Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust, Fordingbridge, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 19;14(11):e0225201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225201. eCollection 2019.
Lethal control is widely employed to suppress the numbers of target wildlife species within restricted management areas. The success of such measures is expected to vary with local circumstances affecting rates of removal and replacement. There is a need both to evaluate success in individual cases and to understand variability and its causes. In Britain, red fox (Vulpes vulpes) populations are culled within the confines of shooting estates to benefit game and wildlife prey species. We developed a Bayesian state-space model for within-year fox population dynamics within such restricted areas and fitted it to data on culling effort and success obtained from gamekeepers on 22 shooting estates of 2 to 36 km2. We used informative priors for key population processes-immigration, cub recruitment and non-culling mortality-that could not be quantified in the field. Using simulated datasets we showed that the model reliably estimated fox density and demographic parameters, and we showed that conclusions drawn from real data were robust to alternative model assumptions. All estates achieved suppression of the fox population, with pre-breeding fox density on average 47% (range 20%-90%) of estimated carrying capacity. As expected, the number of foxes killed was a poor indicator of effectiveness. Estimated rates of immigration were variable among estates, but in most cases indicated rapid replacement of culled foxes so that intensive culling efforts were required to maintain low fox densities. Due to this short-term impact, control effort focussed on the spring and summer period may be essential to achieve management goals for prey species. During the critical March-July breeding period, mean fox densities on all estates were suppressed below carrying capacity, and some maintained consistently low fox densities throughout this period. A similar model will be useful in other situations to quantify the effectiveness of lethal control on restricted areas.
致死控制被广泛用于在受限制的管理区域内抑制目标野生动物物种的数量。这些措施的成功预计会因影响清除和替代率的当地情况而有所不同。需要评估个别案例的成功,并了解可变性及其原因。在英国,狐狸( Vulpes vulpes )种群在射击庄园的范围内被扑杀,以有利于游戏和野生动物的猎物物种。我们为这种受限区域内的狐狸种群动态开发了一个贝叶斯状态空间模型,并将其拟合到从 22 个 2 至 36 平方公里的射击庄园的猎场看守那里获得的关于扑杀工作和成功率的数据。我们为无法在实地量化的关键种群过程 - 移民、幼崽招募和非扑杀死亡率 - 使用了信息丰富的先验概率。使用模拟数据集,我们表明该模型可靠地估计了狐狸的密度和人口参数,并且我们表明,从真实数据中得出的结论对替代模型假设具有稳健性。所有庄园都实现了对狐狸种群的抑制,繁殖前狐狸密度平均为估计承载能力的 47%(范围为 20%-90%)。如预期的那样,被杀死的狐狸数量是效果的一个很差的指标。估计的移民率在庄园之间变化,但在大多数情况下表明被扑杀的狐狸迅速得到替代,因此需要密集的扑杀努力来维持低狐狸密度。由于这种短期影响,因此春季和夏季期间集中控制工作可能对实现猎物物种的管理目标至关重要。在关键的 3 月至 7 月繁殖期间,所有庄园的平均狐狸密度都低于承载能力,并且在此期间,一些庄园一直保持着较低的狐狸密度。类似的模型在其他情况下也将非常有用,可用于量化受限区域内致死控制的有效性。