• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

焦虑障碍和重性抑郁障碍中的自动化。

Automaticity in anxiety disorders and major depressive disorder.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904‐4400, USA.

出版信息

Clin Psychol Rev. 2012 Aug;32(6):575-603. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jul 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2012.06.004
PMID:22858684
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3419810/
Abstract

In this paper we examine the nature of automatic cognitive processing in anxiety disorders and Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Rather than viewing automaticity as a unitary construct, we follow a social cognition perspective (Bargh, 1994) that argues for four theoretically independent features of automaticity: unconscious (processing of emotional stimuli occurs outside awareness), efficient (processing emotional meaning uses minimal attentional resources), unintentional (no goal is needed to engage in processing emotional meaning), and uncontrollable (limited ability to avoid, alter or terminate processing emotional stimuli). Our review of the literature suggests that most anxiety disorders are characterized by uncontrollable, and likely also unconscious and unintentional, biased processing of threat-relevant information. In contrast, MDD is most clearly typified by uncontrollable, but not unconscious or unintentional, processing of negative information. For the anxiety disorders and for MDD, there is no sufficient evidence to draw firm conclusions about efficiency of processing, though early indications are that neither anxiety disorders nor MDD are characterized by this feature. Clinical and theoretical implications of these findings are discussed and directions for future research are offered. In particular, it is clear that paradigms that more directly delineate the different features of automaticity are required to gain a more comprehensive and systematic understanding of the importance of automatic processing in emotion dysregulation.

摘要

本文探讨了焦虑障碍和重度抑郁症(MDD)中自动认知加工的本质。我们没有将自动性视为一个单一的概念,而是遵循社会认知观点(Bargh,1994),该观点认为自动性具有四个理论上独立的特征:无意识(情绪刺激的处理发生在意识之外)、高效(处理情绪意义使用最少的注意力资源)、无意(无需目标即可参与处理情绪意义)和不可控(有限的能力来避免、改变或终止处理情绪刺激)。我们对文献的回顾表明,大多数焦虑障碍的特点是对威胁相关信息的不可控、可能还有无意识和无意的偏见处理。相比之下,MDD 的特点是对负性信息的不可控处理,但不是无意识或无意的。对于焦虑障碍和 MDD,没有足够的证据可以得出关于处理效率的明确结论,尽管早期迹象表明,焦虑障碍和 MDD 都没有这个特征。讨论了这些发现的临床和理论意义,并提出了未来研究的方向。特别是,很明显,需要更直接地描绘自动性不同特征的范式,以更全面和系统地理解自动处理在情绪失调中的重要性。

相似文献

1
Automaticity in anxiety disorders and major depressive disorder.焦虑障碍和重性抑郁障碍中的自动化。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2012 Aug;32(6):575-603. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
2
Characterizing emotional Stroop interference in posttraumatic stress disorder, major depression and anxiety disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.描述创伤后应激障碍、重度抑郁症和焦虑障碍中的情绪 Stroop 干扰:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 9;14(4):e0214998. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214998. eCollection 2019.
3
Attentional bias in clinical depression and anxiety: The impact of emotional and non-emotional distracting information.临床抑郁症和焦虑症中的注意偏向:情绪性和非情绪性干扰信息的影响。
Biol Psychol. 2017 Jan;122:4-12. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.07.012. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
4
Altered negative unconscious processing in major depressive disorder: an exploratory neuropsychological study.重度抑郁症患者负性无意识加工的改变:一项探索性神经心理学研究。
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21881. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021881. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
5
Access of emotional information to visual awareness in patients with major depressive disorder.重性抑郁障碍患者情绪信息对视觉意识的获取。
Psychol Med. 2011 Aug;41(8):1615-24. doi: 10.1017/S0033291710002540. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
6
Self-other referential neural processing in social anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder.社交焦虑障碍和重度抑郁症中的自我-他人参照神经加工
Neuroimage Clin. 2021;30:102669. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102669. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
7
Automaticity and the anxiety disorders.自律性与焦虑症
Behav Res Ther. 1995 Sep;33(7):747-54. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(95)00015-p.
8
Disorder- and cognitive demand-specific neurofunctional alterations during social emotional working memory in generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder.广泛性焦虑障碍和重性抑郁障碍患者社会情感工作记忆的神经功能改变与紊乱和认知需求特异性相关。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Jul 1;308:98-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.023. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
9
Comparing cognitive styles in social anxiety and major depressive disorders: An examination of rumination, worry, and reappraisal.比较社交焦虑症和重度抑郁症患者的认知风格:对反刍思维、担忧和重评的考察。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2019 Jun;58(2):231-244. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12210. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
10
Memory biases in the anxiety disorders: current status.焦虑症中的记忆偏差:现状
Clin Psychol Rev. 2002 May;22(4):587-627. doi: 10.1016/s0272-7358(01)00113-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over the Orbitofrontal Cortex Enhances Self-Reported Confidence but Reduces Metacognitive Sensitivity in a Perceptual Decision-Making Task.经颅直流电刺激眶额皮质可增强自我报告的信心,但会降低感知决策任务中的元认知敏感性。
Biomedicines. 2025 Jun 21;13(7):1522. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13071522.
2
Choosing certainty over risk: Associations of PTSD symptom severity with memory sampling during experiential decision making.选择确定性而非风险:创伤后应激障碍症状严重程度与体验性决策过程中记忆抽样的关联。
J Anxiety Disord. 2025 Mar;110:102979. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2025.102979. Epub 2025 Jan 26.
3
Reliability and validity of four cognitive interpretation bias measures in the context of social anxiety.社交焦虑背景下四种认知解释偏差测量方法的信度和效度
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jan 7;57(1):48. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02576-0.
4
Short-Term Memory Capacity Predicts Willingness to Expend Cognitive Effort for Reward.短期记忆容量预测人们为获得奖励而付出认知努力的意愿。
eNeuro. 2024 Jul 1;11(7). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0068-24.2024. Print 2024 Jul.
5
Threat of shock increases distractor susceptibility during the short-term maintenance of visual information.在视觉信息的短期维持过程中,休克威胁会增加注意力分散的易感性。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2024 Jun 13;19(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsae036.
6
Positive reappraisal coping mediates the relationship between parental abuse and lack of affection on adulthood generalized anxiety severity.积极的重新评价应对方式在父母虐待和缺乏亲情与成年广泛性焦虑严重程度之间起中介作用。
J Anxiety Disord. 2024 Mar;102:102826. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102826. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
7
Whole-Brain Resting-State Functional Connectivity Patterns Associated With Pediatric Anxiety and Involuntary Attention Capture.与儿童焦虑和非自愿注意力捕捉相关的全脑静息态功能连接模式。
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2021 Sep;1(3):229-238. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
8
Maternal depressive symptoms and maternal child-directed speech: A systematic review.母亲抑郁症状与母亲对儿童指向性言语:系统评价。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Jan 15;297:194-207. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.10.015. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
9
Biased Maintenance of Attention on Sad Faces in Clinically Depressed Youth: An Eye-Tracking Study.临床抑郁青少年对悲伤面孔注意力偏向的维持:一项眼动研究。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2023 Feb;54(1):189-201. doi: 10.1007/s10578-021-01229-z. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
10
Cognitive Control, Cognitive Biases and Emotion Regulation in Depression: A New Proposal for an Integrative Interplay Model.抑郁症中的认知控制、认知偏差与情绪调节:整合交互模型的新提议
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 30;12:628416. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.628416. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Toward a Unified Treatment for Emotional Disorders - Republished Article.迈向情绪障碍的统一治疗——重新发表的文章。
Behav Ther. 2016 Nov;47(6):838-853. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2016.11.005. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
2
Cognitive Bias Modification: Past Perspectives, Current Findings, and Future Applications.认知偏差修正:过去的观点、当前的发现和未来的应用。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Nov;6(6):521-36. doi: 10.1177/1745691611421205.
3
Rethinking Rumination.重新思考沉思。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Sep;3(5):400-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00088.x.
4
Psychopathology and thought suppression: a quantitative review.心理病理学与思维抑制:定量综述。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2012 Apr;32(3):189-201. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.01.001. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
5
Cognitive bias modification approaches to anxiety.认知偏差修正方法治疗焦虑。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2012;8:189-217. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143052. Epub 2011 Oct 25.
6
A selective impairment in attentional disengagement from erotica in obsessive-compulsive disorder.强迫症患者在注意力脱离色情内容上存在选择性障碍。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Dec 1;35(8):1977-82. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2011.07.005. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
7
A meta-analysis of the effect of cognitive bias modification on anxiety and depression.认知偏差修正对焦虑和抑郁影响的荟萃分析。
Psychol Bull. 2011 Nov;137(6):940-58. doi: 10.1037/a0024355.
8
Implicit measures of association in psychopathology research.心理病理学研究中的内隐关联测量。
Psychol Bull. 2011 Jan;137(1):149-193. doi: 10.1037/a0021729.
9
Deficient distracter inhibition and enhanced facilitation for emotional stimuli in depression: an ERP study.抑郁患者对情绪刺激存在分心抑制不足和易化增强:一项 ERP 研究。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2011 Feb;79(2):249-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.10.016. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
10
Emotion processing and the amygdala: from a 'low road' to 'many roads' of evaluating biological significance.情绪处理与杏仁核:从评估生物意义的“低路”到“多 路”。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Nov;11(11):773-83. doi: 10.1038/nrn2920.