Suppr超能文献

左乙拉西坦与苯妥英钠治疗儿童癫痫持续状态的对比研究

Levetiracetam versus phenytoin in children with status epilepticus.

作者信息

Wani Gowhar, Imran Ayesha, Dhawan Neeraj, Gupta Anumodhan, Giri Javed I

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Hamdard Institute of Medical Science and Research, Delhi, India.

Department of Pediatrics, Government Doon Medical College, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.

出版信息

J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 Oct 31;8(10):3367-3371. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_750_19. eCollection 2019 Oct.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous levetiracetam and phenytoin in status epilepticus.

METHODOLOGY

A prospective, randomized controlled, nonblinded study was conducted in children 1 month to 12 years of age with active seizure and with status epilepticus. A total of 104 children were randomly allocated to either group 1 (levetiracetam) or group 2 (phenytoin) on the basis of computer-generated random number table. Children already on antiepileptic drugs, very sick children with shock, impending respiratory failure, or head injury, and children hypersensitive to phenytoin or levetiracetam were excluded. Data analysis was done by IBM SPSS statistics.

RESULTS

The mean age was 4.09 years with a male preponderance with the most common type of seizure being generalized type (74%). The seizures were controlled in all 104 patients initially within 40 min. Seizure control for 24 h was significantly better in group 1 (96%) when compared with group 2 (59.6%) ( = 0.0001). Minibolus of drug was given in 28.8% in group 1 and 46.2% in group 2 ( = 0.068). The seizure recurrence in groups 1 and 2 in the first hour was 1.9% and 5.8%, respectively ( = 0.61), whereas the recurrence between 1 and 24 h was significantly more in group 1 (34.6%) when compared with group 2 (3.8%) ( = 0.0001). The mean time to control seizure was comparable between both the groups ( = 0.71). There was no significant adverse effect in both the groups.

CONCLUSION

Levetiracetam is more effective than phenytoin for seizure control for 24 h in children with status epilepticus, and it is safe and effective as a second-line therapy.

摘要

背景

比较静脉注射左乙拉西坦和苯妥英钠治疗癫痫持续状态的疗效和安全性。

方法

对1个月至12岁有活动性癫痫发作且处于癫痫持续状态的儿童进行一项前瞻性、随机对照、非盲法研究。根据计算机生成的随机数字表,将104名儿童随机分为1组(左乙拉西坦)或2组(苯妥英钠)。已服用抗癫痫药物的儿童、患有休克、即将发生呼吸衰竭或头部受伤的重病儿童以及对苯妥英钠或左乙拉西坦过敏的儿童被排除在外。数据分析采用IBM SPSS统计学软件进行。

结果

平均年龄为4.09岁,男性居多,最常见的癫痫发作类型为全身性发作(74%)。所有104例患者的癫痫发作最初均在40分钟内得到控制。与第2组(59.6%)相比,第1组24小时癫痫发作控制情况明显更好(96%)(P = 0.0001)。第1组28.8%的患者给予了小剂量药物推注,第2组为46.2%(P = 0.068)。第1组和第2组在第1小时内癫痫复发率分别为1.9%和5.8%(P = 0.61),而在1至24小时内,第1组的复发率(34.6%)明显高于第2组(3.8%)(P = 0.0001)。两组控制癫痫发作的平均时间相当(P = 0.71)。两组均未出现明显不良反应。

结论

对于癫痫持续状态的儿童,左乙拉西坦在控制癫痫发作24小时方面比苯妥英钠更有效,作为二线治疗药物安全有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca8f/6857426/2e9d0cb7baef/JFMPC-8-3367-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验