Suppr超能文献

急诊护理工作量评估工具的开发与验证。

Development and validation of an assessment tool for nursing workload in emergency departments.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Division of Nursing Science and Midwifery, Centre for Research and Innovation in Care, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.

Clinical Pharmacology, Heymans Institute, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2020 Mar;29(5-6):794-809. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15106. Epub 2019 Dec 19.

Abstract

AIMS

To develop the Workload Assessment of Nurses on Emergency (WANE) tool and to test its validity and reliability to measure nursing workload in the emergency departments.

BACKGROUND

Ensuring safe nursing staffing in emergency departments is a worldwide concern. There is no valid tool to measure emergency nursing workload in order to determine the needed nurse staffing in the emergency departments.

DESIGN

A two-year, cross-sectional, multicenter study.

METHODS

Workload was operationalised as the time nurses spent with nursing activities, classified into direct and indirect care. A board of experts provided content validity. Construct validity was evaluated by examining the WANE's correlations and group-discriminations patterns within the network of variables known to determine nursing workload. Reliability was assessed by the tool's ability to yield consistent results across repeated measurements. Reporting of this research adheres to STROBE guidelines.

RESULTS

Seven emergency departments, including 3,024 patients, were involved in the first year and 18 emergency departments and 7,442 patients in the second year. Direct care time correlated positively and significantly with patient dependency on nursing care, age and length of emergency department stay and discriminated between the categories of dependency on nursing care, age and hospitalisation. Both direct and indirect care time discriminated between the emergency departments according to different patient care profiles and unit characteristics. WANE showed consistent results across measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

Results support the WANE's reliability and validity to measure emergency nursing workload. This tool could be used to determine, on patient and unit, a baseline nurse staffing and the nursing skill mix in the emergency departments. WANE is also an evidence-based management tool for benchmarking purposes.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The use of an evidence-based workload tool in making staffing decisions in emergency departments is crucial to ensure safe patient care and prevent work overload in nursing staff.

摘要

目的

开发护士工作量评估工具(WANE),并检验其在测量急诊科护理工作量方面的有效性和可靠性。

背景

确保急诊科护理人员的安全配置是全球关注的问题。目前尚无有效的工具来衡量急诊护理工作量,以便确定急诊科所需的护士配置。

设计

一项为期两年的、跨部门、多中心的研究。

方法

工作量被定义为护士从事护理活动的时间,分为直接护理和间接护理。一个专家委员会提供了内容效度。通过检验 WANE 与已知决定护理工作量的变量网络中的相关性和组间区分模式,评估其结构效度。通过工具在重复测量中产生一致结果的能力来评估可靠性。本研究的报告符合 STROBE 指南。

结果

第一年有 7 个急诊科,包括 3024 名患者,第二年有 18 个急诊科和 7442 名患者参与。直接护理时间与患者对护理的依赖程度、年龄和急诊科停留时间呈正相关且显著相关,并区分了对护理的依赖程度、年龄和住院类别。直接和间接护理时间根据不同的患者护理特征和科室特征区分了不同的急诊科。WANE 在测量中表现出一致的结果。

结论

结果支持 WANE 测量急诊护理工作量的可靠性和有效性。该工具可用于确定患者和科室的基础护士配置以及急诊科的护理技能组合。WANE 也是基准管理工具,可用于基准比较。

临床意义

在急诊科做出人员配置决策时使用基于证据的工作量工具对于确保患者安全护理和防止护理人员工作过载至关重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验