Suppr超能文献

单法兰定制髋臼组件通过金属缺陷重建促进严重髋臼骨缺损的生物力学恢复。

Monoflanged Custom-Made Acetabular Components Promote Biomechanical Restoration of Severe Acetabular Bone Defects by Metallic Defect Reconstruction.

机构信息

Department for Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Department for Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2020 Mar;35(3):831-835. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.10.040. Epub 2019 Oct 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Custom-made acetabular components (CMAC) are one established method to address severe acetabular bone defects. Monoflanged CMAC may represent an advantageous alternative to establish triflanged CMAC as they promote better primary stability through metallic defect reconstruction and thus anatomic restoration of the center of rotation (COR).

METHODS

Fifty-eight consecutive (21 triflanged and 37 monoflanged) CMAC were evaluated for overall survival, reasons for revision, radiological restoration of COR, and clinical outcome parameters.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between both design types regarding overall survival, revision rates, Harris Hip Score, or visual analog scale (pain) score at latest follow-up (mean, 56.3 ± 28.7 months). Triflanged CMAC showed a significant lateralization (P ≤ .001) and cranialization (P = .003) of the COR compared to the contralateral side. Monoflanged CMAC restored the anatomic COR. Reasons for revision surgery and explantation were periprosthetic joint infection (n = 12) and aseptic loosening (n = 2) without significant differences between both groups.

CONCLUSION

Monoflanged CMAC demonstrate similar clinical outcome parameters and survival rates as triflanged CMAC but superior biomechanical features and represent therefore a solid alternative treatment option and implant design.

摘要

背景

定制髋臼组件(CMAC)是解决严重髋臼骨缺损的一种既定方法。与建立三翼 CMAC 相比,单翼 CMAC 可能代表了一种有利的替代方法,因为它们通过金属缺陷重建促进更好的初始稳定性,从而实现旋转中心(COR)的解剖学恢复。

方法

对 58 例连续(21 例三叶型和 37 例单翼型)CMAC 进行了总体存活率、翻修原因、COR 的放射学重建和临床结果参数的评估。

结果

在总体存活率、翻修率、Harris 髋关节评分或末次随访时的视觉模拟评分(疼痛)方面,两种设计类型之间无显著差异(平均 56.3 ± 28.7 个月)。三叶型 CMAC 与对侧相比,COR 明显向外侧(P ≤.001)和颅侧(P =.003)偏位。单翼 CMAC 恢复了 COR 的解剖学形态。翻修手术和取出的原因是假体周围关节感染(n = 12)和无菌性松动(n = 2),两组之间无显著差异。

结论

单翼 CMAC 与三叶型 CMAC 具有相似的临床结果参数和存活率,但具有更好的生物力学特征,因此代表了一种可靠的替代治疗选择和植入物设计。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验