisms of change. Therefore, the current study examined weekly ratings of decentering and a single-item anticipatory processing question to examine the interrelation among these change mechanisms in 59 individuals who received a 12-weeks of Cognitive Behavioral Group Therapy for social anxiety disorder. Overall, these results found that both anticipatory processing and decentering changed over the course therapy for clients. Change in both anticipatory processing and decentering was related to outcome. The bivariate latent difference score analysis showed that anticipatory processing was a leading indicator of change in decentering, but not the reverse, indicating that change in anticipatory processing is leading to change in decentering. It may be that with the focus on cognitive reappraisal in this treatment, that reducing anticipatory processing is freeing up the cognitive resources for decentering to occur.
随着越来越多的证据支持心理治疗中某些变化机制,以及我们改进了衡量这些机制的统计方法,探索机制和过程之间的相互关系以及它们如何共同影响治疗结果变得尤为重要。为了回答这些关于相互关联的过程和机制的问题,我们需要利用频繁评估和建模技术,这些技术可以考察一个机制随时间对另一个机制的影响。在认知行为疗法中,研究表明,去中心化的能力(即将思维和感觉视为头脑中客观事件的能力)和预期处理(对即将到来的社交情境进行反复思考的能力)这两种机制都可能是改变的潜在机制。因此,本研究通过每周评估去中心化和一个关于预期处理的单项问题,考察了 59 名接受为期 12 周认知行为团体治疗社交焦虑障碍的患者中这些变化机制之间的相互关系。总的来说,这些结果发现,预期处理和去中心化在治疗过程中都发生了变化。预期处理和去中心化的变化与结果相关。双变量潜在差异评分分析表明,预期处理是去中心化变化的先行指标,但不是相反,这表明预期处理的变化导致了去中心化的变化。可能是由于这种治疗方法强调认知重评,因此减少预期处理为去中心化的发生释放了认知资源。