Suppr超能文献

静脉注射左乙拉西坦与静脉注射苯妥英钠作为小儿惊厥性癫痫持续状态二线治疗的开放标签随机对照试验。

Intravenous levetiracetam versus intravenous phenytoin as second Line treatment in pediatric convulsive status epilepticus- open label randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Kartek Mamum, Kannan Abinaya, Anand Varun, Sahoo Manas R

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, TRIHMS, Naharlagun, Arunachal Pradesh, India.

Department of Pediatrics, AIIMS, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.

出版信息

J Family Med Prim Care. 2024 Aug;13(8):3368-3373. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1747_23. Epub 2024 Jul 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Benzodiazepines (BZDs) are recommended as the initial therapy of choice in status epilepticus (SE). The age-old second-line treatment for BZD refractory convulsive SE is intravenous phenytoin (PHT) based predominantly on nonrandomized clinical trial data. We did this study to compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous levetiracetam (LEV) and PHT as second-line antiseizure medication (ASM) for children with SE.

METHODOLOGY

A prospective, randomized controlled, open-label study was conducted in children 3 months to 15 years of age with SE in Pediatric Emergency. A total of 41 children were randomly allocated to either group 1 (Levetiracetam) or group 2 (Phenytoin) on the basis of computer-generated randomization. Children who were already on antiseizure medications, either LEV or PHT, or receiving these drugs outside for SE were excluded. Data analysis was done by SPSS V25.

RESULTS

The most common age group presenting with SE was 12 months to 5 years. Clinical cessation of seizure 5 minutes after the completion of drugs was 85% (17/20) in Levetiracetam group and 90.5% (19/21) in Phenytoin group. Recurrence of seizure within 24 hours was noted in 35% (7/20) in Levetiracetam group and 38.1% (8/21) in Phenytoin group. There was no statistically significant difference noted in both the groups in terms of seizure cessation, adverse events, and recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy and safety of LEV were found to be comparable to those of PHT in controlling seizure as second-line ASM in SE.

摘要

背景

苯二氮䓬类药物(BZDs)被推荐作为癫痫持续状态(SE)的首选初始治疗药物。基于非随机临床试验数据,苯二氮䓬类药物难治性惊厥性SE的传统二线治疗方法是静脉注射苯妥英钠(PHT)。我们开展这项研究以比较静脉注射左乙拉西坦(LEV)和PHT作为SE患儿二线抗癫痫药物(ASM)的疗效和安全性。

方法

在儿科急诊中对3个月至15岁的SE患儿进行了一项前瞻性、随机对照、开放标签研究。根据计算机生成的随机化方法,将41名儿童随机分配到第1组(左乙拉西坦)或第2组(苯妥英钠)。已在服用抗癫痫药物(LEV或PHT)或在院外因SE正在接受这些药物治疗的儿童被排除。采用SPSS V25进行数据分析。

结果

出现SE的最常见年龄组为12个月至5岁。左乙拉西坦组在用药结束后5分钟临床癫痫停止率为85%(17/20),苯妥英钠组为90.5%(19/21)。左乙拉西坦组24小时内癫痫复发率为35%(7/20),苯妥英钠组为38.1%(8/21)。两组在癫痫停止、不良事件和复发方面均未观察到统计学上的显著差异。

结论

在SE中作为二线ASM控制癫痫发作方面,发现左乙拉西坦的疗效和安全性与苯妥英钠相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3545/11368275/a6c14ce84cae/JFMPC-13-3368-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验