Section of Oral Rehabilitation, Department of Odontology, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Clinic of Prosthodontics, Public Dental Health Service of Skåne, Malmö, Sweden.
J Oral Rehabil. 2020 Feb;47(2):212-220. doi: 10.1111/joor.12911. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
To explore impairments due to tooth loss and expectations of prosthetic replacements in an urban group and a rural group of patients in Sweden.
Semi-structured interviews were performed on 35 partially edentulous patients from prosthodontic specialist clinics located in an urban area and a rural area in Sweden. The interviews focused on impairments due to tooth loss and expectations of prosthetic restorations. Analysis was made using the grounded theory approach, allowing in-depth investigation of the phenomenon.
Functional, aesthetic and social impairments were mentioned, and coping strategies (eg chewing differently and laughing less) and modifications (eg age, time and social setting) of the impairments were described. The rural patient group accepted impairments somewhat better than the urban one. Otherwise, there was only minor difference between the groups. Removable prosthodontic restorations were more acceptable among rural patients. Urban patients insisted more often on implant-based restorations and had higher expectations of longevity. Patients with minor impairments still wanted treatment, based on concerns about the future of their dentition. The interviews themselves generated new thoughts in the patients and were thus considered valuable by the patients.
Impairments due to tooth loss and expectations of prosthetic replacements were expressed in the same way in the rural and urban patient groups. However, in the rural population, there was a higher acceptance of impairments and also of removable prosthetic restorations, whereas the urban population expressed a higher demand for implant-based restorations.
探讨瑞典城乡两组患者因缺牙导致的功能障碍和对义齿修复的期望。
对瑞典城乡地区口腔修复专科诊所的 35 名部分牙列缺失患者进行半结构访谈。访谈重点为缺牙导致的功能障碍以及对义齿修复的期望。采用扎根理论方法进行分析,深入研究这一现象。
功能性、美观性和社会性障碍被提及,描述了应对策略(如改变咀嚼方式和减少笑容)和障碍的调整(如年龄、时间和社会环境)。农村患者组比城市患者组更容易接受障碍。除此之外,两组之间只有细微的差异。农村患者更能接受可摘义齿修复。城市患者更坚持使用基于种植体的修复体,并对修复体的使用寿命有更高的期望。只有轻微障碍的患者仍希望治疗,这是基于对未来牙齿状况的担忧。访谈本身也引发了患者的新思考,因此被患者认为是有价值的。
城乡两组患者对缺牙导致的功能障碍和对义齿修复的期望表达方式相同。然而,在农村人群中,对障碍和可摘义齿修复的接受程度更高,而城市人群则更倾向于基于种植体的修复体。