Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Science , University of Nevada, Reno , Reno , Nevada 89557 , United States.
School of the Environment , Nanjing University , Nanjing , Jiangsu 210023 , China.
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Dec 17;53(24):14489-14495. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b04648. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
The atmosphere is an important (1) pathway by which mercury (Hg) is transported around the globe and (2) source of Hg to ecosystems. Thus, understanding Hg atmospheric chemistry is critical for understanding the biogeochemical cycle and impacts to human and ecosystem health. Work over the past 13 years has demonstrated that the standard instrument used to measure atmospheric Hg does not accurately quantify gaseous oxidized mercury (GOM) or particulate bound mercury (PBM). This study focused on comparing four methods for quantifying atmospheric Hg and identifying Hg(II) compounds. Data from two automated systems, the Tekran 2537/1130 system and the University of Nevada, Reno-Dual Channel System (DCS), were compared with two University of Nevada, Reno-Reactive Mercury Active Systems (RMAS 2.0). One RMAS 2.0 included cation exchange membranes (CEMs) and nylon membranes, and the second included a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane upstream of the CEM and nylon membranes. The Tekran system and the DCS underestimated GOM concentrations with respect to that measured using the RMAS 2.0. The RMAS 2.0 with the upstream PTFE provided a means of distinguishing GOM and PBM. Thermal desorption of nylon membrane data identified a variety of GOM and PBM compounds present.
大气是汞(Hg)在全球范围内迁移的重要途径,也是向生态系统输入汞的来源。因此,了解汞的大气化学对于理解其生物地球化学循环以及对人类和生态系统健康的影响至关重要。过去 13 年的研究工作表明,用于测量大气汞的标准仪器不能准确地量化气态氧化汞(GOM)或颗粒结合态汞(PBM)。本研究重点比较了四种定量大气汞和识别 Hg(II)化合物的方法。两种自动系统(Tekran 2537/1130 系统和内华达大学雷诺分校双通道系统(DCS))的数据与内华达大学雷诺分校的两个反应性汞主动系统(RMAS 2.0)进行了比较。一个 RMAS 2.0 包括阳离子交换膜(CEM)和尼龙膜,第二个包括在 CEM 和尼龙膜上游的聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)膜。Tekran 系统和 DCS 对 GOM 浓度的低估相对于 RMAS 2.0 测量的浓度。带有上游 PTFE 的 RMAS 2.0 提供了一种区分 GOM 和 PBM 的方法。尼龙膜数据的热解吸确定了存在的各种 GOM 和 PBM 化合物。