Payne Pamela
Maternal-infant nursing instructor at the Patricia A. Chin School of Nursing, California State University, Los Angeles.
Ethics Hum Res. 2019 Nov;41(6):35-40. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500036.
Scanty evidence exists about the safety and effectiveness of drugs-and of their efficacious dosing-that women may need to treat acute and chronic health issues during their pregnancies. This lack of evidence puts pregnant women and their fetuses at risk of harm from the use or avoidance of drugs during pregnancy. In light of the protectionist approach in regulations governing research with pregnant women and fetuses, trial sponsors, researchers, clinicians, and institutional review boards (IRBs) have been reluctant to include pregnant women in clinical drug trials, applying ethical reasoning for exclusions that reflects a default exclusionary approach. Yet in recent years, many clinicians, researchers, bioethicists, and professional societies have called for a reexamination of the routine practice of excluding pregnant women from clinical research. This paper proposes a practical approach to an ethical framework for IRBs that supports fair inclusion, rather than routine exclusion, of pregnant women in clinical research. This guidance will aid IRBs in ethically including and appropriately protecting pregnant women in research.
关于孕妇在孕期治疗急性和慢性健康问题可能需要使用的药物及其有效剂量的安全性和有效性,现有证据不足。这种证据的缺乏使孕妇及其胎儿面临因孕期使用或避免使用药物而受到伤害的风险。鉴于在涉及孕妇和胎儿的研究监管中采取的保护主义方法,试验申办者、研究人员、临床医生和机构审查委员会(IRB)一直不愿将孕妇纳入临床药物试验,他们运用伦理推理进行排除,这体现了一种默认的排除性方法。然而,近年来,许多临床医生、研究人员、生物伦理学家和专业协会呼吁重新审视将孕妇排除在临床研究之外的常规做法。本文提出了一种实用方法,为IRB构建一个伦理框架,以支持在临床研究中公平纳入而非常规排除孕妇。本指南将帮助IRB在伦理上纳入并适当保护参与研究的孕妇。