Prosthodontic Department, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Prosthodontic Department, Dar Al Uloom University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020 Jun;32(4):389-394. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12549. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the fracture resistance and failure mode of endodontically treated teeth restored with lithium disilicate endocrowns of different crown thicknesses.
A total of 30 endodontically treated permanent mandibular first molars were sectioned horizontally 2 mm above the highest point of the cemento-enamel junction. The specimens were divided into three groups, and each group was restored with lithium disilicate (IPS e-max press) endocrowns of different crown thicknesses (3, 4.5, and 6 mm, respectively). After cementation, specimens were stored in room temperature for 72 hours, followed by subjecting them to compressive strength testing until failure. The fracture loads and the failure mode were recorded. Statistically analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance.
A statistically significant difference was found in the fracture resistance between the three groups with the highest fracture resistance in the 3 mm group, followed by the 4.5 mm group, and the least in the 6 mm group (P < .05). Most of the failures were accompanied with tooth fracture (90% in 3 mm group, 100% in 4.5 mm group, and 80% in 6 mm group).
Increasing the crown thickness of the endocrowns reduced the fracture resistance of restored teeth. Minimum fracture loads for all teeth restored with endocrowns were significantly higher than the maximum occlusal forces reported in the literature.
Fracture resistance and mode of failure of lithium disilicate (IPS e-max press) endocrowns varies widely between crown thicknesses. Clinicians should be cautious with crown thickness for endocrown restorations.
本研究旨在评估不同冠厚的锂硅玻璃陶瓷全瓷内冠修复的根管治疗牙的抗折能力和破坏模式。
共 30 颗下颌第一磨牙经根管治疗后,在釉牙骨质界上方 2mm 处水平截断。将样本分为三组,每组分别用不同冠厚(3、4.5 和 6mm)的锂硅玻璃陶瓷(IPS e-max press)全瓷内冠修复。粘结后,标本在室温下储存 72 小时,然后进行抗压强度测试直至破坏。记录断裂载荷和破坏模式。采用单因素方差分析进行统计学分析。
三组间的抗折能力存在显著差异,其中 3mm 组的抗折能力最高,4.5mm 组次之,6mm 组最低(P<0.05)。大多数破坏伴有牙体折裂(3mm 组 90%,4.5mm 组 100%,6mm 组 80%)。
内冠冠厚的增加降低了修复牙的抗折能力。所有内冠修复牙的最小断裂载荷均明显高于文献报道的最大颌力。
锂硅玻璃陶瓷(IPS e-max press)全瓷内冠的抗折能力和破坏模式在冠厚之间差异很大。临床医生在进行内冠修复时应谨慎选择冠厚。